iginal Message-
From: Discuss On Behalf Of Nyall Dawson
Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2020 3:46 PM
To: Even Rouault
Cc: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Free licensed alternative to ESRI map fonts
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 01:13, Even Rouault wrote:
for my understanding, and hopefully he
f - MIL-HDBK-857A and MIL-DTL-89045/A
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you're prepared to deal with converting CGM to whatever that font
> thing is, you can download the definitions from the NGA GWG Portrayal
> Working Group at https://gwg.nga.mil/pfg_documents.php (ex
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Free licensed alternative to ESRI map fonts
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 01:13, Even Rouault wrote:
for my understanding, and hopefully help others, I assume the issue is that you
have a style definition where there are tuples of (font_identifier,
symbol_identifier_in_the
//gwg.nga.mil/pfg_documents.php (expect a cert
>> >> warning)
>> >>
>> >> The ESRI Mil2525C Modifiers and some of those MilSym / MilMod things
>> >> might be MIL-STD-2525 (aka STANAG APP-6) symbology. Not usually treated
>> >> as a font tho
;
> >> The ESRI Mil2525C Modifiers and some of those MilSym / MilMod things
> might be MIL-STD-2525 (aka STANAG APP-6) symbology. Not usually treated as
> a font though
> >>
> >> Brad
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Discuss On Behalf
nt
>> though
>>
>> Brad
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Discuss On Behalf Of Nyall Dawson
>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2020 3:46 PM
>> To: Even Rouault
>> Cc: OSGeo Discussions
>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Free licensed al
.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Discuss mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> > On Behalf Of Nyall Dawson
Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2020 3:46 PM
To: Even Rouault mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com> >
Cc: OSGeo Discussions mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Di
>> a font though
>>
>> Brad
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Discuss On Behalf Of Nyall Dawson
>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2020 3:46 PM
>> To: Even Rouault
>> Cc: OSGeo Discussions
>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Free licensed al
all Dawson
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2020 3:46 PM
> To: Even Rouault
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Free licensed alternative to ESRI map fonts
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 01:13, Even Rouault
> wrote:
>
> > for my understanding, and hop
ubject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Free licensed alternative to ESRI map fonts
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 01:13, Even Rouault wrote:
> for my understanding, and hopefully help others, I assume the issue is that
> you have a style definition where there are tuples of (font_identifier,
> symbol_identi
Note this is quite the legal trap, many governments have contributed to
these fonts, and then are not in a position to use the result with open
source software such as GeoServer (even though we have TTF symbol support).
Specifically for the US fonts above it may be possible to source the
original
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 01:13, Even Rouault wrote:
> for my understanding, and hopefully help others, I assume the issue is that
> you have a style definition where there are tuples of (font_identifier,
> symbol_identifier_in_the_font) to define the styling of layers with point
> geometries, rig
Nyall,
for my understanding, and hopefully help others, I assume the issue is that you
have a style
definition where there are tuples of (font_identifier,
symbol_identifier_in_the_font) to
define the styling of layers with point geometries, right ?
Or possibly some dataset layers whose fields
I think that is a good idea, and something our marketing committee could
very carefully do.
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:39 PM Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> One common road block which I find I am encountering when
> organisations are wanting to transition to open source software is
> that the
14 matches
Mail list logo