jemhayward wrote:
> I have now got my Wandboard and have installed CommunitySqueeze and once
> I'd deleted the ALSA parameters, it plays though my Audiolab MDAC via a
> hub, and sounds great, BUT although it will play 24/96 files, it seems
> to be coming out as 24bit 44.1kHz.
>
> I'm not sure wh
I have now got my Wandboard and have installed CommunitySqueeze and once
I'd deleted the ALSA parameters, it plays though my Audiolab MDAC via a
hub, and sounds great, BUT although it will play 24/96 files, it seems
to be coming out as 24bit 44.1kHz.
I'm not sure where I set the max sample rate.
Hi , l'm in no hurry really , l was considering the olive but l reckon
this'll be more what l'm after :)
kesa32's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59780
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.co
kesa32 wrote:
> Hi ,l'll be interested in Gen2 when it is released ( i could go Gen1 now
> , but my USB Dac is'nt as good as John's , so i'll wait for the final
> product l reckon )
Gen1 doesn't exist yet either ;-D See the FAQ for details, but John is
working on a board called SWAMP05 at the mo
Hi ,l'll be interested in Gen2 when it is released ( i could go Gen1 now
, but my USB Dac is'nt as good as John's , so i'll wait for the final
product l reckon )
kesa32's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?us
albertone74 wrote:
> Hi Triode,
>
> I have got a FLIRC device today. As I would like to use the SBT IR
> remote control, can you please let me know how I can use this file
>
> CommunitySqueeze Flirc Configuration.zip
>
> that you are referring to, in post #4?
>
> Many thanks.
Triode,
It is
Hi Triode,
I have got a FLIRC device today. As I would like to use the SBT IR
remote control, can you please let me know how I can use this file
CommunitySqueeze Flirc Configuration.zip
that you are referring to, in post #4?
Many thanks.
--
HumanMedia wrote:
> I have a dream that LMS supports Dop (DSD in a PCM wrapper) and that
> Community Squeeze supported it also for USB output. Then I would only
> need one audio player, no laptops, no Mac minis, no cd or sacd players
> and no more SBT.
Code is done. It's been done for some time,
I have a dream that LMS supported Dop (DSD in a PCM wrapper) and that
Community Squeeze supported it also for USB. Then I would only need one
audio player, no laptops, no Mac minis, no cd or sacd players and no
more SBT.
How I wish it were more than a dream.
JohnSwenson wrote:
> The wandboard consists of two pieces, a cpu module and a carrier board
> that has the peripheral interfaces. The module uses an emerging standard
> (the EDM standard) which several companies are supporting. We are
> currently using the wandboard in its entirety because it is
JackOfAll wrote:
> The short answer is no. Providing a release of CSOS that would run on
> the Touch is not something we intend to do. Which is not to say that at
> some point in the future there couldn't be a community released firmware
> (OS) for the Touch, but I see that as being unlikely, unl
JackOfAll wrote:
> Correct!
>
>
>
> Right now, before the John Swenson DAC board is released which will have
> an electrical SPDIF output, the default Wandboard carrier board has a
> TOSLINK out, but does not have a COAX SPDIF out.
>
>
>
> The current audio (software) driver limits the out
The musical fidelity vlink2 will work nicely with most modern linux
distros (so should be fine on the Fedora used in Community Squeeaze) as
an asynch USB to SPDIF adapter.
You can use the M2tech Hiface but you need to build the driver for it -
https://github.com/panicking/snd-usb-asyncaudio/wiki
marflao wrote:
>
> as far as I understood it the wandboard could be used as an altenative
> or substitute streaming device for a SB device (pls correct me if I´m
> wrong).
Correct!
marflao wrote:
>
> So let´s assume my beloved Touch will go to the happy hunting ground
> would I then be able
Corelli45 wrote:
> I I'm sorry if this is a silly question but I'm trying to weigh up the
> options here. Will the Community Squeeze OS ever be able to run on a
> Squeezebox Touch?
The short answer is no. Providing a release of CSOS that would run on
the Touch is not something we intend to do. W
Hi everybody,
as far as I understood it the wandboard could be used as an altenative
or substitute streaming device for a SB device.
So let´s assume my beloved Touch will go to the happy hunting ground
would I then be able to play my music - which is stored on a Syno NAS -
via the wandboard (whi
I I'm sorry if this is a silly question but I'm trying to weigh up the
options here. Will the Community Squeeze OS ever be able to run on a
Squeezebox Touch?
Corelli45's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?use
JackOfAll wrote:
>
> ickstream from what info has been given, is a cloud based music delivery
> platform. Their client API is not based on how an LMS client currently
> talks to the LMS server. Possibly the Touch could have a applet that
> connected directly back to the ickstream cloud for music
Triode wrote:
> To add to this - we specifically picked the Wandboard for two reasons
> (and you can see some agonising on this on the thread re hardware):
> 1) We know it supports USB Dacs well as it has hardware ehci based
> scheduling. Other platforms such as Beaglebone and Pi have serious
>
JackOfAll wrote:
> And you are more than welcome to use another solution. I have a drawer
> full of ARM hardware, that I have fiddled with for a week, then
> discarded for various reasons. I haven't found an achilles heel with the
> Wandboard yet, even if it is overkill for for a simple client pl
The wandboard consists of two pieces, a cpu module and a carrier board
that has the peripheral interfaces. The module uses an emerging standard
(the EDM standard) which several companies are supporting. We are
currently using the wandboard in its entirety because it is functional
as is. What I am
JackOfAll wrote:
> The thing is this.. It's a community project, by the community, for
> the community. It is going to depend on more people from the community
> getting involved. The people that are involved so far on the development
> side, can only do so much.
Totally understood. I may be
Mark Miksis wrote:
> The Wandboard seems like overkill for those of us not wanting to run LMS
> on the player. There will probably be less expensive player-only
> solutions, especially if the Raspberry Pi ever gets their USB drivers
> fixed.
And you are more than welcome to use another solution
TheShanMan wrote:
> I hope that this effort will ultimately include a future for
> squeezeserver running on windows, support for older clients
The thing is this.. It's a community project, by the community, for
the community. It is going to depend on more people from the community
gettin
Thank you John, that clears it up for me.
Interesting developments on multiple fronts here.
maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9080
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread
JackOfAll wrote:
> The Wandboard Dual is the preferred hardware platform. This will not
> change. The JS DAC carrier board has been designed to work with the
> Wandboard and its EDM connector. If you wish to use the JS designed DAC
> carrier board when it becomes available, it will only work with
maggior wrote:
>
> Perhaps I missed in in the 79 pages of posts, but are there plans for
> how this hardware will be disceminated? I see where John was soldering
> components to a PCB. Has somebody signed up to mass produce the
> hardware?
Another announcement will be made, specifically conce
froth wrote:
> So is this different to what the ick squeeze post that pippen posted?
> Or is it complementary? Or is it compitision?
>
> It all confusing to me.
Yes, it is confusing. Community Squeeze is about supporting LMS, the
Squeezelite software player, and a Community Based hardware pla
I'm interested to see where this goes. I'm probably not interested in a
stand alone server though. I hope that this effort will ultimately
include a future for squeezeserver running on windows, support for older
clients (I have a slimp3 and an SB1), and support for Pandora that
doesn't time out (t
Furry wrote:
> As a potential 'early user', I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1. Is it likely that the Wandboard will persist, as the preferred
> hardware platform?
>
> 2. If it doesn't persist, then is it likely that the Wandboard will
> (also) be supported for future software releases?
The W
Furry wrote:
> As a potential 'early user', I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1. Is it likely that the Wandboard will persist, as the preferred
> hardware platform?
>
> 2. If it doesn't persist, then is it likely that the Wandboard will
> (also) be supported for future software releases?
My un
As a potential 'early user', I have a couple of questions:
1. Is it likely that the Wandboard will persist, as the preferred
hardware platform?
2. If it doesn't persist, then is it likely that the Wandboard will
(also) be supported for future software releases?
Marsupial wrote:
> Can the community squeeze OS run on other hardware?
yes
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98521
___
Can the community squeeze OS run on other hardware?
Marsupial's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59182
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98521
froth wrote:
> So is this different to what the ick squeeze post that pippen posted?
> Or is it complementary? Or is it compitision?
>
> It all confusing to me.
My understanding: community squeeze is an "operating system" that can
be installed on hardware to emulate a squeezebox player. The
So is this different to what the ick squeeze post that pippen posted?
Or is it complementary? Or is it compitision?
It all confusing to me.
froth's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11878
View this
maggior wrote:
> I read through some of that thread and the wiki article was
> interesting.
>
> Perhaps I missed in in the 79 pages of posts, but are there plans for
> how this hardware will be disceminated? I see where John was soldering
> copmonents to a PCB. Has somebody signed up to mass p
I read through some of that thread and the wiki article was
interesting.
Perhaps I missed in in the 79 pages of posts, but are there plans for
this hardware will be disceminated?
maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevice
Maggior:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?97881-Community-Funded-Squeezebox-Replacement-Would-you-be-interested
asplundj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=53571
View this thread: http://
maggior wrote:
> What form will the "community hardware" take? Community software
> projects make sense, but I've never heard of a community hardware
> project. Will it be a parts list? A kit?
'Wikipedia: Open Source Hardware'
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_hardware)
What form will the "community hardware" take? Community software
projects make sense, but I've never heard of a community hardware
project. Will it be a parts list? A kit?
It's interesting to see this little projects taking root. Hopefully one
or all of them will take off.
-
Consider putting instructions and perhaps a wiki on the
communitysqueeze.org website. As this thread becomes numerous pages,
and new threads get formed, having a central point of important
information very useful.
It's too bad the squeezebox wiki is no longer maintained.
Paul
---
According to the Wanboard site there are two versions of the hardware
available. A Solo and a Dual version. The Dual version also has wifi.
Which of these two boards are required for this project?
Pascal Hibon's Profile: ht
jmschnur wrote:
> Will IPeng work with is?
>
>
> J
Yes - It's LMS based and will support existing LMS on an external server
(as today's squeezeboxes) or on the Wandboard. In both cases all
existing LMS control applications will work, including the web interface
and iPeng, SqueezePlay, Squeeze
Will IPeng work with is?
J
jmschnur's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8604
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98521
___
d
Community Squeeze OS is designed to work with commerically available
hardware. In advance of the Community Squeeze hardware player, this is
the Wandboard (http://www.wandboard.org/) which is available via a
number of resellers linked from their web page.
If you want to use this as a Squeezebox c
I'll post this here too, already posted in the other thread.
Just put R1 on my Wandboard. Web interface for WLAN-configuration didn't
seem to do what it needed to do (yes, I did use the "Save and
reboot"-button) but I used Putty to ssh in and checked if the settings
were correctly applied. ESSID
Community Squeeze OS for the Wandboard can be downloaded from here:
Code:
http://www.communitysqueeze.org/images/wandboard/CSOS/CSOS-Wandboard-Dual-R1-20130409-1.img.7z
Technical discussion of Community Squeeze OS and the features of this
r
Community Squeeze Release
Community Squeeze is a community driven activity to continue the
squeezebox open ecosystem and maintain availability of squeezebox
compatible players now that Slimdevices/Logitech are no longer active in
this market. It targets great audio quality at low cost with full
49 matches
Mail list logo
