Hi Edzer,
Thank you for your timely email.
I agree that the functionality of the community version has been
constrained and have noted your comments below on aa earlier thread on the
Rasdaman lists that proceeded down a similar line with direct responses to
issues avoided through diverting the d
Cameron, my comment is in-line:
On 21/05/16 14:06, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Hi Edzer,
> Thank you for raising this topic questioning the value of radsaman
> community edition. It is pertinent considering recent discussions about
> Rasdaman incubation.
>
> Peter, your comments about programmers wa
Thanks, Peter, for the interesting opinions, but I see them as further
divergence into other matters, not a discussion of my statement.
I'd love to discuss all issues you mention some time. Did I ever tell
you I owe my professor position to my open source contributions? Are
there others on this li
Actually for some historical context here, the reason the rules around
establishing PSC were established the way they are, was to ensure that
Autodesk’s MapGuide project would not be dominated in the “Benevolent Dictator
Model” that may otherwise have occurred.
The PSC could not comprise more t
Peter,
It's impressive that 20 TB is being served out by the community edition.
However, the point that Edzer brings up (and that I was unaware of) causes
me even more concern regarding the language used in service of promoting
the potential OSGeo version of rasdaman around it's comparison to othe
I think OSGeo should stay out of the business of weighing in on how companies
decide to commercialize technologies, so long as they respect the licensing
terms.
We and many companies use MapServer for instance at the heart of our
proprietary stacks, which is simply another flavor of the open co
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Cameron Shorter <
> cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd be interested to hear opinions of others in the field as to whether
>> Rasdaman community version is of value for real-world production systems by
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Cameron Shorter
wrote:
> I'd be interested to hear opinions of others in the field as to whether
> Rasdaman community version is of value for real-world production systems by
> itself.
>
I guess that would depend on the needs of the production system itself, and
Hi Edzer,
Thank you for raising this topic questioning the value of radsaman
community edition. It is pertinent considering recent discussions about
Rasdaman incubation.
Peter, your comments about programmers wanting to get paid for their
work is valid, but does not provide justification for
oh, just looking at the subject again:
several service providers believe indeed rasdaman community does offer a
significant advantage:
- see the download figures on www.rasdaman.org
- concretely, see www.planetserver.eu which is running rasdaman community on - I
believe - about 20 TB of Planetary
Hm, first of all: this is opening a different thread, talking about
functionality of rasdaman community. Next, it is based on assumptions - without
details (because off topic): conclusions are wrong.
But to respond to the core message emphasized in the first paragraph: I
respectfully disagree. In
As a scientist, I teach my students that for doing science it is a
requirement to work with open source software, because only then
workflows are fully transparent and can be reproduced by other
scientists without prohibitive license costs. Currently, working
with large amounts of earth observation
12 matches
Mail list logo
