Thanks SuchithI love your passion!
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Suchith Anand <
suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> Kiringai and all,
>
> Thanks to all who send your feedbacks from different perspectives to my
> query. Openness means being open to different perspectives ,ideas,
>
Hi Mike,
Thanks for this excellent updates . It is great to see SDI-Open developments
and i am sure it is great opportunity to expand ideas. Good to have Mamata
Akella, from CartoDB, Inc., USA, to speak on this topic and have discussions.
It will be great if the workshop summary is shared
Dear all,
In my experience maintenance and operational costs are far higher with
proprietary software than with open source. With some licenced products
operational costs are actually the largest slice of the budget. But well, that
is only the experience of a single individual.
However, in
Folks,
every now and then terms used in discussions get a bit fuzzy resulting
in misunderstandings. We need to be very clear in our wording to avoid
this.
There are two terms describing the open and free approach:
* Open Source (mostly a development model)
* Free Software (mostly a
Kiringai,
thanks for your thoughts but I cannot quite follow your argument. Or
rather, you are just reiterating an old claim by some proprietary
vendors stating that their software provides more operations security
/due to being developed in a proprietary model/. This claim has never
been
Hi Cameron,
Thank you for raising this important point on the need for coordinated
collaboration with periodic release cycles, development guidelines and
templates, and quality control etc for educational materials for Data Science
training needs. I will bring this up for discussions and
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:56:16PM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> On 2017-03-21 12:19 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> >
> >
> >RE: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo
>
> Yes the FOSS4G-Boston site is in OSGeo Gogs (at
>
