Hi all,
I step back too.
I don't want to rise problems or whatever, and I think that LOC can decide
what they think is better, and after all its their conference ;-)
I have already clearly stated my point of view, and I have just to add that
in Denver the Journal was the same that is proposed
Hi Jo,
Indeed I fully agree with you.
There seemed to be some confusion on past vs present. My goal was only
to clear that up.
I'll step back and let the Academic committee decide on all that.
-jeff
On 13-01-28 10:59 AM, Jo Cook wrote:
> Hi Jeff and the rest of the list,
>
> I'm speaking f
Hi Jeff and the rest of the list,
I'm speaking from a position of ignorance about this, but surely the
academic track submission process will need to change from year to year
depending on the journal that papers are to be submitted to? Surely the
process is driven mainly by the demands and deadlin
Here's another thought for our "lessons learned" wiki: For the next
FOSS4G event, the first step in the Academic submission process could be
an "extended abstract" due for something like Feb 1st. How I am coming
up with that idea? On this past Friday was a deadline for a "CoastGIS"
event, and al
Hello Barend, Venka, Andy, Max, Nick, and Puneet,
First I want to thank the Academic chairs Barend and Franz-Josef for
volunteering for the management of the difficult process of the
selection of papers for the FOSS4G 2013 event. I am impressed by their
passion and dedication to getting papers pu
Just a quick reply:
1- we did publish the Call for Papers, with the current setup, already in
October last year. Details about the publication outlets and numbers we
aim for (8-10 in Transactions of GIS and 10-12 in OSGEO Journal) are in
there, and were on the website from that time. We did set th
This discussion reinforces the notion that every revolutionary idea rises
through successes to become ordinary.
MUM which begat OSGeo Conf which begat FOSS4G was truly revolutionary. A bunch
of folks who had never met other than over email listservs met face to face
finally. All was great. The
Hello,
Thanks for discussing this important topic.
The last global FOSS4G editions gathered on average 800+ attendees i think.
I have no clues on how many of them sumitted or attended the academic
track, but i know that this side of the conference is really important, and
that the rules should no
Hi,
FWIW, I have to say that as far as i remember (and I participate at all of
the FOSS4G meeting from Bangkok to Denver) I always:
- submitted and abstract,
- got acceptance or not as presenter,
- provided a paper for proceeding, and if selected for publication.
In Denver this process led me to a
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of b.j.kob...@utwente.nl
Sent: 25 January 2013 11:26
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Call for Papers for FOSS4G 2013 Academic Track
Dear Venka and Massimiliano,
I feel we have to defen
Dear Venka and Massimiliano,
I feel we have to defend the Foss4G2013 AT a bit here (as AT co-chairs we
should ;-)
It is actually not true that "Previous FOSS4G's had abstract review by the
academic committee
and selected authors were asked to submit full papers closer to the
conference dates."
Bo
11 matches
Mail list logo
