Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-19 Thread JJZolx
I find the new changed scanning to be quite fast. On my old P4 Windows server a full scan of 21,000 Flac files takes about 26 minutes. A new changed scan takes only 2:20. Your idea has been suggested before and even accepted by many people as a good idea. Something like: you browse through

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-19 Thread Zevs
JJZolx;321170 Wrote: I find the new changed scanning to be quite fast. On my old P4 Windows server a full scan of 21,000 Flac files takes about 26 minutes. A new changed scan takes only 2:20. Your idea has been suggested before and even accepted by many people as a good idea.

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-19 Thread JJZolx
Zevs;321172 Wrote: What do you mean with the new changed scanning ? I'm using SqueezeCenter 7.1 and have ~54 000 tracks on an external harddrive. A regular scanning update of this takes up to 2 hours (depending on what else I'm doing on the computer, Windows Vista), and this I have to wait

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-19 Thread Zevs
JJZolx;321179 Wrote: There are two scanning options (plus the playlist only scan): - Look for new and changed music - Clear library and rescan everything The first is the new changed scan. The second one starts all over from scratch and takes a lot longer. Yes and the first

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-19 Thread Zevs
JJZolx;321179 Wrote: It may be the external drive that's killing you. Is it either USB or Firewire 400? If so, internal drives would probably make scanning a lot faster. Another option, though, is an external drive with an eSATA interface, which can be just as fast as an internal. ..by

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-19 Thread JJZolx
Zevs;321182 Wrote: ..by the way Jim do you use MusicIP integration with SC ? When looking at the times reported for the scanning, it seems it is clearly the MusicIP database that takes 95 % of the scanning time. No, I don't. It looks like the discussion in this bug report may be relevant:

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-19 Thread Zevs
JJZolx;321187 Wrote: No, I don't. It looks like the discussion in this bug report may be relevant: http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5637 Thanks Jim! Yes that seems to be something similar for sure. Zevs -- Zevs

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-18 Thread Michael Herger
Hi, I was looking for the same thing. Isn't this the same as Browse Music Folder to the new album? It's then added to the library. Michael ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-18 Thread Zevs
mherger;320819 Wrote: Hi, I was looking for the same thing. Isn't this the same as Browse Music Folder to the new album? It's then added to the library. Michael Hi Michael! But do you really get the tags and the covers and the MusicIP info embedded in the files read by doing that?

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-18 Thread Michael Herger
But do you really get the tags and the covers and the MusicIP info embedded in the files read by doing that? I thought not, but perhaps I'm wrong ? I'm sorry, no. Just the tags. MIP should be updated in regular intervals (as defined in SC's MIP settings). -- Michael

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-18 Thread jeffmeh
Zevs;320892 Wrote: Hi Michael! But do you really get the tags and the covers and the MusicIP info embedded in the files read by doing that? I thought not, but perhaps I'm wrong ? Zevs Yes, you do. -- jeffmeh

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-18 Thread Zevs
mherger;320906 Wrote: But do you really get the tags and the covers and the MusicIP info embedded in the files read by doing that? I thought not, but perhaps I'm wrong ? I'm sorry, no. Just the tags. MIP should be updated in regular intervals (as defined in SC's MIP settings). --

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-18 Thread Zevs
Zevs;320969 Wrote: Thanks Michael for the response, so you won't get the mixer info even if you in MIP has set it to always write the music fingerprint directly into the tags ? Zevs ...and if you won't I guess I'm back to my original question and proposal, i.e. that it would be great to

[slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-17 Thread Zevs
Hi! Why isn't it possible as an aoption to specify a directory to scan when one one wants to update ones's music database. As it is now we have the options of deleting all and rescan all or look for new or changed music in the full database. Both these options take loads of time if you have a

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-17 Thread ewreck
Brilliant Idea. -- ewreck ewreck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18665 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49948 ___

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-17 Thread rmckay
Hi, I was looking for the same thing. I have the same problem with a huge library that takes forever to rescan just to add one new album. I'm running the server on a linux box and noticed another file in the same directory as the server: /usr/libexec/squeezecenter-scanner After a quick look at

Re: [slim] Scanning doe new or updated music--

2008-07-17 Thread Zevs
rmckay;320759 Wrote: Hi, I was looking for the same thing. I have the same problem with a huge library that takes forever to rescan just to add one new album. I'm running the server on a linux box and noticed another file in the same directory as the server: