haunyack;268323 Wrote:
Huh?
Since when?
.
He's refering to the thread that started this discussion why
squeezebox sucks, AFAIK it's not a comment aimed at you.
--
mattybain
'[image:
http://imagegen.last.fm/recenttracks3/recenttracks/MattyBain.gif]'
Peter;268318 Wrote:
My TV has more buttons than the SB and
nobody ever complained about that.
You're kidding, right?
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040607.html
--
Joe Luser
Joe Luser's Profile:
Joe Luser wrote:
Peter;268318 Wrote:
My TV has more buttons than the SB and
nobody ever complained about that.
You're kidding, right?
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040607.html
This guy is mostly complaining about having to use multiple remotes and
how hard it is to
I would like to rig it up to a coin machine, so people have to pay like
with a proper bar jukebox. Just add the tracks(s) to the end of an
unchangeable playlist, then make them wait ages to get to their track
just like in a real pub (i'm sure mine should be on by now!) :)
--
autopilot
mattybain;268340 Wrote:
He's refering to the thread that started this discussion why squeezebox
sucks, AFAIK it's not a comment aimed at you.
Hi mattybain,
Yes, I've been following this thread.
Thought I might inject a little humor, considering the fiasco I went
through a while back.
It
ceejay;268391 Wrote:
Quite right.
For the IR remote case, what would we miss if we just used the NoSetup
plugin and an adapted keymap?
Ceejay
I would like to see the following in Party Mode
-configurable option Don't allow track / Artist to be added if it
appears in the last XX entries
Khuli;268385 Wrote:
Can we be a radical here and get back to the thread topic?
The OP wanted to discuss a potential party mode with a view to the
solution for the original 'sucking' thread, not a continued argument
about the current usability
Quite right.
My contribution in the other
Can we be a radical here and get back to the thread topic?
The OP wanted to discuss a potential party mode with a view to the
solution for the original 'sucking' thread, not a continued argument
about the current usability
--
Khuli
http://www.last.fm/user/khuli
Khuli;268067 Wrote:
1. Pressing 'Play' on a track inserts it at the current point in the
playlist and plays it immediately, before continuing on with the
existing playlist.
I thought the pressing play stops the current track was the main
gripe in the Sucks thread.
Agree with your other
I would suggest:
1. Pressing 'Play' on a track, inserts it at the current point in the
playlist and plays it immediately, before continuing on with the
existing playlist.
2. Pressing 'Add' adds a track to the end of the list as normal.
3. The saved playlist cannot be deleted. The playlist in
Following on from the Why Squeezebox sucks thread I'm starting this as
a proper discussion of how a Party Mode should work.
I've regularly had the same problem as the original poster whereby
playlists regularly get wiped by mistake so i'd like to see a 'safe
mode' for the remote and a 'simple'
With all due respect, radish, your note reads like the classic engineer
response
to poor UI design. Yes, people *can* figure this stuff out. The problem
is you
lose 90% of your potential audience from the get-go if you insist on
*forcing* them
to figure it out. Remember the Rio? The uber-cool,
Joe Luser wrote:
With all due respect, radish, your note reads like the classic engineer
response
to poor UI design. Yes, people *can* figure this stuff out. The problem
is you
lose 90% of your potential audience from the get-go if you insist on
*forcing* them
to figure it out. Remember the
Peter;268318 Wrote:
Trying it for the first time during a
party while inebriated is not the best way to learn.
Peter
Huh?
Since when?
.
--
haunyack
Transporter - BK 200.2 - Vandersteen 3A Signature
C.G. Conn New York Wonder - circa 1898.
Or simply save the about-to-be-cleared playlist as, well, a playlist.
Keep some limited number of playlists (pros and cons for either naming
with date/time or just 01, 02, etc).
For now, if you oops, it's a matter of loading that playlist - but it
could become the basis of undo/redo
Joe Luser;268258 Wrote:
The sb2 remote has TWENTY-NINE buttons! No matter where this discussion
goes, it's impossible to fix the interface by repairing the
functionality of
one single button. The duet gets a little better with eleven (note the
iPod,
depending on how you count, has two). As
The sb2 remote has TWENTY-NINE buttons! No matter where this discussion
goes, it's impossible to fix the interface by repairing the
functionality of
one single button. The duet gets a little better with eleven (note the
iPod,
depending on how you count, has two). As long as the interface is
bobkoure wrote:
Or simply save the about-to-be-cleared playlist as, well, a playlist.
Keep some limited number of playlists (pros and cons for either naming
with date/time or just 01, 02, etc).
For now, if you oops, it's a matter of loading that playlist - but it
could become the basis of
I like Khuli's Ideas. Pressing play could also add it as the next track
in the playlist. If you wanted to hear it at once you could press play
on the trace and then press the next track key ..
--
Sike
Sike's Profile:
mflint;268072 Wrote:
I thought the pressing play stops the current track was the main gripe
in the Sucks thread.
I think the big gripe was Pressing play OVERWRITES the current
playlist...
--
Khuli
http://www.last.fm/user/khuli
20 matches
Mail list logo
