Paul Webster;454958 Wrote:
> See the wiki
> http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/HardwareComparison
Looks like the Wiki needs an update to include Radio and Touch!
--
iPhone
*iPhone*
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's, VeraStarr
6.4SE 6-channel Amp, V
oooh SQueezebox touch in a car would be awesome!!
Not sure how the wife would react to me butchering our car trying to
install one though.
Might be a job for a professional installer.
--
mparry
Matt Parry-SMS Sales
[email]ord...@slimdevices.com
650-210-9400x2
-
Finding out that it runs SqueezeCenter direct from the device itself
makes me want to buy a new car so I can install it in it. Originally I
was planning on installing a carputer, but this is *much* easier!
Well done, Logitech!
--
JadeMonkee
2x squeezebox classics {1x via switch | 1x via wifi}
Paul Webster;454958 Wrote:
> See the wiki
> http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/HardwareComparison
Can anyone update the wiki with the Radio and Touch? I would be
interested to see some of the hardware specific stuff (so far I have
only seen the spec on the DAC in other threads)
CW
--
Chun
Muele;454861 Wrote:
> Before abandoning this thread entirely I will post a small coment to
> some of my own predictions.
>
> After all I was wrong for the most part, but I also was right in some
> little parts, as the Classic is being discontinued.
> And the fact that I was proven wrong in othe
Justme;454946 Wrote:
> Interesting, can someone post a picture of the SB1? I have an earlier
> squeezebox, but I'm not sure if it the SB1 or SB2.
See the wiki
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/HardwareComparison
--
Paul Webster
Paul Webster
http://www.lastfm.com/user/BondJamesBond
--
[image:
http://reviews.digitaltrends.com/images/firstlook/slimdevices/squeezebox1.gif]
AFAIK, SB1 and SB2 are looking the same, but the SB2's graphics
capabilities are enhanced over the SB1.
--
sebp
System : Mac Mini for ripping to FLAC (XLD) > SqueezeCenter 7.3 running
on a ReadyNAS NV+
Livin
funkstar;454353 Wrote:
> It does run Squeezecenter, although many features are disabled. There is
> no transcoding, no web interface and no support for the SliMP3 and SB1.
>
> But remember this *is* Squeezecenter, it isn't just showing you a list
> of files on a memory card like most car head un
autopilot;454883 Wrote:
> Oh yes, it (and others) was followed closely with much amusement and
> sometimes amazement at how close some people got, as well as how way of
> the mark others were :)
The number of times I was sitting here grinding my teeth because I knew
I couldn't comment on certain
Muele;454861 Wrote:
>
> What a laugh the developers and beta tester must have had reading this
> thread.
Oh yes, it (and others) was followed closely with much amusement and
sometimes amazement at how close some people got, as well as how way of
the mark others were :)
--
autopilot
Cheers,
Before abandoning this thread entirely I will post a small coment to
some of my own predictions.
Muele;434230 Wrote:
> Come on all you guys speculating in built-in-server capabilities,
> dock+remote etc. This is clearly "just" a Jazzed-up classic. It has some
> nice additions to what the classic
aubuti;454581 Wrote:
> Here's what they really thought of:
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67420
Yes, it is wonderfull. I must have misread the premature pics.
--
Muele
BR Mogens
2 Controllers, 2 Receivers, 1 Squeezeplay. Running off old 800 mhz IBM
T21 Thinkpad.
--
Muele;453599 Wrote:
> I would really like this device for the kitchen. But I would mount it on
> the wall and it looks like all the wires point out of the back, making
> wall mount imposible. It's a shame since they could probably pretty
> easily have pointed them downwards, had they thought of i
I started this thread 2,5 months before launch of the product, and I
agree it's time now to post further in the Touch forum. I believe it was
quite a succesfull thread ;-) and I enjoyed reading all the reactions.
Moderaters may close this thread now.
--
Bert0123
---
There is a new Touch forum now, i would suggest any new
discussion/questions are posted in there now :)
--
autopilot
Cheers, auto.
