Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly ... and there is
still an open discussion about which badge to use for projects in
incubation.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> Bingo. 1) is fixed. http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ ...
>
Bingo. 1) is fixed. http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ ...
Hopefully they can add the default filter tomorrow.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> Just got off the phone with the vendor. They are going to do 2 things ASAP.
>
> 1) Add the badge. Its
Just got off the phone with the vendor. They are going to do 2 things ASAP.
1) Add the badge. Its actually there, but is not showing for some reason.
2) Add a filter in the megamenu for the type of project, and have the
OSGeo filter checked initially so ONLY OSGeo projects are showing for
now.
I'm not sure at all, but it was a suggestion.
Can someone open a ticket on the github so we can have a discussion there.
There are 2 issues.
1) We need to be able to identify which are OSGeo incubated projects
vs others. This is a technical issue that will get solved quickly (see
my previous
Are you sure ordering by rank is a good idea (whatever the rank is)?
That leaves small projects behind...
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> I should also point out that it has been suggested that we have a way
> to 'rank' projects in these pages
I should also point out that it has been suggested that we have a way
to 'rank' projects in these pages somehow that indicates their
popularity ... for instance when we have a page of all OSGeo projects
like the one linked below. Perhaps we can use the number of GitHub
stars or some objective
loema...@gmail.com>
> An: "Maria Antonia Brovelli" <maria.brove...@polimi.it>
> Cc: "Helena Mitasova" <hmit...@ncsu.edu>, "Paulo van Breugel"
> <p.vanbreu...@gmail.com>, "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>,
> &q
On 16/08/17 15:29, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Note that several of these issues are on the list to be discussed with
the vendor today.
There is also the issue of actual OSGeo projects that simply havent
responded to various requests for input. I've had to just add them in
myself so they are there
itasova" <hmit...@ncsu.edu>, "Paulo van Breugel"
<p.vanbreu...@gmail.com>, "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>,
"Helmut Kudrnovsky" <hel...@web.de>
Betreff: Gentle reminder reg: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new
website dra
Note that several of these issues are on the list to be discussed with
the vendor today.
There is also the issue of actual OSGeo projects that simply havent
responded to various requests for input. I've had to just add them in
myself so they are there and can be hooked up to the choose a project
Thanks Maxi,
Freeze time will indeed give us time to assemble all feedback, discuss and
prioritise for further improvements.
I was not even aware of the holiday season ;-) Enjoy!
Kind regards,
Marc Vloemans
> Op 16 aug. 2017 om 09:10 heeft Massimiliano Cannata
>
Marc
I agree, great and huge work was done.
Maybe a freezing period before of any public release/presentation would be
good?
We're not in a hurry...
With more time review and discussion can run smoothly?
Also, We're in the middle of the holiday season and also vacation time is
limited :-) to
Dear all,
I feel that the "tail is wagging the dog" as they say. And we are on the brink
of pushing valuable volunteers too far. Again.
Your feed back on the website is needed, welcomed and enlisted, but please be
it combined with some actionable way to go forward and a helping hand. The site
13 matches
Mail list logo