Most modern blogging platforms support RSS feeds for categories/tags out of the
box. Wordpress and Wordpress.com do it by appending "/feed/" to the end of the
category url. For example if you wanted to subscribe to only OSGeo posts from
my blog, you'd just subscribe to:
feed://www.spatiallyad
On 13-Feb-08, at 3:48 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Is it possible for me as a blogger to categorize my entries and for
planet.osgeo to only take the OSGeo related entries I consider
worthy? This feature should improve signal to noise ratio.
I assume you could modify your outgoing feed to acce
Me too. Some time I feel like blogging.
Cameron Shorter wrote:
I like the idea and would like to provide occasional content.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
I like the idea and would like to provide occasional content.
Is it possible for me as a blogger to categorize my entries and for
planet.osgeo to only take the OSGeo related entries I consider worthy?
This feature should improve signal to noise ratio.
Or for uses to filter out authors or cate
I'd be willing to shed the "Sunburned Surveyor" nickname for my real
name on my OpenJUMP blog for OSGeo Planet if asked.
Landon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fee, James
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 2:45 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Sub
I've tried to push folks blogging to step out behind their handles and
put their names out there. I think an OSGeo Planet that were to mimic
the Planet Gnome would be a super idea. I've not pushed the issue as
I've tried to be as open as possible with Planet Geospatial, but if I
were to create a
Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
Hi Miguel,
No, the event is not yet closed. In fact, there's renewed interest after
my previous email :-)
So to all: If the event will be on, it will be in the week of *16-20
June *since that has most people confirmed until now. I will remove the
other options.
Jeroe
Fawcett, David wrote:
I personally like reading the OS bloggers mixed in with the proprietary
bloggers along with the bloggers who write about using tools from both
camps, all at planetgs.com.
Yup, planetgs.com does a great job and James Fee is a pioneer in
gathering geospatial people from bo
Jason Birch wrote:
I like the idea Mateusz.
Great, the gang is growing :-)
I think I'd probably have to remove my blog from the list though,
You're kidding, right?
as I sometimes blog about proprietary software as well :)
This is not a problem.
IMHO, planets are about people, alive memb
Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:
On 12-Feb-08, at 8:31 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Perhaps it's a good idea to setup (or move) Chris' work to
planet.osgeo.org and make it more an official OSGeo Community thing.
I support the idea and have often daydreamed about having a more
community-centric sit
Jason Birch wrote:
I like the idea Mateusz.
I think I'd probably have to remove my blog from the list though, as
I sometimes blog about proprietary software as well :) How does this
work for the other planets; do they allow wishy-washy open source
proponents like me?
From Wikipedia:
"planet
andrea antonello wrote:
Please, could we keep that thread up and running with news please?
Sure
My experience from the last sprint was that the tentative subscription
is a fuzzy one and is only big pain for the organizers. I know that it
is hard to decide so much time ago, but organizers shou
On Wed, February 13, 2008 11:14, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
>
>
>> IMHO, the limiting factor of the GFOSS is that there are tons of
>> companies which are *exploiting* the GFOSS world itself, without giving
>> anything or very little in return
>
> Agreed; I see this a
Hi Chris,
With another six from your side and hopefully others to join up we are
getting pretty close to a minimum required number! We might go for it
with another four that will confirm this week. In that case it will
have to be in the week three (second option in June) since that has
mos
John Griffiths wrote:
Frank et al,
Took me a while since the data I am working with came to me second hand.
The data can be downloaded here:
http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/dnc/index.jsp?epi-content=GENERIC®ionTitle=DNCDX017%20-%20Eastern%20United%20States®ionEdition=040&channelID=4a0874dd2cd3c
Frank et al,
Took me a while since the data I am working with came to me second hand.
The data can be downloaded here:
http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/dnc/index.jsp?epi-content=GENERIC®ionTitle=DNCDX017%20-%20Eastern%20United%20States®ionEdition=040&channelID=4a0874dd2cd3cf00VgnVCMServer3c0201
I like this idea as well.
Landon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:31 PM
To: Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Folks,
Is there any plan or motion to setup an off
It would likely be a good outreach tool to shed some light on OSGeo
projects and technologies for people who don't know the secret handshake
yet.
I personally like reading the OS bloggers mixed in with the proprietary
bloggers along with the bloggers who write about using tools from both
camps,
Hope it helps, one can get demarcations (SAExplore) CD/data from them...
support may be minimal though...
http://www.demarcation.org.za/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi Miguel,
No, the event is not yet closed. In fact, there's renewed interest
after my previous email :-)
So to all: If the event will be on, it will be in the week of 16-20
June since that has most people confirmed until now. I will remove the
other options.
Don't hesitate to still sign
I agree with "there are tons of companies which are *exploiting* the GFOSS
world itself, without giving anything or very little in return"
But I disagree with
>There are also other companies that strongly believe that an OS
>developer should ask for less money than any other non OS
>developers
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
> IMHO, the limiting factor of the GFOSS is that there are tons of
> companies which are *exploiting* the GFOSS world itself, without
> giving anything or very little in return
Agreed; I see this as a relevant problem. And yes, rules for providers
directory are a r
>From my limited experience I can say that the number of GFOSS
developers is not small, not at all; the problem is that GFOSS
developers usually are quiet because they spend all the time they have
coding GFOSS software hence talking about what they do is often
considered a waste time (I am not supp
Please, could we keep that thread up and running with news please?
Also doubts and issues are welcome to understand what the overall feeling is.
We added two people and by tomorrow we could have a third added and confirmed.
My experience from the last sprint was that the tentative subscription
is
FOSS4Geo related science and development is represented at the
Geosciences World Congress in Oslo with an own session (see copy of
earlier announcement below). This is an unique possibility to present
FOSS solutions and science to a new audience.
However, two weeks before the extended abstract d
25 matches
Mail list logo
