[slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-08 Thread rrgmrg
My Transporter does after 6 years. I missed it so much I shelled out 750 for a NIB black with knob on EBay. When this one goes I suspect they won't be any more around. Forgive me if this has already been discussed, but why did Logitech give up on it or at the very least, why wasn't it picked up by

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-08 Thread JJZolx
To be honest, the Transporter was an inside joke by Sean Adams, who chuckled under his breath at audiophiles and the little rarefied world that they live in. He designed a very nice sounding device, and gave it an arbitrary price tag. ("Hey Tony, how does $1000 sound? That's expensive, right?" "Na

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-08 Thread SuperQ
That's a lot of faith in Logitech management. I bought a harmony remote on the premise that I could manually tweak config files, and it had a good, if windows-based UI for configuration. Then they made this completely shit wizard-based abomination that was nearly force-upgraded upon me. I still

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-08 Thread rrgmrg
JJZolx wrote: > To be honest, the Transporter was an inside joke by Sean Adams, I totally agree that it was way overpriced, but for an "inside joke" it's an awesome and innovative product, so much so that I overpaid a second time. Works great, sounds great and looks awesome in my rack. ---

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-09 Thread callesoroe
JJZolx wrote: > To be honest, the Transporter was an inside joke by Sean Adams, who > chuckled under his breath at audiophiles and the little rarefied world > that they live in. He designed a very nice sounding device, and gave it > an arbitrary price tag. ("Hey Tony, how does $1000 sound? That's

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-09 Thread cliveb
JJZolx wrote: > Unfortunately, they inherited (bought, actually) an ecosystem that was > extremely expensive to maintain, and way more rickety than they'd hoped. Funny that. I've never had any reliability problems with any version of SlimServer/SqueezeCenter/LMS. I've run various incarnations on

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-09 Thread netchord
i have two, one of which i use via its digital output to a Meridian G61. i could use a touch for the same purpose, but the transporter looks so much cooler. i paid $1300 for one, and $600 for the other, several years apart. the average seems about right, and it sounds fabulous via its analog out

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-11 Thread SamS
I have two now, bought a spare NIB via eBay for about $500. Cheap insurance for when one eventually gives up the ghost. SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.sl

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-11 Thread Greg Erskine
rrgmrg wrote: > My Transporter died after 6 years. I missed it so much I shelled out 750 > for a NIB black with knob on EBay. When this one goes I suspect there > won't be any more around. Forgive me if this has already been discussed, > but why did Logitech give up on it or at the very least, wh

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-13 Thread rrgmrg
Greg Erskine wrote: > Hi Randy, > > There is a thread here discussing replacing failed Transporter PSUs. > > Maybe you can bring it back to life? > > regards > Greg Thank you Greg. I'm afraid I already sent it to E Waste. Probably should have kept it for parts and pursued a repair, it would h

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-15 Thread riffer
rrgmrg wrote: > Thank you Greg. I'm afraid I already sent it to E Waste. Probably should > have kept it for parts and pursued a repair, it would have been nice to > have a backup. > > Randy Ouch!! People would have bought it just for a working display and the knob.

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-19 Thread BJW
JJZolx wrote: > If they could have sold a device for $99, then Squeezebox might still be > alive. Unfortunately, they inherited (bought, actually) an ecosystem > that was extremely expensive to maintain, and way more rickety than > they'd hoped. > > If Logitech had immediately made the decision

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-19 Thread cliveb
BJW wrote: > totally agree! i believe had the first SB used a native audio driver > for windows, that would have been huge. Comments like this just go to show how badly some people misunderstand the Squeezebox ecosystem. None of the Squeezebox players were ever Windows devices, and the server s

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-19 Thread Mnyb
cliveb wrote: > Comments like this just go to show how badly some people misunderstand > the Squeezebox ecosystem. > > None of the Squeezebox players were ever Windows devices, and the server > software isn't an audio application - it sends packets of data via > TCP/IP to the players. You can ru

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-22 Thread BJW
cliveb wrote: > Comments like this just go to show how badly some people misunderstand > the Squeezebox ecosystem. > > None of the Squeezebox players were ever Windows devices, and the server > software isn't an audio application - it sends packets of data via > TCP/IP to the players. You can ru

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-23 Thread toby10
BJW wrote: > . i could have used winamp to play all my stuff the way i ALREADY > was using winamp. and i can remote control my winamp too, i don't need > server for that. . WinAmp is a server. toby10's Profile: http

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2015-10-23 Thread epoch1970
BJW wrote: > what must be acknowledged, is what was done, was not the right thing to > do. Right. But that's as far as I am with you. How do you explain Sonos is still in the market? They do market expensive stuff, and their design is a networked audio system, not a long audio cable for windows d

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2017-03-13 Thread Golden Earring
Hi guys! Just a quick pointer to my recent thread in the Audiophile sub-forum under the above heading (it's near the top of page 1), in case you don't graze there often. If anyone still wants one, or even a spare for insurance, they're not over-priced now... Best regards, Dave :) ---

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2017-03-17 Thread pablolie
The problem was they only saw value in hardware (selling Transporters or Touches or Booms), but never realized the software ecosystem was actually the more valuable asset. I have often said I would have paid $ for an LMS and especially a "Squeeze Slave" agent license. Why that stuff was always giv

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2018-04-22 Thread garym
Hammer865 wrote: > Fellow Transporters, > > I started with the SB after reading a review by David Pogue in the NYT > "personal tech" column, around 2004. > > Then sprung the $2000 for the Transporter in 2006 and sold the SB. It > sits in my rack with an ADCOM GTP-602 preamp (which I selected fo

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2018-08-25 Thread Hammer865
GaryM, Thanks for your reply and I checked that setting and it is pointed at my Itunes library. I still struggle with having only my Squeezebox account verified so I can stream radio, etc, but I when I select "Connect to LMS" to connect to my PC to be able to stream my ITunes but I get these erro

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2018-08-25 Thread Hammer865
Transporter Type: Transporter Status: Not Connected so how do I get it to connect? Hammer865's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4386 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.ph

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2018-08-25 Thread garym
Hammer865 wrote: > Transporter > > Type: Transporter > > Status: Not Connected > > > so how do I get it to connect? on Transporter menu (unit itself), select "My Music" then it will try to connect to your local LMS. If you have more than one LMS running locally, choose the name you've give

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2018-08-26 Thread RonM
Jeez, Gary, more than 11,000 posts? You are indeed a warrior! R. LMS on a dedicated server (FitPC3) Transporter (Ethernet) - main listening, Onkyo receiver, Paradigm speakers Touch (WiFi) - home theater 5.1, Sony receiver, Energy speakers Boom 1 (WiFi) - work-space Boom 2 (WiFi) - various (de

Re: [slim] The Demise of the Transporter

2018-08-27 Thread garym
RonM wrote: > Jeez, Gary, more than 11,000 posts? You are indeed a warrior! > > R. oh myI spend way too much time in front of a computer. *Home:* VBA 4TB (2.4)>LMS 7.9.1>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio (ethernet) *Cottage:* VBA 3TB (2.4)>LMS 7.9.1>Touch> Benchmark DAC I, Boom, Radio w/B