Dear Maxi,
I agree with Maria.
In my understanding, the Data4All initiative should be self standing
within OSGeo.
My reasons revolve around the idea that open (geo)data extends far
beyond the public sector (data collected and/or produced by national
agencies within monitoring activities) or
The website committee has been dissolved, making this a more self-servce
experience.
All committee chairs (and foundation officers) should now how website edit
access; if we missed anyone please comment on
https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1789
--
Jody Garnett
On 20 October 2016 at 08:20, Mass
I would tend to think of GeoForAll/Geo4All/geo4all, osgeo-live, etc... as
"Initiatives" rather than software projects.
--
Jody Garnett
On 20 October 2016 at 08:20, Massimiliano Cannata <
massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote:
> dear Board,
> in the OSGeo landing page (www.osgeo.org) in the "OSGeo
+ 1 to Data4All initiative idea. This is a good opportunity for OSGeo to take
leadership to bring together not just OSM, HOT, OSM communities but also the
wider citizen science and PPGIS communities. We can start MoUs with like minded
organisations to support Data4All as we did for Geo4All :-)
Great idea Codrina! Please go ahead!
Cheers.
Maria
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
Messaggio originale
Da: Codrina Maria Ilie
Data: 21/10/2016 11:24 (GMT+01:00)
A: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Oggetto: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Not graduated OSGeo project...
Dear Venka,
G
Dear All,
I would like to announce that on the 6th and 7th December 2016 in Italy, in
San Michele all'Adige at Fondazione Edmund Mach (Trento) [1] there will be
the 1st hackathon of the OSGeo's Open Monitoring System WG [2].
The hackathon named " building fully open climatic monitoring system"
[3]
Dear Maxi
In my opinion it is more a Committee than a working group inside another one.
The data, with their variety, are more than those of direct interest in science.
My 2 cents.
Maria
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
Messaggio originale
Da: Massimiliano Cannata
Data:
Folks,
following up from the FOSS4G 2016 conference in Bonn where "Land
Information" was one of the four key topics this CfP from the World Bank
may be of special interest to us.
I have personally attended the last three editions of this conference.
Land Information is obviously all about geospati
Dear Codrina and Angelos,
as co-chair of the Open Geoscience committe as you showed interest in
re-vitalising the open data stuff, I would like to invite you to form and
lead a specific working group within the Open Geoscience Committee.
We have already set a WG for open monitoring system which is
On Friday 21 October 2016 12:41:56 Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 10/20/2016 10:53 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> > OSGeo-Live likewise has hundreds of contributors, provides a easy way
> > for new users to find out about Open Source projects, and maintains a
> > high level of quality. It s
Hi all,
On 10/20/2016 10:53 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
OSGeo-Live likewise has hundreds of contributors, provides a easy way
for new users to find out about Open Source projects, and maintains a
high level of quality. It should be promoted. Note, we have considered
taking OSGeo-Live through
Dear Venka,
Good idea! I will gladly start setting the wiki page within the next days.
Cheers,
Codrina
On 21/10/16 12:07, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:
Hi Codrina,
On 2016/10/21 17:09, Codrina Maria Ilie wrote:
Dear Venka, all
I would gladly join forces in a Data4All initiative with OSM, HOT a
Hi all,
I also think this is an excellent idea, and I like the proposed name too.
I would be happy to contribute to such an initiative too.
Best,
Angelos
On 10/21/2016 11:09 AM, Codrina Maria Ilie wrote:
Dear Venka, all
I would gladly join forces in a Data4All initiative with OSM, HOT and
ot
Hi Codrina,
On 2016/10/21 17:09, Codrina Maria Ilie wrote:
Dear Venka, all
I would gladly join forces in a Data4All initiative with OSM, HOT and
other Open Data communities, as well.
That's great! Shall we start with setting up a wiki page and
inviting others to join the Data4All initiative?
On 21/10/16 08:33, Massimiliano Cannata wrote:
> To me using PROJECT for outreach activities is misleading and confusing.
That may actually just be a matter of language. Certainly rules relating
to the development of software products do not apply to the development
of open source data or the deve
Dear Venka, all
I would gladly join forces in a Data4All initiative with OSM, HOT and
other Open Data communities, as well.
Cheers,
Codrina
On 21/10/16 02:27, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:
Regarding "Public Geodata Project", I expressed my views in
the recent e-mail [2]. I would be happy to wo
I strongly disagree in using the name "project" for outreach "activities".
In OSGeo a project is a "software project" and we have:
- osgeo projects (graduated)
- incubating projects (incubating)
- community projects (not big enough to incubate)
Then we have "outreach activities" which are conduct
17 matches
Mail list logo