*lounge:* squeezebox 3, squeezebox controller, cambridge audio 640a,
mission 701's *kitchen:* squeezebox touch, trends ta-10.1, kef cresta
1's. *bedroom:* squeeze
autopilot;454356 Wrote:
> Already working for me :)
sounds good, and does it also serve out album art to the other boxes, i
assume only the radio at the moment, what s/w version you using?
has it been stable while testing?
--
trouty00
-
They might as well discontinue the Duet Controller and offer ipeng
application for different touch devices like iPod, iPhone, Windows CE,
Android etc. They offer far better and cheaper hardware.
Keep the reciever in the program for headless installations where you
want to hide it.
--
Letten
D
On a dutch retailer's site it says:
Expected release date: End of 2009
--
verypsb
2x Duet, 1x Boom, 1x Classic
verypsb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17295
View this thread: http://forums.slimd
Letten;454385 Wrote:
> They might as well discontinue the Duet Controller and offer ipeng
> application for different touch devices like iPod, iPhone, Windows CE,
> Android etc. They offer far better and cheaper hardware.
>
> Keep the reciever in the program for headless installations where you
frantic;454321 Wrote:
> http://www.logitechsqueezebox.com/product_matrix.html
>
> - frantic
If you read this Matrix, you should choose the Radio, Boom or Touch if
"You already own a Squeezebox Duet and want to add more zones."
Wouldn't it be more sensible to omit the word "Duet" in this senten
trouty00;454354 Wrote:
> ok now I'm excited again that it can run SC. is album artwork going to
> be supported by the time is comes out of being a beta feature though?
Already working for me :)
--
autopilot
Cheers, auto.
*lounge:* squeezebox 3, squeezebox controller, cambridge audio 640a,
m
ok now I'm excited again that it can run SC. is album artwork going to
be supported by the time is comes out of being a beta feature though?
--
trouty00
trouty00's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
dave77;454349 Wrote:
> Apparently the Touch does run SqueezeCenter
It does run Squeezecenter, although many features are disabled. There
is no transcoding, no web interface and no support for the SliMP3 and
SB1.
But remember this *is* Squeezecenter, it isn't just showing you a list
of files on a
An interesting discussion going on here
http://www.avforums.com/forums/streamers-network-music-players/1021607-avforums-squeezebox-touch-discussion-thread-2.html#post10286010
Apparently the Touch does run SqueezeCenter
--
dave77
All we need to do is wait for it to turn up online.
No joy yet on the www.logitech.ch site or in online shops in
switzerland.
--
Sike
Sike's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2458
View this thread:
Mark Miksis;454328 Wrote:
> Yes, the Classic is being replaced by the Touch. We will continue to
> sell the Classic only until existing inventory is exhausted.
Is a new generation of the analog VU-meter available ?
--
epoch1970
dave77;454333 Wrote:
> http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/speakers_audio/wireless_music_systems/&cl=gb,en
>
> UK prices are a bit steep! How does $299 go to £259, hopefully Amazon
> will be cheaper
ouch seems overpriced to me, interestingly i looked at the classic for
my price comparison $299 tr
andynormancx;451870 Wrote:
> Maybe not, long term at least.
>
> The list price for the Boom in the US is $299, the list price for the
> Radio is $179. So the Radio is 60% of the price of the Boom.
>
> The street price for the Boom in the UK at the moment is £180, which
> would make the eventual
NeilT;454322 Wrote:
> It's not on the new matrix, is it being discontinued?
Yes, the Classic is being replaced by the Touch. We will continue to
sell the Classic only until existing inventory is exhausted.
--
Mark Miksis
---
It's not on the new matrix, is it being discontinued?
--
NeilT
NeilT's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=24306
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64706
http://www.logitechsqueezebox.com/product_matrix.html
- frantic
--
frantic
frantic's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31309
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64706
_
And official info for the Squeezebox Radio:
http://www.logitechsqueezebox.com/products/squeezebox-radio.html
--
elziko
elziko's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11835
View this thread: http://forum
Official info
http://www.logitechsqueezebox.com/products/squeezebox-touch.html#tab2
--
Paul Webster
Paul Webster
http://www.lastfm.com/user/BondJamesBond
Paul Webster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?us
frantic;454311 Wrote:
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Squeezeboxen-mit-Farbdisplay--/meldung/144687
>
> german language only, sorry.
