I I'm sorry if this is a silly question but I'm trying to weigh up the
options here. Will the Community Squeeze OS ever be able to run on a
Squeezebox Touch?
Corelli45's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?use
JJZolx wrote:
>
> As I understand it, work is being done on creating output for an HDMI
> display, so it could be hooked up to a TV or small LCD. I'm guessing
> there are plans for an IR interface, also, but it's all a bit fuzzy as
> to what would be included, or when this would all come togethe
So that's true.I didn't use it,but as you say like that,i don't wanna
use it any more..what about this ?
newworld11's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevice
JackOfAll wrote:
>
> ickstream from what info has been given, is a cloud based music delivery
> platform. Their client API is not based on how an LMS client currently
> talks to the LMS server. Possibly the Touch could have a applet that
> connected directly back to the ickstream cloud for music
dasmueller wrote:
> That's encouraging. It will however leave a segment of potential users w
> the dilemma of how to control the system if they do not have a
> smartphone, tablet or Pc in the listening area to control it-probably a
> small group and not the target user.
Another option would be t
Suggestion:
When these are assembled and packaged, as with Squeezeboxes, can the MAC
addresses of both the wired and wireless ethernet interfaces be placed
on a label on the bottom of device?
JJZolx's Profile: http://forum
That's encouraging. It will however leave a segment of potential users w
the dilemma of how to control the system if they do not have a
smartphone, tablet or Pc in the listening area to control it-probably a
small group and not the target user.
---
dasmueller wrote:
> 1. For the novice non techie person running a Windows 7 or 8 system, a
> Mac system, is this going to be a reasonably easy setup process to
> utilize what appears to be a nice new assembly of both hardware and
> software ? I certainly learned a great deal here before buying m
I am unable to play Rhapsody (getting an Internal Error message) and
also unable to get my Boom to connect to MySB.com. Says it can't find
the address. Anyone else experiencing issues? Could this be the
beginning of the end? (Let's be honest, the end started a long time
ago.)
---
In addition t this thread there are the ones below which appear to be
related in one form or another.
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?98467-Pre-Announcement-ickStream
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?98521-Announce-Community-Squeeze
My questions would be
1. For the novic
pablolie wrote:
> I am not sure when eventually the electronics would give out -they seem
> well build- but if I consider another 10-15 years of lifetime before I
> consider an alternative (not all that unusual with audio equipment), I
> am looking at the current LMS software becoming incompatibl
pippin wrote:
> You can do that with ickStream, if you like. But what is your "cloud at
> home"? Most people don't want to have a server running 24/7 and I, for
> myself, enjoy having access to music I don't yet know. This will not go
> away, people will use online services for a lot of their mus
Triode wrote:
> To add to this - we specifically picked the Wandboard for two reasons
> (and you can see some agonising on this on the thread re hardware):
> 1) We know it supports USB Dacs well as it has hardware ehci based
> scheduling. Other platforms such as Beaglebone and Pi have serious
>
JackOfAll wrote:
> And you are more than welcome to use another solution. I have a drawer
> full of ARM hardware, that I have fiddled with for a week, then
> discarded for various reasons. I haven't found an achilles heel with the
> Wandboard yet, even if it is overkill for for a simple client pl
The wandboard consists of two pieces, a cpu module and a carrier board
that has the peripheral interfaces. The module uses an emerging standard
(the EDM standard) which several companies are supporting. We are
currently using the wandboard in its entirety because it is functional
as is. What I am
JackOfAll wrote:
> The thing is this.. It's a community project, by the community, for
> the community. It is going to depend on more people from the community
> getting involved. The people that are involved so far on the development
> side, can only do so much.
Totally understood. I may be
Mark Miksis wrote:
> The Wandboard seems like overkill for those of us not wanting to run LMS
> on the player. There will probably be less expensive player-only
> solutions, especially if the Raspberry Pi ever gets their USB drivers
> fixed.
And you are more than welcome to use another solution
TheShanMan wrote:
> I hope that this effort will ultimately include a future for
> squeezeserver running on windows, support for older clients
The thing is this.. It's a community project, by the community, for
the community. It is going to depend on more people from the community
gettin
Thank you John, that clears it up for me.
Interesting developments on multiple fronts here.
maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9080
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread
JackOfAll wrote:
> The Wandboard Dual is the preferred hardware platform. This will not
> change. The JS DAC carrier board has been designed to work with the
> Wandboard and its EDM connector. If you wish to use the JS designed DAC
> carrier board when it becomes available, it will only work with
maggior wrote:
>
> Perhaps I missed in in the 79 pages of posts, but are there plans for
> how this hardware will be disceminated? I see where John was soldering
> components to a PCB. Has somebody signed up to mass produce the
> hardware?
Another announcement will be made, specifically conce
froth wrote:
> So is this different to what the ick squeeze post that pippen posted?
> Or is it complementary? Or is it compitision?
>
> It all confusing to me.
Yes, it is confusing. Community Squeeze is about supporting LMS, the
Squeezelite software player, and a Community Based hardware pla
I'm interested to see where this goes. I'm probably not interested in a
stand alone server though. I hope that this effort will ultimately
include a future for squeezeserver running on windows, support for older
clients (I have a slimp3 and an SB1), and support for Pandora that
doesn't time out (t
Furry wrote:
> As a potential 'early user', I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1. Is it likely that the Wandboard will persist, as the preferred
> hardware platform?
>
> 2. If it doesn't persist, then is it likely that the Wandboard will
> (also) be supported for future software releases?
The W
OK, I've got this working pretty well. If you set the maximum offset to
a very high number, the plugin will automatically detect when the text
reaches the edge of the screen and reverses direction at that point. No
more sticking at the side of the screen! It also now functions properly
in single l
Furry wrote:
> As a potential 'early user', I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1. Is it likely that the Wandboard will persist, as the preferred
> hardware platform?
>
> 2. If it doesn't persist, then is it likely that the Wandboard will
> (also) be supported for future software releases?
My un
Simplicity.
That's what you get that you don't have now. Drop a CD in the drive and
it shows up on your SqueezeBox 5 minutes later. One box, no hassles.
agillis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2
As a potential 'early user', I have a couple of questions:
1. Is it likely that the Wandboard will persist, as the preferred
hardware platform?
2. If it doesn't persist, then is it likely that the Wandboard will
(also) be supported for future software releases?
Marsupial wrote:
> Can the community squeeze OS run on other hardware?
yes
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98521
___
Can the community squeeze OS run on other hardware?
Marsupial's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59182
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98521
froth wrote:
> So is this different to what the ick squeeze post that pippen posted?
> Or is it complementary? Or is it compitision?
>
> It all confusing to me.
My understanding: community squeeze is an "operating system" that can
be installed on hardware to emulate a squeezebox player. The
So is this different to what the ick squeeze post that pippen posted?
Or is it complementary? Or is it compitision?
It all confusing to me.
froth's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11878
View this
maggior wrote:
> I read through some of that thread and the wiki article was
> interesting.
>
> Perhaps I missed in in the 79 pages of posts, but are there plans for
> how this hardware will be disceminated? I see where John was soldering
> copmonents to a PCB. Has somebody signed up to mass p
I read through some of that thread and the wiki article was
interesting.
Perhaps I missed in in the 79 pages of posts, but are there plans for
this hardware will be disceminated?
maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevice
Maggior:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?97881-Community-Funded-Squeezebox-Replacement-Would-you-be-interested
asplundj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=53571
View this thread: http://
maggior wrote:
> What form will the "community hardware" take? Community software
> projects make sense, but I've never heard of a community hardware
> project. Will it be a parts list? A kit?
'Wikipedia: Open Source Hardware'
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_hardware)
What form will the "community hardware" take? Community software
projects make sense, but I've never heard of a community hardware
project. Will it be a parts list? A kit?
It's interesting to see this little projects taking root. Hopefully one
or all of them will take off.
-
Consider putting instructions and perhaps a wiki on the
communitysqueeze.org website. As this thread becomes numerous pages,
and new threads get formed, having a central point of important
information very useful.
It's too bad the squeezebox wiki is no longer maintained.
Paul
---
According to the Wanboard site there are two versions of the hardware
available. A Solo and a Dual version. The Dual version also has wifi.
Which of these two boards are required for this project?
Pascal Hibon's Profile: ht
banned for life wrote:
> I was running LMS on a Vista Pro Dual-core 3Ghz with 3GB of memory.
> Performance was lousy. I run Vortexbox now in a VMWare Workstation
> virtual machine with 384MB of memory and the performance is outstanding.
> I actually run two copies: one for in the house and one po
40 matches
Mail list logo
