Thanks for all of the responses.
After some careful consideration of the responses I received I realize
the challenges of trying to get real world features into the type of
hierarchy I derive.
I'm going to check out the system Geonames is using with RDFa. I think I
might be able to use their
Allen,
You need the Centimeter stuff to realize that something moved over the two
years. Besides, that just ends up being a re-projection in the end anyway.
:c)
bobb
Allan Doyle afdo...@mit.edu wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Bob Basques wrote:
All,
I'm a long time address
Hi
The knowledge you are trying to encode should be represented as associations
between individuals (this place contains that place etc) and concepts (city,
park, post office delivery area, etc) (as in OWL) rather than a URI scheme (see
Geonames). The basic idea is to represent places in a way
Hi
Yes it's a blatent simplification, although... semantics...
Interesting the association between truth and space, and then there's time
regards
Geoff
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On
Behalf Of P Kishor
