The joint working W3C/OGC group that Scott refers to may be found at:
http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Main_Page
Bruce
> From: on behalf of Scott Simmons <
> ssimm...@opengeospatial.org>
> Date: Tuesday, 29 September 2015 07:04
> To: Cameron Shorter
> Cc: Discuss OSGeo
> Subject: Re:
Cameron,
Thanks! Yes, we do currently have a joint working group with W3C for “Spatial
Data on the Web” and that group has been keeping tabs on the activity of this
community in W3C. Interestingly, I think that Jo’s e-mail has rekindled some
of the interest (certainly has for me!).
Best Rega
Scott, Carl,
I suspect this initiative would be something that the OGC would be
interested in?
Cheers, Cameron
On 28/09/2015 9:06 pm, Jo Cook wrote:
Hi All,
I just wanted to draw your attention to this, from W3C if you have not
already seen it. I don't have the technical know-how to see if
Hi Jorge,
I know that was not necessary to go that far. For sure I would not
expect the same from the next CRO. Anyway, I felt that it's necessary to
clarify the status of some of our members. It's clear that some of the
old members don't have enough time these days for OSGeo. Also, we have
m
Very good points. I am ccing Geo4All colleagues as we will follow up this. It
is great to hear that Boundless has an intern working on material for Geo4All
. This kind of closer collaboration and synergies is what we want to build upon.
One of things we want to make sure more students are aware
On 28 September 2015 at 19:52, Vasile Craciunescu
wrote:
> Dear Gert-Jan,
>
> For sure we will check this year with all the charter members that did note
> vote. Checking with all of them it's really no easy task. It took me many
> many hours in the last two days just to send messages to almost 10
Dear Gert-Jan,
For sure we will check this year with all the charter members that did
note vote. Checking with all of them it's really no easy task. It took
me many many hours in the last two days just to send messages to almost
100 people (most of them on other channels than the e-mail used i
Yeah it is an interesting one, wondered if they were going to use that as
an excuse to substitute in whatever maps the platform (android and iOS) had
on hand in the hopes of reducing mobile bandwidth and taking advantage of
offline storage...
--
Jody Garnett
On 28 September 2015 at 04:06, Jo Cook
Hi Jody,
> Thank you for your insightful inputs. I would like to also use this
> opportunity to invite Industry like Boundless team who are committed to
> OSGeo ideals be more actively involved in Geo4All as Industry partner for
> rapidly expanding opportunities.
>
Using my personal email here, so
Hi Jody,
Thank you for your insightful inputs. I would like to also use this opportunity
to invite Industry like Boundless team who are committed to OSGeo ideals be
more actively involved in Geo4All as Industry partner for rapidly expanding
opportunities.
I discussed this with Marc Vloemans
For next years Charter member elections I would suggest to check in
advance with the existing Charter members whether they plan to stay in
their position, and if their contact info as registered with OSGeo is
still valid.
Regards,
GJ
Vasile Craciunescu schreef:
Dear charter members,
Hi Jody,
Thank you for your insightful inputs. I would like to also use this opportunity
to invite Industry like Boundless team who are committed to OSGeo ideals be
more actively involved in Geo4All as Industry partner for rapidly expanding
opportunities.
I discussed this with Marc Vloemans
Hi All,
I just wanted to draw your attention to this, from W3C if you have not
already seen it. I don't have the technical know-how to see if there are
any negative implications but there are opportunities to comment.
https://www.w3.org/community/maps4html/
http://maps4html.github.io/HTML-Map-Ele
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Darrell Fuhriman
wrote:
>
>
> All of those are great and wonderful things! The community does great and
> wonderful things. That’ s not my point.
>
> My point is, those activities would happen even if the OSGeo Foundation
> disappeared. I’m not questioning whe
Hi all,
Just wanted to give my opinion on using a external service as source code
repository, I think there is no problem using github because:
- Source Code is protected by the license,
- If github service stops to address the project needs then port it to
other repository. I remember sourceforg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 26.09.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Darrell Fuhriman:
> This is a perfect example.
>
> All of those are great and wonderful things! The community does great and
> wonderful things. That’ s not my point.
>
> My point is, those activities would happen even
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Julien Michel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a fairly new charter member, so maybe the two following comments here
> will be irrelevant.
>
> From my perspective, having Orfeo ToolBox as an incubating project
> definitively helped us to move in the right direction. I am
Hi all,
I am a fairly new charter member, so maybe the two following comments
here will be irrelevant.
From my perspective, having Orfeo ToolBox as an incubating project
definitively helped us to move in the right direction. I am not saying
that it would not have occured without OSGeo, but t
When people ask me how should they start on the GIS world, I always give
them two advices:
* Check OsGeo.
* Read the Libro Libre de SIG Libre[1] (only Spanish, translations
accepted)
If OsGeo disappeared, someone should invent it.
Which doesn't mean it is the only way to achieve the same goals
19 matches
Mail list logo