I don't know about the whole profiles thing, maybe that's overkill.
But I would like a way of segmenting the music library.
Particularly I would like a way of limiting the choice that the random
plugin could make, but I guess that's one for the 3rd party forum.
Cheers,
Bruce.
--
Bruce
kdf Wrote:
were you asking for ideas, or merely giving orders? if it's the latter,
you can take a number...
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825
-kdf
He ordered me first!
--
Randall
___
Discuss mailing list
On Aug 11, 2005, at 7:34 AM, Randall wrote:
kdf Wrote:
were you asking for ideas, or merely giving orders? if it's the
latter,
you can take a number...
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825
-kdf
He ordered me first!
Now, boys, I don't care who started it. Don't make me pull
Randall wrote:
kdf Wrote:
were you asking for ideas, or merely giving orders? if it's the latter,
you can take a number...
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825
-kdf
He ordered me first!
I did not see the issue until you explained the user/squeezebox control
User profiles strike me as a feature that must happen at some point in
time.
But the idea of multiple libraries is something that wouldn't have to
depend on user profiles. It might be a browse level above Browse
Music.
The question I'd have is how do you designate what is contained within
a
JJZolx wrote:
But the idea of multiple libraries is something that wouldn't have to
depend on user profiles. It might be a browse level above Browse
Music.
true, it doesn't have to depend on user profile, but it helps. some of
the user issues that were driving the requests for multiple
The server does already make use of the HOME environment for users in some OSes.
If the server were tweaked a bit to allow it to easily run as multiple
servers, the user profile slimply becomes a matter of running the server under
a different user, with associated prefs, library, db, etc. You
kdf wrote:
The server does already make use of the HOME environment for users in some OSes.
If the server were tweaked a bit to allow it to easily run as multiple
servers, the user profile slimply becomes a matter of running the server under
a different user, with associated prefs, library, db,
fuzzyT Wrote:
i'm thinking of multiple libraries all being in the same database, just
with tracks having a reference to the library that they belong to.
Trying to refactor the existing server to run multiple libraries
concurrently
would probably end up being very similar to running
Quoting ron thigpen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
also, wouldn't this increase overhead for system resources to load
multiple instances of all the server bits?
well, I think I'm just getting the impression that demands for how this must
work will end up causing the one instance to double up on so much
well, I think I'm just getting the impression that demands for how
this
must
work will end up causing the one instance to double up on so much
already.
Its
a given that once such a feature is created, there will be a user out
there who
will demand that it works in every different way
Michael Amster Wrote:
Randall wrote:
Howdy dev team. Question. I'd like to see the squeezebox allow
different profiles. Why not? For example. Say I personally have
50%
decent songs while the other 50% are songs that have explicit lyrics
in
which I really wouldn't want others to
On 10-Aug-05, at 8:49 PM, Randall wrote:
Michael Amster Wrote:
Randall wrote:
Howdy dev team. Question. I'd like to see the squeezebox allow
different profiles. Why not? For example. Say I personally have
50%
decent songs while the other 50% are songs that have explicit lyrics
in
13 matches
Mail list logo