>
> - frantic
and in English.
http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Squeezeboxen-mit-Farbdisplay--/meldung/1
Its launched. The online store link does not seem to be working... Get
a funny garbled select country screen.
--
lrossouw
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/lrossouw)
lrossouw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/me
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Squeezeboxen-mit-Farbdisplay--/meldung/144687
german language only, sorry.
- frantic
--
frantic
frantic's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31309
View this thread: ht
1st posting - no links allowed
- frantic
--
frantic
frantic's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31309
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64706
_
Justme;454218 Wrote:
>
> I personally am tired that I have to keep switching on my PC every time
> I listen to music. This was fine when I bought the device, but that is
> so retro these days.
IMHO, not having a "home media/file/web/whatever server" is retro...
Then I can get to my files from
funkstar;454042 Wrote:
> A specialist product like any of the Squeeze players are always going to
> be more expensive than generic mass produced (and I mean in the hundreds
> of thousands of units) hardware like netbooks. Logitech offer far better
> support and longer warranties than netbooks as
Yes :(
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !
andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.sl
Have these links been seen?
http://dabdig.blogspot.com/2009/06/logitech-squeezebox-touch-on-way.html
http://picasaweb.google.com/nilskp/SqueezeboxTouch?authkey=Gv1sRgCMq1rMLW7bfH7QE#
--
Labarum
Brian
Squeezebox 3 Classic and Virgin Cable Box
Beresford DAC TC-7520SE (Caiman) - Quad 405-2 re
funkstar;454042 Wrote:
> A specialist product like any of the Squeeze players are always going to
> be more expensive than generic mass produced (and I mean in the hundreds
> of thousands of units) hardware like netbooks. Logitech offer far better
> support and longer warranties than netbooks as
JadeMonkee;454050 Wrote:
> I think the best potential use for the new product would be installation
> in a car. The touch screen would actually save the hassle of having to
> mount the remote somewhere, and it'd look awesome in a dashboard.
> I would like to use it that way... only my car is not
I think the best potential use for the new product would be installation
in a car. The touch screen would actually save the hassle of having to
mount the remote somewhere, and it'd look awesome in a dashboard.
I would like to use it that way... only my car is not good enough (why
bother when the c
Sike;453812 Wrote:
> You can buy a notebook for 299 with a much larger screen.. running linux
> it would be fine with a nice full music library.
A specialist product like any of the Squeeze players are always going
to be more expensive than generic mass produced (and I mean in the
hundreds of tho
ghostrider;453775 Wrote:
> Can you imagine the processing power that would require. A lot more than
> you could buy for $299!
You can buy a notebook for 299 with a much larger screen.. running
linux it would be fine with a nice full music library.
--
Sike
-
Navier;453727 Wrote:
> Someone could me clarify if the Touch runs Squeezeserver internally or
> not !?!?
Can you imagine the processing power that would require. A lot more
than you could buy for $299!
--
ghostrider
gho
Navier;453727 Wrote:
> Someone could me clarify if the Touch runs Squeezeserver internally or
> not !?!?
No one is going to be able to do that until it official launches.
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !
---
Someone could me clarify if the Touch runs Squeezeserver internally or
not !?!?
--
Navier
Navier's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19768
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.p
I guess I'm in the minority but I quite like the SBC.
'car transportation' (http://www.cartransportquotes.com)
'auto shippers' (http://www.autotransportdepot.com)
--
linktoforumsf1
linktoforumsf1's Profile: http://forums.
Muele;453599 Wrote:
> I would really like this device for the kitchen. But I would mount it on
> the wall and it looks like all the wires point out of the back, making
> wall mount imposible. It's a shame since they could probably pretty
> easily have pointed them downwards, had they thought of i
If you want a larger screen touch screen remote why not buy one of these
http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htm and the browser with a
touch screen skin.
