I agree on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (this list will be spammed even before
starting... )
should we proceed creating the list?
does anyone disagree?
ciao
Lorenzo
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
I'd not go so far as to create a list yet -- I'm not sure we know what
we're all
Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
Not all of us are interested in standards development, just as not all of us
are interested in FundRaising or Metadata or... I'd much prefer to keep the
main list for announcements and general topics, not specific threads.
P Kishor wrote:,
Might I ask, what
I guess this thread is pretty hot, there are many sub-threads and maybe
a good solution could be to set up a mailing list, for the beginning,
as: ogc AT osgeo.org
Trying to be practical I can offer myself to administer the list as I'm
doing with the Spanish Chapter and the Spanish GIS Book.
...
-mpg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Becchi
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:15 AM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO OGC spec development
I guess this thread is pretty hot, there are many sub
Hi Lorenzo,
On 17 Jul 2007, at 1:09 PM, Lorenzo Becchi wrote:
Jeroen, all, very important thread to me too.
generic questions:
- what would it mean to create an OGC Committee?
A place where those involved / interested in OGC spec development
connect with each other and where OSGEO
community in OGC
standard development.
The Sunburned Surveyor
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen Ticheler
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO OGC spec development
Hi
: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:28 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO OGC spec development
But there is now officially an individual membership category. Info
isn't up on the web site yet, but I think its $400/year. You can
qualify if no one else (such as a full-time employer
Landon Blake wrote:
It appears that some of my concerns about problems with OGC membership
remain in place. I'm disappointed to learn that non-members are no
longer allowed to join in the discussion.
The individual membership option also presents challenges for some open
source developers
I
Hi all,
Last week I attended the Open Geospatial Consortium Technical
Committee (OGC-TC) meeting in Paris.
For those not to familiar with this meeting, it consists of a series
of Working Group (WG) meetings that mostly run around the development
of specifications (or standards if you
: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO OGC spec development
Hi all,
Last week I attended the Open Geospatial Consortium Technical
Committee (OGC-TC) meeting in Paris.
For those not to familiar with this meeting, it consists of a
series of Working Group (WG) meetings that mostly run around the
development
Thanks for the update Jeroen - going to add one more to your list...
Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
With this email I would like to touch upon two issues that I think are
relevant to OSGEO. I hope bringing this up can trigger some discussion
on how OSGEO would best benefit from the OGC spec
11 matches
Mail list logo
