Hi All,
This might be of interest for someone in this list.
LSIViewer (Libre Spatial Information Viewer) is an online geospatial data
viewer conceived and developed by Lab for Spatial Informatics, IIIT
Hyderabad.
This is a snapshot of current development branch[2]. This demo includes
charts View
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Martin Feuchtwanger wrote:
> I think this (Cameron's) is a terrible, outmoded concept, just reeking
> if the "old boy" network, "old school tie" mentality.
> Proposals should be judged at face value, not on some preconceived
> notions of what was good before now.
I think this (Cameron's) is a terrible, outmoded concept, just reeking
if the "old boy" network, "old school tie" mentality.
Proposals should be judged at face value, not on some preconceived
notions of what was good before now.
Bravo to the organizing committee for suggesting blind (unbiased) j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
I support whatever the program committee comes up with. If they want
to have a blind review and not have names there, great. If it does not
work out the next committee can do it in a different way.
This is not to cut off the discussion which I
The Program Committee had a healthy discussion about the pros and cons of
structuring the community review process so that presentations are evaluated
solely on the title and abstract description. We decided as a group that the
potential positives outweighed the potential negatives.
The commun
David,
I'm comfortable with the program committee's decision as you describe
it. I do retain a mild preference for presenter names to be mentioned
during the community voting process, but am also interested to hear what
insights you gain from trialling this blind community review process.
I d
Cameron,
Agreed.
As has been discussed in similar threads, and as we found for Sydney, it helps
the LOC determine relative popularity of presentations for room allocation.
However, perhaps the actual final results do not need to be published.
Presenters are either accepted or they're not, aft
Barry,
These FOSS4G updates to the Discuss list are a good initiative.
Well done to you and the team.
Bruce
On 18/01/13 1:48 AM, "Barry Rowlingson" wrote:
Another of the irregular updates of the conference team!
We have our first sponsors - Ordnance Survey (yes, another 'OS')
Google, Edina,
On 01/17/2013 08:24 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> On 17/01/13 03:58, David William Bitner wrote:
>> Additionally following advice from other events as well as many
>> members of our community, we are making the community review process
>> for presentation submission author anonymous as a concern wit
Hi All,
the GRASS community needs as soon as possible someone willing to offer a
few GB and some bandwidth in Latin America and / or South Africa, because
users located over there are experiencing serious problem in downloading
the software (see below an email from grass-web ML). Please help!
Tha
On 17/01/13 03:58, David William Bitner wrote:
Additionally following advice from other events as well as many
members of our community, we are making the community review process
for presentation submission author anonymous as a concern with how we
have done this in the past has been the fear
Another of the irregular updates of the conference team!
We have our first sponsors - Ordnance Survey (yes, another 'OS')
Google, Edina, MapGears, and Metaspatial have all got in with our
early-bird 10% discount sponsor deal. The rest of you have until the
end of the month, then it goes up to full
12 matches
Mail list logo