--
bpa
bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.p
I use another solution for the controller. I have a Philips Pronto 9400
touch screen remote control with an application to control the
Squeezebox. It is not a very cheap solution but the application is
embedded in a remotecontrol-only solution, which I think is ideal.
Controlling my home equipment
I would really like this device for the kitchen. But I would mount it on
the wall and it looks like all the wires point out of the back, making
wall mount imposible. It's a shame since they could probably pretty
easily have pointed them downwards, had they thought of it.
--
Muele
BR Mogens
2
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:06 PM,
Nostromo
wrote:
> I have a SB3. I thought of buying a Controller, but the standard RF
> remote is faster, more efficient, thanks to lazysearch. I haven't seen
> one in real life, but the Harmony 1000 looks huge... Plus, its too
> expensive. The sweetspot would be so
Nostromo;453557 Wrote:
> Remove the touch screen (something people will rarely use anyway), put a
> bigger LCD instead, keep the other Squeezebox Touch extras like native
> 24bit/96kHz support (although I suspect I couldn't hear the difference)
> and voilà! you have the SB4.
Exactly And it has a
tcutting;453546 Wrote:
> I'm anxious to hear what feedback comes from the "early adopters" of the
> Touch product. My impressions from what I've seen of the specs, is that
> this product will be more of a "SB3+" than a preferred controller.
> First, native 24bit/96kHz support. Next, color disp
iPhone;453533 Wrote:
> Your signature doesn't list the Squeezebox products you own, but from
> your post I take it you don't own a Duet! Don't get me wrong, I would
> love to see a Controller mated to a Harmony 1000. I love my 1000 and
> like my Controller. But I love my 1000 and iPeng even more.
radish;453548 Wrote:
> I guess I'm in the minority but I quite like the SBC. It's certainly not
> perfect, but if I want to control one of my players and I'm not in front
> of my PC that's what I grab. Whilst I appreciate the technical
> achievement of iPeng, for me personally it's nothing more t
iPhone;453533 Wrote:
> Your signature doesn't list the Squeezebox products you own, but from
> your post I take it you don't own a Duet! Don't get me wrong, I would
> love to see a Controller mated to a Harmony 1000. I love my 1000 and
> like my Controller. But I love my 1000 and iPeng even more.
Nostromo;453532 Wrote:
> However, I have absolutely no use for the Squeezebox Touch.
I'm anxious to hear what feedback comes from the "early adopters" of
the Touch product. My impressions from what I've seen of the specs, is
that this product will be more of a "SB3+" than a preferred controller
froth wrote:
> Why not offer options like mains / power network adapters branded as
> Logitec bundeled as part of the package. Beter yet, could also have
> these part of the product just plug in and away you go. The only
> issue you have then is the controller but at least that can definatly
This probably will look nice sitting on a table or counter somewhere,
but it will only be as good as the back end and infrastructure
supporting it.
Hopefully for as much as what is going into the user interface of these
devices, one would hope the same goes into the other pieces.
I believe the n
Nostromo;453525 Wrote:
> Frankly, I don't see the point of this product. I don't understand why
> they didn't design a touch remote instead.
Your signature doesn't list the Squeezebox products you own, but from
your post I take it you don't own a Duet! Don't get me wrong, I would
love to see a C
Ben Sandee;453526 Wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:20 PM,
> Nostromo forums.slimdevices.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Frankly, I don't see the point of this product. I don't understand
> why
> > they didn't design a touch remote instead.
>
> Because it wouldn't be price/feature competitive with an iPo
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:20 PM,
Nostromo
wrote:
>
> Frankly, I don't see the point of this product. I don't understand why
> they didn't design a touch remote instead.
Because it wouldn't be price/feature competitive with an iPod touch + ipeng?
Ben
___
Frankly, I don't see the point of this product. I don't understand why
they didn't design a touch remote instead.
