I live in Norway where we have plenty of cheap hydroelectricity. Plus,
it's cold, so we need heating 9 months a year anyway.
Thus I run an old noisy PC as a server, 24/7. It's in my kitchen, and
makes more noise than the fridge. But the kitchen has a door, and the
door can be closed, so I'm good.
epoch1970;540153 Wrote:
> A low power computer is interesting because it can run all the time and
> control the "ecosystem" with less watts.
It's also interesting because "low power" -> "no fan" -> "quiet".
--
Mark Miksis
---
epoch1970;540153 Wrote:
> A low power computer is interesting because it can run all the time and
> control the "ecosystem" with less watts.
It's also interesting because "low power" -> "no fan" -> "quiet".
--
Mark Miksis
---
A low power computer is interesting because it can run all the time and
control the "ecosystem" with less watts.
My SBs cut my amps when they are off. But they can't do much (even
that!) without the server running.
Personally: 1. I don't mind spending electricity as long as it is not
wasted, and
Well, longer battery life, lower thermal signature and other feauteres
desirable in small portable devices, could might as well be the main
motivation for spending resources on Atom processors.
--
bhaagensen
bhaagensen's P
No one mentions low-consumption amplifiers. How much money could they
save?
Hey, 5.1 and 7.x receivers HAVE to take more power than plain Stereo
right?
Shouldn't tube amps only be legal in states where they qualify as
heaters?
When these issues are under control we could start to address why
ev
