On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> On 7/27/12 12:55 AM, Alex Mandel wrote:
>
>> This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
>> appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance of LGPL of various firms and
>> I'm also sure many of
On 07/27/2012 11:09 AM, Adrian Custer wrote:
>
> Third, the decision strikes me as between honoring the intent of
> contributors to Geotools 2.6 and honoring the desire of the Geotoolkit
> contributors to take forwards their code base and build a community
> after having been rejected by OSGeo. Pe
On 12-07-27 3:09 PM, Adrian Custer wrote:
>
> [2] I personally find the failure to make Martin a charter member as one
> glaring indictment of OSGeo and its community, revealing the inwards
> looking favoritism and lack of exploration beyond. There are few people
> as passionate, knowledgeable, or
Hello everyone,
On 7/27/12 12:55 AM, Alex Mandel wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance of LGPL of various firms and
I'm also sure many of us can name firms that have no issue shipping LGPL
components.
Aside fr