--
Nostromo
http://www.last.fm/user/Guermantez/
Nostromo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.ph
If you look at news.google.com it is as good as released. Also check
out:
http://gizmodo.com/5348056/logitech-squeezebox-touch-desktop-audio-player-looks-lickable-too
I think it's time for Slimdevices to fess up, at least they could
control the info that way and tell us the specs. The touch appe
Don't remember. I setup a Google Alert for the touch and the Berlin show
was mentioned in several PR type releases I received links to.
--
firedog
Tranquil PC fanless server running SqueezeCenter; SB Duet through
Empirical Audio Pace Car; TACT 2.2XP; MF X-150,Sonus Faber Concerto;
Mirage MS-12
firedog;453062 Wrote:
> To be officially unveiled at IFA 2009 Sept 4- Sept. 9 in Berlin.
Source?
--
verypsb
2x Duet, 1x Boom, 1x Classic
verypsb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17295
View this
To be officially unveiled at IAF 2009 Sept 4- Sept. 9 in Berlin.
--
firedog
Tranquil PC fanless server running SqueezeCenter; SB Duet through
Empirical Audio Pace Car; TACT 2.2XP; MF X-150,Sonus Faber Concerto;
Mirage MS-12 sub; Dual 506 + Ortofon 20 (occasional use); sometimes use
PC with M-A
trefork;452437 Wrote:
> I did not, no. I don't care enough to spend hours on this.
Well even if you did get help from the CSR at SD I'd guess that would
be the very first question (and suggestion) from a properly trained CSR
that you must be running SC7.4.x for your Touch to function properly.
mrfantasy;452405 Wrote:
> I assume you tried Squeezebox Server 7.4 to run it?
I did not, no. I don't care enough to spend hours on this.
--
trefork
trefork's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6183
Sike;452400 Wrote:
> My thoughts exactly. They should of squeezed an extra inch in..
And made it OLED.
--
trefork
trefork's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6183
View this thread: http://forums.sl
NeilT;452430 Wrote:
>
> Has anyone worked out what the USB host and SD card slots are for yet?
> Or are they for future use? I have a horrible feeling that they are just
> going to be used to load photos to use the Touch as a picture frame.
>
The blurb on the box in one of the shots talks about
Sike;452400 Wrote:
> My thoughts exactly. They should of squeezed an extra inch in..
I agree. It looks like a digital picture frame from a few years ago. I
think it needs to be smaller, or have a bigger screen,even if it's a bit
more expensive. The Classic looks good on a shelf, this looks cheap.
trefork;452302 Wrote:
> Got mine yesterday. It's stuck on a Software Update screen. Called
> support and talked to Anoop. He claimed that no such product exists. I
> tried telling him that I had one in my living room, but he insisted that
> no such product existed. So far all I have is a brick, u
As I suggested in my blog - IFA in Berlin is next week (4-9 September).
I'd be very suprised if it is not announced there - and it would be a
better announcement if they said it was shipping.
The fact that an order has shipped shows that the device is in
warehouses.
Revo are sure to be hyping the
strindberg;452386 Wrote:
> Thanks for the pictures. I must say the screen looks disappointingly
> small when compared to the size of the whole Touch. I wonder if it
> really will be big enough to be useful.
My thoughts exactly. They should of squeezed an extra inch in..
--
Sike
--
trefork;452302 Wrote:
> Got mine yesterday. It's stuck on a Software Update screen. Called
> support and talked to Anoop. He claimed that no such product exists. I
> tried telling him that I had one in my living room, but he insisted that
> no such product existed. So far all I have is a brick, u
This isn't looking good.
Something official from Logitech would be nice.
--
Raptor
Raptor's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13132
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=6
Thanks for the pictures. I must say the screen looks disappointingly
small when compared to the size of the whole Touch. I wonder if it
really will be big enough to be useful.
--
strindberg
strindberg's Profile: http://for
So can one of you tell us if it actually natively streams 24/96 without
downsampling? That's the feature I'm interested in.
thanks
--
firedog
Tranquil PC fanless server running SqueezeCenter; SB Duet through
Empirical Audio Pace Car; TACT 2.2XP; MF X-150,Sonus Faber Concerto;
Mirage MS-12 sub
Definitely an IR remote control then (no surprise really). It's listed
in the package contents in those photos.
