wnshall wrote:
> Can you elaborate on what you mean by "... all mixed up with my local
> music."? My expectation is that once Rhapsody has synced your local
> music collection, My Library on Rhapsody would display
> Albums/Artists/Tracks from both your local music library and your
> previously e
Wow, the lowly ARM-CPU-powered empeg car stereo maintained playlists
longer than 30k tracks easily, shuffling, reshuffling, changing track
order, adding tracks, removing tracks, all without skipping a beat.
There seems to be some serious inefficiency and possible
underdevelopment with SB's playli
MelonMonkey wrote:
> Wow, the lowly ARM-CPU-powered empeg car stereo maintained playlists
> longer than 30k tracks easily, shuffling, reshuffling, changing track
> order, adding tracks, removing tracks, all without skipping a beat.
> There seems to be some serious inefficiency and possible
> und
Ikabob wrote:
>
> LOGITECH is a very reputable company and I do not believe they want to
> injure their reputation by breaching their word to so many trusting
> consumers. They'd have a lot to lose credibility-wise in the future. So,
> I believe the director of products, an official representati
It seems like the some more blog comments now have been moderated, at
least a few more is now visible including some answers.
There wasn't much news, but a few things were clarified:
- They "actively" plan to support mysqueezebox.com for the "foreseeable
future", so people who are worried it wil
> Logitech builds cool and well constructed hardware, but if the device
> relies on software stay away - the products that depend on code
> eventually fall behind the curve and Logitech does not seem to have the
> resources or consistent coding practices to keep up fixing it, so they
> loose inter
erland wrote:
> However, the next step for Logitech is now to show if they are really
> committed to support Squeezebox users and make the new UE product line a
> success or if the answers are just empty words.
"Next step"? How so? What does Logitech gain from continuing to support
Squeezebox? F
jimbobvfr400 wrote:
> Really liking this so far.
>
> I do have a weird issue with the way it works when you select tracks. If
> I choose play in the default option in preferences then as it should it
> adds the whole album, so if I choose artist - album - track as I
> normally do, if I choose s
erland wrote:
> They will not provide an upgrade path for the Touch or any other
> Squeezebox except for Squeezebox Radio. Hopefully this means they have
> an UE product without built-in speakers in their roadmap, if they don't,
> the UE Smart Radio line is more or less doomed at its current pri
epoch1970 wrote:
> A UE radio without speakers is called a bluetooth-capable smartphone. I
> doubt they want to try the audio-video combo receiver any time soon, and
> the swift demise of google's Q doesn't vote in favor of an Internet-only
> hifi-class receiver either.
> I wouldn't bet the next
JJZolx wrote:
> "Next step"? How so? What does Logitech gain from continuing to support
> Squeezebox? Financially, nothing. $0.
>
> Beyond keeping mysb.com afloat, what are you expecting in terms of
> support? An updated server that addresses the many hundreds of valid
> bugs on file? Repairs of
MelonMonkey wrote:
> Wow, the lowly ARM-CPU-powered empeg car stereo maintained playlists
> longer than 30k tracks easily, shuffling, reshuffling, changing track
> order, adding tracks, removing tracks, all without skipping a beat.
> There seems to be some serious inefficiency and possible
> und
erland wrote:
> Based on the responses, I would expect a bug correction now and then,
> maybe a bit less active than what we have seen during the last 12 months
> (after the Revue shutdown).
It couldn't get much less active.
Face it. It's dead.
JJZolx wrote:
> It couldn't get much less active.
>
> Face it. It's dead.
>
It answers when I ping it, so something must be still alive :-)
erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124
View this
MeSue wrote:
>
> This is something from the Logitech forum thread about the NuLOOQ, but
> it seems appropriate here:
>
> http://forums.logitech.com/t5/Design-Controllers-and/NuLooq-Navigator-in-CS4/m-p/305697#M582
The last post in that thread is November 2011. Did Logitech ever release
the "so
cncb wrote:
> A Raspberry Pi dedicated to running a full-screen version of Squeezeplay
> with digital audio output seems almost perfect...
I am doing my best seem to be mostly alsa diver issues being the main
stoppers that said I have had overs two hours of perfect audio
out...(doh jinxed it jus
Mnyb and others before him wrote:
> Humor is much better than the other response you can get when saying
> something wrong/silly or stupid.
> Are routerhero completely unaware of the slow death the whole squeezebox
> ecosystem has been put trough for years ?
It took some time before I decided wh
pallfreeman wrote:
> The last post in that thread is November 2011. Did Logitech ever release
> the "source code" (drivers, I presume)?
Not as far as I know.
MeSue's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?useri
erland wrote:
> It seems like the some more blog comments now have been moderated, at
> least a few more is now visible including some answers.
>
> There wasn't much news, but a few things were clarified:
>
>
> - They will not provide an upgrade path for the Touch or any other
> Squeezebo
Well, do we seriously believe they build up all of the new
infrastructure just for a re-branded radio?
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/
pippin wrote:
> Well, do we seriously believe they build up all of the new
> infrastructure just for a re-branded radio?
It is not such a big investment for them in these days of virtual
servers and CDNs. They could be testing the market for a simplified
(reduced functionality) device before tak
21 matches
Mail list logo
