Re: [slim] Re: Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-12-23 Thread kdf
On 23-Dec-05, at 5:24 AM, don_quay wrote: I've just raised a bug sheet for this issue. Please vote for this... Ethernet to wireless router, then wireless to SB2. XP settings on the network card set to allow PC to be woken by WOL packet, and Admin Only checkbox also checked. Is this not just

Re: [slim] Re: Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-12-23 Thread Daniel Cohen
On 23/12/05 at 10:45 -0800, kdf wrote On 23-Dec-05, at 5:24 AM, don_quay wrote: I've just raised a bug sheet for this issue. Please vote for this... Ethernet to wireless router, then wireless to SB2. XP settings on the network card set to allow PC to be woken by WOL packet, and Admin Only

RE: [slim] Re: Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-10 Thread Craig, James (IT)
I believe the WMA stream still goes via SlimServer, even if the SB2 is decoding it? Or are you talking about using Squeezenetwork? James NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not waive

Re: [slim] Re: Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-09 Thread kdf
On 9-Nov-05, at 12:50 AM, getprogs wrote: This is *not* related to any Windows XP bug etc., but simply a result of missing traffic from the SB2 to the server - I believe that a Linux box will also exhibit the same behaviour to preserve power. you may believe, but real life says differently

Re: [slim] Re: Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-08 Thread kdf
Quoting getprogs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Since the new firmware does the WMA ecoding on the SB, my slimserver is going into powersave since not enough activity is generated from the SB to the server (i.e. the server thinks the SB is powered off - SB2 to be exact ;-). This is particularly anoying

Re: [slim] Re: Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 19:44 -0800, Michaelwagner wrote: dean Wrote: Nearly every ethernet card I've encountered does support WOL. I have some old ones that don't. Also, WOL requires at least an AT-X power supply and power to the lan card, so some older machines won't be able to support it