Re: [IxDA Discuss] Compared to What?

2008-07-05 Thread Steve Baty
You might also like to take a look at Stephen K. Campbell's Flaws and Fallacies in Statistical Thinking, Dover Publications, 2004. It is less social studies-oriented and more focused on the sorts of error in interpretation reporting that I mentioned in my comments. Cheers Steve 2008/7/5 Jens

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Compared to What?

2008-07-05 Thread JimH
Jens, Excellent point, and some great responses already. It seems to me there was a soul/RB song out at least 20 years ago with the title Compared to What? Good song, too. I'll only add that people commit the fallacy of not adding a comparative reference when they say that an interaction or

[IxDA Discuss] Compared to What?

2008-07-04 Thread Jens Meiert
Feeling free to blatantly point to my own take on Compared to What?, http://meiert.com/en/blog/20080703/compared-to-what/. I understand this concept's root in information design, but worry about the supposed fact that not only many designs, but rather news sources fail in answering that question.

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Compared to What?

2008-07-04 Thread Steve Baty
Jens, Interesting article. I've posted a (rather lengthy, sorry) comment, but was very happy to read your post. Steve 2008/7/4 Jens Meiert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Feeling free to blatantly point to my own take on Compared to What?, http://meiert.com/en/blog/20080703/compared-to-what/. I

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Compared to What?

2008-07-04 Thread Chauncey Wilson
This is a very good issue Jens. One of the issues that happens everyday is that someone on a product team will refer to poor usability, but not highlight what the comparison is for this judgment -- is it poor relative to the last version, user expectations, the vice president's opinion, the major