shvejk Wrote:
> Burn yourself a copy of SlimCD, boot your PC, mount the hard drive and
> give it a try.
I tried this before Michael, when you first announced the CD, but the
thing would not work... I'm sorry I can't remember just what it was
that happened (or didn't happen). [Late edit: may have
Burn yourself a copy of SlimCD, boot your PC, mount the hard drive and give it a try.
You can easily find out if your Windows setup is at fault.
http://www.herger.net/slim/detail.php?nr=763&kategorie=slim
I used to have annoying issues with my Windows setup.
SlimCD works great for me and it is
abdomen Wrote:
> it might be a useful troubleshooting experiment to stop all services and
> other processes by clicking End Process on everything but slim.exe in
> the Processes tab of Windows Task Manager.
Unfortunately, if you do this you end up with no network to broadcast
across (those pesky
In addition to capturing performance metrics, it might be a useful
troubleshooting experiment to stop all services and other processes by
clicking End Process on everything but slim.exe in the Processes tab of
Windows Task Manager. For good measure, I would also restart slim.exe
after doing this.
radish wrote:
stinkingpig Wrote:
ceejay wrote:
...So the answer isn't simply "slimerver performance sucks", but
clearly
some people are having problems. Do we have a performance expert in
the audience who can help identify some pointers or diagnostics?
Ceejay
stinkingpig Wrote:
> ceejay wrote:
>
> >...So the answer isn't simply "slimerver performance sucks", but
> clearly
> >some people are having problems. Do we have a performance expert in
> >the audience who can help identify some pointers or diagnostics?
> >
> >Ceejay
> >
> >
> >
>
> Performa
ceejay wrote:
...So the answer isn't simply "slimerver performance sucks", but clearly
some people are having problems. Do we have a performance expert in
the audience who can help identify some pointers or diagnostics?
Ceejay
Performance profiling is tougher on Windows because it genera
There have been a few messages of this type before, so its fair to say
this is not just a single rogue PC configuration problem. On the other
hand, there are lots of people for whom slimserver is working fine.
I have a smaller library - 5000 tracks, 500 albums, but running on an
underpowered 600M
Can the skin affect performance?
--
Music Machine
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
radish wrote:
ModelCitizen Wrote:
This is very similar to my experience of SlimServer. As my library has
grown the performance has decreased, this with a SB1 and a SB2 (library
currently consists of 800 flac albums). I was hoping that the addition
of the database with version 6 might sort ou
ModelCitizen Wrote:
> This is very similar to my experience of SlimServer. As my library has
> grown the performance has decreased, this with a SB1 and a SB2 (library
> currently consists of 800 flac albums). I was hoping that the addition
> of the database with version 6 might sort out my perfor
Eric H Wrote:
> I can be browsing music on the Squeezebox by Genre, if I ask it to
> display all the ALBUMS, well the Squeezebox will just freeze up. No
> responsiveness at all. After about 20-30 seconds, the Squeezebox will
> say it can't communicate or locate the SlimServer. If you just sit and
12 matches
Mail list logo