--
DoomWolf
DoomWolf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8839
View this thread: http://
http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/squeezebox-touch-unboxed-and-in-the-wild/
--
Espen
Espen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15057
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=
Got mine yesterday. It's stuck on a Software Update screen. Called
support and talked to Anoop. He claimed that no such product exists. I
tried telling him that I had one in my living room, but he insisted that
no such product existed. So far all I have is a brick, until Logitech
"releases" it and
Plank;452188 Wrote:
> I was able to order a Touch before it was taken off the website. I was
> even emailed an order number. I am not sure what will happen next.
Awesome , do post back here if you get an estimated delivery date :)
--
Mnyb
---
I was able to order a Touch before it was taken off the website. I was
even emailed an order number. I am not sure what will happen next.
--
Plank
Plank's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32461
Vi
morris_minor;451987 Wrote:
> Yes - you're undoubtedly right. But other products are described as
> having an infrared remote. I don't think of my TV zapper et al as being
> "wireless" devices - other than having, er, no wires :0)
New products, great !!
And I move in with my girlfriend in 4 week
DoomWolf;451845 Wrote:
> I guess the remote is IR as it's also listed on the Logitech store at
> $19.99, which to me sounds like the price of an IR device not wifi.
Yes - you're undoubtedly right. But other products are described as
having an infrared remote. I don't think of my TV zapper et al
dave77;451866 Wrote:
>
> That would put the radio at around £110 (probably £130 with UK tax
> etc...), too much IMO
Maybe not, long term at least.
The list price for the Boom in the US is $299, the list price for the
Radio is $179. So the Radio is 60% of the price of the Boom.
The street price
Goodsounds;451778 Wrote:
> So then what's more funny and fitting, now the products appear on the
> company's own website before they are officially announced!
It is a touch inept.
--
ModelCitizen
On average people have fewer than two feet.
Last.fm/user/ModelCitizen
--
And they're doing the radio in red?!
That would put the radio at around £110 (probably £130 with UK tax
etc...), too much IMO
--
dave77
dave77's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=26269
View this thr
I guess the remote is IR as it's also listed on the Logitech store at
$19.99, which to me sounds like the price of an IR device not wifi.
> Squeezebox Touch, Remote Control for Squeezebox Touch
> Remote Control for Squeezebox Touch
> USD 19.99
--
DoomWolf
--
morris_minor;451842 Wrote:
> "Up close, the player uses an intuitive, fun-to-use color touch screen.
> From the sofa, you use the included wireless remote."
>
> This is the first mention (that I've seen) of a wireless (not IR)
> remote for the Touch. A "mini-Controller"? If it works with the Tou
tipsen;451767 Wrote:
>
> Squeezebox Touch listed at $299:
> http://buy.logitech.com/DRHM/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayHomePage&SiteID=logib2c&Locale=en_US&CallingPageID=HomePage&Env=BASE&startIndex=360
>
"Up close, the player uses an intuitive, fun-to-use color touch screen.
>From t
They have been bird-dogging premature web displays by retailers and
(presumably) have been getting them yanked. The same thing happened
before with other new products.
So then what's more funny and fitting, now the products appear on the
company's own website before they are officially announced
Spotted the Squeezebox Touch ($299) as well as the Squeezebox Radio
($179) at Logitech Store - apparently open for pre-order (?):
Squeezebox Radio in black and red (!) listed at $179 (near bottom at
the moment):
http://buy.logitech.com/DRHM/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayHomePage&SiteID=
Mnyb;451067 Wrote:
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=66878
>
> follow the links in post 3 to see pictures
Thanks for the link, but looking at that small display I can say this
won't work for me. I love the display on the boom and think it is
perfect for a clock radio beside the b
trouty00;451068 Wrote:
> some more info, hopefully im not repeating anyone didnt see anything
> before
This is indeed a repetition - thread for that particular device
starting with that particular Engadget post began on 21st
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=66878&page=4
--
Paul
1 - 100 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
