Le 6 mars 2016 à 18:40, Jody Garnett a écrit :
> It may be worth asking the recent Paris code sprint participants "how it
> went" in a separate email thread.
For information, i've began to gather feedbacks from participants here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Paris_Code_Sprint_2016_:_Feedback
O
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 03:40:29PM +, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote:
> The world needs a more peaceful approach to the future.
Well said !
The idea of working 24h/day is what keeps me away from code sprints.
But when there's a chance to have fun and eat togheter, taking a break
from work, spo
e words of Romeo
> to his lusty colleagues on their way to the dance, 'I'll be the
> candleholder and look on.'
>
> -Patrick
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Helena Mitasova [mailto:hmit...@ncsu.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2016 8:49 AM
> To: Hogan,
9 AM
To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
Cc: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
Patrick,
as others have explained, the code or community sprints are indeed an essential
part of open source projects - with developers from all over the globe, this is
the op
common goal of richer ^commons.^ -p
>
>
>
> From: Ian Turton [mailto:ijtur...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2016 7:58 AM
> To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
> Cc: Andrea Aime; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
>
&
@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
I expect Patrick is looking more for social advocacy. Sprints are often devoted
to the boring software development - that if we are lucky can enable so much
more ...
OSGeo is a software foundation, so we will look into the depths of
l.com>
[mailto:andrea.a...@gmail.com<mailto:andrea.a...@gmail.com>] On Behalf Of
Andrea Aime
Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2016 6:32 AM
To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
Cc: Ian Turton; discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
>
>>
>>
>> *From:* andrea.a...@gmail.com [mailto:andrea.a...@gmail.com] *On Behalf
>> Of *Andrea Aime
>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 6, 2016 6:32 AM
>> *To:* Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
>> *Cc:* Ian Turton; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Boa
ndrea.a...@gmail.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Andrea Aime
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 6, 2016 6:32 AM
> *To:* Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
> *Cc:* Ian Turton; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:18 PM, H
AM
To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
Cc: Ian Turton; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
mailto:patrick.ho...@nasa.gov>> wrote:
It appears to me that even these more-substantial-than-hackathons s
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) <
patrick.ho...@nasa.gov> wrote:
> It appears to me that even these more-substantial-than-hackathons sprints
> do not reflect the typical work environment for code development. I will
> suggest that requires more of the 'deep thought' Leonard
:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>]
On Behalf Of Dirk Frigne
Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2016 5:27 AM
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Cc: managementsupp...@geosparc.com<mailto:managementsupp...@geosparc.com>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
dent winners of the Europa Challenge.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > -Patrick
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:*Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of
> > *dirk frigne
> >
> > *Sent:*Wednesday, March 02, 20
exclusively to student winners of the Europa Challenge.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Patrick
>
>
>
> *From:*Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of
> *dirk frigne
>
> *Sent:*Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:23 AM
>
> *T
enge.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Patrick
>
>
>
> *From:*Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of
> *dirk frigne
>
> *Sent:*Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:23 AM
>
> *To:*discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>
> *Cc:*managementsupp...@dfc.be
winners of the Europa Challenge.
Kind regards,
-Patrick
From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of dirk frigne
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:23 AM
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: managementsupp...@dfc.be
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
Maxi,
I
Maxi,
I think we can solve that concern by divide the budget in 2 parts:
Assumption that we know already the really strategic code sprints for 2016.
(like the FOSS4G codes sprint in Bonn)
>From past years the board can make a good assumption what the budget
for the strategic code sprints should
f
> Venkatesh Raghavan Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 10:25 PM
> To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I agree with you. My suggestion to spread out the code sprint was only to
> ensure that the com
(650) 269-2788 (cell)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
> Venkatesh Raghavan
> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 10:25 PM
> To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
>
>
Dear all,
the fact that made me rise this discussion is:
- we are facing more and more sprint code support requests (really really
great)
- we do have limited budget (we may not be able to support all the requests)
So, how to prevent, for example, that a request in September for a very
strategic s
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
> wrote:
>
> For my two-pence, which won't even get you a cup of chai in Mumbai
Correct. The current going rate is about 15¢ or 10p.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
scuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesh
Raghavan
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 10:25 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
Hi Mike,
I agree with you. My suggestion to spread out the code sprint was only to
e
Hi Mike,
I agree with you. My suggestion to spread out the code sprint was only
to ensure that the community has some idea some idea when
the sprint could be expected and when/how to request OSGeo
Foundation for support.
I would like to see more an more code sprints (also incubation sprints
etc.
On 20 February 2016 at 01:07, Massimiliano Cannata <
massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote:
> With this mail I would personally like to ask a few questions the
> different communities:
>
> - who is intended to present a fund request for sprint code in 2016. This
> will give an idea of the number of
All,
I don't think there is a reason to have code sprints coordinate their times
to spread them out over the year. They should run when they need to run. We
don't have a cash flow issue that would require this.
And for the Paris Code Sprint, although a request was made, it does not
appear at this
, February 21, 2016 6:41 PM
To: Venkatesh Raghavan; OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
Venka,
I’m just suggesting that it be included under “Project Plans” here
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Paris_Code_Sprint_2016
Just asking that one line ‘Europa Challenge
m: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesh
Raghavan
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:35 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
Dear All,
Considering OSGeo budget for 2016, I think, it could be
possible to supp
eo.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesh
Raghavan
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:35 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
Dear All,
Considering OSGeo budget for 2016, I think, it could be
possible to support 3 or 4 Code Sprints at similar
sponsors
] On Behalf Of Venkatesh
Raghavan
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:35 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Board
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
Dear All,
Considering OSGeo budget for 2016, I think, it could be
possible to support 3 or 4 Code Sprints at similar
sponsorship
Dear All,
Considering OSGeo budget for 2016, I think, it could be
possible to support 3 or 4 Code Sprints at similar
sponsorship levels for each sprint as in the past.
I would like to propose to have code spread across three or four
periods across the year e.g Jan-March, April-June, July-Sept, O
30 matches
Mail list logo
