D'oh - I figured out what my problem was. When I configured my hardware
firewall/router to port forward packets over to the sshd/slimserver
linux box I only forwarded tcp packets - evidently SoftSqueeze needs
for both TCP and UDP to be allowed through.
Thanks to everyone for your suggestions.
Ke
kkitts Wrote:
> I set up a session in putty and configured it to open 2 tunnels based on
> the ports that you have below. I can then activate this session in putty
> - I get a login prompt - and I can login using ssh to the
> slimserver/linux box. I assume that should authenticate me so that
> ot
Just figured out that my ssh tunnel works fine when both the client and
server are inside the firewall at home. I guess the linksys
firewall/router is doing something funny. Even though I can ssh to the
slimserver/linux box from outside the firewall - for some reason then I
come through the firewa
kkits,
The large amount of sudden network activity you see is indicating to me
that slimserver is rejecting your connections. SoftSqueeze hits the
slimproto pretty hard, so you'll see hundreds of packets trying to make
the connection.
Make sure on the Slim web under Server Settings->Security in
wei wrote:
You are exactly right!
My music files are all stored in WAV format, 16-bit PCM 44.1KHz. So it
would consume a little bit less 1.5Mbps bandwidth. I did not know that
when streaming through iTune, slimserver does MP3 real-time encoding
with 320K as the defalut bitrate, which explains
kkits,
Make sure on the Slim web under Server Settings->Security in the
Allowed IP Addresses section you have added and saved your work's IP
address from which you will be connecting.
--
MrC
MrC's Profile: http://forums.s
You are exactly right!
My music files are all stored in WAV format, 16-bit PCM 44.1KHz. So it
would consume a little bit less 1.5Mbps bandwidth. I did not know that
when streaming through iTune, slimserver does MP3 real-time encoding
with 320K as the defalut bitrate, which explains why iTune pl
I've tried both localhost and 127.0.0.1 in the SoftSqueeze prefs.
gorstk Wrote:
> wei wrote:
> > It so happens I am setting up SoftSqueeze today as well. I am
> running
> > openSSH and SlimServer 6.2.1 on Ubuntu Linux 5.10 (compiled from
> > source) at home, where the uplink is about 700Kbps.
>
wei wrote:
It so happens I am setting up SoftSqueeze today as well. I am running
openSSH and SlimServer 6.2.1 on Ubuntu Linux 5.10 (compiled from
source) at home, where the uplink is about 700Kbps.
Then I set up a ssh tunnel using SSH Secure Shell to the slimserver on
the PC at work, and open t
It so happens I am setting up SoftSqueeze today as well. I am running
openSSH and SlimServer 6.2.1 on Ubuntu Linux 5.10 (compiled from
source) at home, where the uplink is about 700Kbps.
Then I set up a ssh tunnel using SSH Secure Shell to the slimserver on
the PC at work, and open the stream ht
Have you changed softsqueeze to connect to localhost?
--
MrC
MrC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=468
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=18716
__
I set up a session in putty and configured it to open 2 tunnels based on
the ports that you have below. I can then activate this session in putty
- I get a login prompt - and I can login using ssh to the
slimserver/linux box. I assume that should authenticate me so that
other processes like SoftSq
Are you using public/private keys or just username/password?
Some people have reported problems with softsqueeze, however it worked
for me when I tried the SSH-from-work setup recently. I was using keys
for authentication.
You could always try setting up an SSH tunnel using PuTTY and
configuring
13 matches
Mail list logo
