Hi Kishor,
nice to know you are going for the last Dasehris of this summer.
Please do visit OSGeo India at Hyderabad and Pune.
Cheers
Ravi Kumar
Venkatesh Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: P Kishor wrote:
...
>
> Now I go back to my remaining mangoes of the season here in the still
> hot Luckn
P Kishor wrote:
...
Now I go back to my remaining mangoes of the season here in the still
hot Lucknow, India.
Just back form India, myself. Hope you have time to look up the
OSGeo folks in India (Hyderabad, Pune).
Venka
___
Discuss mailing list
Disc
Hi Frank
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I've yet to return to some of the interesting email since I went away
on the challenges in the developing world (though many of them - at a
glance - seems similar to the challenges we face in the developed
world).
Think are reffering to the e-mail from our
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 20:54 -0700, Dave Patton wrote:
> P Kishor wrote:
>
> > I believe pegging Board-membership to geography is a good thing
>
> > I also believe that while one can contribute as much while being an
> > ordinary member as opposed to a charter or a Board member (I became a
> > cha
On 8/17/07, Dave Patton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P Kishor wrote:
>
> > I believe pegging Board-membership to geography is a good thing
>
> > I also believe that while one can contribute as much while being an
> > ordinary member as opposed to a charter or a Board member (I became a
> > charter
P Kishor wrote:
I believe pegging Board-membership to geography is a good thing
I also believe that while one can contribute as much while being an
ordinary member as opposed to a charter or a Board member (I became a
charter member only a couple of months ago), Board membership could be
an i
Thanks everyone for weighing in (even though I am responding only to
Frank's email here). Any discussion is better than no discussion.
That said, I actually respectfully disagree with most all of you. I
believe pegging Board-membership to geography is a good thing, and it
does not naturally extrap
P Kishor wrote:
Hi all,
I would love hear from others about what they think of geography-based
Board seats. Please weigh in.
Puneet,
I'm coming to this late. It is my opinion that "hard coding" specific
numbers of board seats from specific geographic locales is not a great idea
for some of t
On 13-Aug-07, at 2:55 PM, Dave McIlhagga wrote:
One of the benefits of the open source model is it breaks down the
artificial geographic barriers among it's participants. Open Source
is about quality of contributions from wherever they may come
around the world.
On a parallel idea... open
er interfaces, and
support for global or "foreign" unit and coordinate systems.
The Sunburned Surveyor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave McIlhagga
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSGeo Discus
One of the benefits of the open source model is it breaks down the
artificial geographic barriers among it's participants. Open Source
is about quality of contributions from wherever they may come around
the world.
As much as we all would like to see maximum geographic representation
in O
The original post used geography as an initial example but also mentioned there
are
most certainly other balances that could make more sense - Steve
>>> On 8/13/2007 at 1:26 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11-Aug-07, at 7:51 AM, P Kish
I think it's a terrible idea, unless we really consider geography to
be the true organizing principle behind OSGeo. Why not project-based
board seats? Or language? Ethnicity? How about all three! We can
have a matrix board.
First, is there a problem: is our board representation bad rela
On 11-Aug-07, at 7:51 AM, P Kishor wrote:
On 8/10/07, Steve Lime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all: Perhaps this has been discussed before, but... Given the
apparent desire to maintain geographic diversity amongst OSgeo
leadership perhaps in the future we might consider regionally
based boa
Hi all,
I would love hear from others about what they think of geography-based
Board seats. Please weigh in.
PS: If anyone is CDG tomorrow morning at 8.20a local time, page me,
but make sure to wear your OSGeo swag so I can recognize you... I'll
be there for two hours waiting for my flight to DEL
On 8/10/07, Steve Lime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all: Perhaps this has been discussed before, but... Given the apparent
> desire to maintain geographic diversity amongst OSgeo leadership perhaps in
> the future we might consider regionally based board seats.
This is absolutely the most won
Hi all: Perhaps this has been discussed before, but... Given the apparent
desire to maintain geographic diversity amongst OSgeo leadership perhaps in the
future we might consider regionally based board seats. That is, you have
representatives from:
North America, Europe, Africa, Asia, South/Cen
17 matches
Mail list logo
