Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Cyber Resilience Act staying informed on updates

Even, I think we will need to let this rest for a bit. As I understand it each bullet point on this topic has been shared; and they wrote some clarifications elsewhere about what they intended. I now saw a photo online and those two quotes are actually all there is to work with. > the provision

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Cyber Resilience Act staying informed on updates

Thanks for the context and setting expectations. -- Jody Garnett On Dec 8, 2023 at 12:57:53 AM, Luí­s Moreira de Sousa < luis.de.so...@protonmail.ch> wrote: > Dear Jody, > > thank you for the update. The last "trilogue" took place on the 30th of > November and OSS was finally considered. A

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Cyber Resilience Act staying informed on updates

Hi Jody, thanks for the update. The clarification of point 3 is still fuzzy to me. What do they actually mean by "monetised by manufacturers". Is monetizing only when the software is open source but people have to pay to use it on SaaS or similar models ? Otherwise if it is about money being

[OSGeo-Discuss] Cyber Resilience Act staying informed on updates

Follow up to November discussion and blog post asking OSGeo community to be informed. 1. At the end November Europe lawmakers agreed on something: