I have an external DAC you can borrow if you'd like to try something
'different' before buying.
It's nothing special. a Zhaolu iirc, that had all the component
upgrades. Something to play with though, if you're willing to pay for
shipping.
--
aubuti wrote:
> I think most people would say that title goes to the Transporter, but
> for sound quality per dollar (or euro or pound or peso) the Touch is it.
agree!
edit: but then again, my Touch plus Benchmark DAC cost more than my
Transporter
-
sherington wrote:
> Oncwe you have the backup situation sorted, go for the Touch - the best
> quality sound out of SB ever - to date
I think most people would say that title goes to the Transporter, but
for sound quality per dollar (or euro or pound or peso) the Touch is it.
---
Oncwe you have the backup situation sorted, go for the Touch - the best
quality sound out of SB ever - to date
sherington's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2587
View this thread: http://forums.slimd
bigsur78 wrote:
>
> That said, I guess the real question I was getting at in my rambling
> post was whether an SB3 plus a Dacmagic or a similarly priced DAC would
> sound better than a Touch.
>
I don't have any personal experience of DacMagic, but here is a post
from someone that have:
http://f
Thanks all for your replies.
You're all completely right... the next thing I need is another external
hard drive to back things up. That has been in the back of my head and I
should get it done.
And I understand the speaker thing as well... though I'm currently still
enjoying what I'm hearing with
bigsur78 wrote:
>
> I figure I have a few options, and am wondering what would give me the
> biggest boost in sound (on the living room system)
> 1. I could upgrade to a Squeezebox Touch.
> 2. I could keep the SB3 and add a cheap DAC, perhaps a used Cambridge
> Audio DAC magic
> 3. I could upgra
jean2 wrote:
> You should !
>
>
>
> The grass is always greener on the other side, isn't it ? Please don't
> fall into that trap, it's an addiction.
>
>
>
> It seems that with audio, price increase exponentially for diminishing
> returns. As you are happy with your current system, just enjo
bigsur78 wrote:
>
> I'm very proud of the system (and sound) that I've been able to achieve
> on a pretty tight budget.
>
You should !
bigsur78 wrote:
>
> Thing is, I've now realized that there's always something better to
> strive for, isn't there.
>
The grass is always greener on the ot
Hey all
I'm new here... first post. I have a question but first a bit of
history. I'm a lifelong music lover but have never managed to invest
much time or money into a great stereo... spent too much time travelling
around spending my money on other things I guess. Nowadays I have a
young family so
10 matches
Mail list logo
