On Thursday 03 March 2005 08:21, + V Venkatesh wrote:
> [ MODERATED ] ***
> Suggestion:
>
> Downsampling of bitmaps should be a user option. For both printing and
> exporting to PDF. So also, an option for image compresson - uncompressed,
> ZIP, LZW, packbits, etc. Acrobat re
On Monday 07 March 2005 22:10, + Ray wrote:
> I was wondering as you upgrade your product if you ever considered
> creating a product like Microsoft publisher
You can use OpenOffice.org is similar ways to publisher. Please have a loot on
newsforge.org as they publishedf such an article in the las
On Sunday 06 March 2005 13:58, + Softhome wrote:
> [ MODERATED ] ***
> Hello discuss,
>
> I have been checking your site often in hopes of finding the OO 2.0.
> I got it the first day, tried it for 2 days and was sufficiently
> satisfied to uninstall the 1.4 version. I'm
Sunday, March 6, 2005 Jeroen de Cloe wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an idea for Open Office PDF generation:
> Every item in the document Table of Contents could optionally be
> exported as a hyperlink
> that links to the correct page/location in the PDF.
This is already possible in OOo 2.0 beta
--
Giu
I downloaded it at home last night and plan installing it and running
it tonight if all goes well.
I will let everyone know the results.
regards
alastairh
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:35:00 -0800 (PST), Mr Rigel Anrndt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dag Veidal. This kind of thing would be better dire
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 13:00, Ian Laurenson wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 14:38, Piotr Kozbial wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was forced to move from Lyx/Latex to MS-Word/OpenOffice. Both word
> > processors are great, however in Lyx I have colapsable "notes", that are
> > not printable. "Note" in Lyx
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 14:38, Piotr Kozbial wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was forced to move from Lyx/Latex to MS-Word/OpenOffice. Both word
> processors are great, however in Lyx I have colapsable "notes", that are
> not printable. "Note" in Lyx is just a fragment of text (framed and
> highlited). In OO a
> From the lack of response to my posts on both this
> list and on 'users' it
> seems nobody is as passionate about mail merge as I
> am. I had hoped
> I might get a discussion going but it seems that few
> people are
> interested.
It seems now harder to use a spreadsheet as a source
for mail
Hi,
I have an idea for Open Office PDF generation:
Every item in the document Table of Contents could optionally be
exported as a hyperlink
that links to the correct page/location in the PDF.
Best regards,
Jeroen
--
*Jeroen
Hi Dag Veidal. This kind of thing would be better directed to the product bug
reporting online forum, called "Issue Zilla" and is available from the home
page of OpenOffice.org
http://www.openoffice.org/project/qa/issue_handling/project_issues.html
That way the report can be indexed and acces
Hello discuss,
I have been checking your site often in hopes of finding the OO 2.0.
I got it the first day, tried it for 2 days and was sufficiently
satisfied to uninstall the 1.4 version. I'm almost ready to
uninstall MS-Office as I don't use it much any way. I prefer OO calc
hands down
Hi,
I have been a very happy user of OpenOffice (for Windows) both at work and for
private use for the last couple of months, and I was eager to download and test
the new 2.0(beta)version . I have only been using this version for two days,
but one thing seem to occur every single time when test
Hi,
I was forced to move from Lyx/Latex to MS-Word/OpenOffice. Both word
processors are great, however in Lyx I have colapsable "notes", that are
not printable. "Note" in Lyx is just a fragment of text (framed and
highlited). In OO and MS-word, notes are small, can not be long, and in
most case
I was wondering as you upgrade your product if you ever considered
creating a product like Microsoft publisher
On 7 Mar 2005 at 19:22, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Tony Pursell wrote:
>
> > The problem with the new Wizard is that it is the only way to easily
> > get the multi letter file. But there are lots of scenarios,
> > particularly in the business world (which I'm sure we would all like
> > to see OO.o u
Andrews wrote:
> Following on the PDF concept - if Openoffice had a "final" command that
> automatically converted a file to PDF, marked it final and date stamped
> it (or digitally signed it), and then cleared the original this could be
> a solution. It would then be nice to have a PDF viewer
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 01:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are using your product for a long time and are enjoing using it.
> We are using LaTEX too and having difficulties in converting
> documents from LaTEX format to OOo format. Do you plan to include
> converter LaTEX-OOo in the next releases
Tony Pursell wrote:
> The problem with the new Wizard is that it is the only way to easily get
> the multi letter file. But there are lots of scenarios, particularly in the
> business world (which I'm sure we would all like to see OO.o used in)
> where the Wizard would fall short of what is ne
Daniel Carrera wrote:
> http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/invoice.sxc
Incidentally, this is how I did this:
* Select the "quantity" cells, that is, the cells I *do* want people
to change.
* Format > Cells > Cell Protection.
* Uncheck "Protected" and click OK.
* Tools > ProtectDocument > S
Mr Rigel Anrndt wrote:
> nope. No clue. I simply tossed out general trouble shooting advice.
LaTeX is a file format designed by a mathematecian, for writing
mathematical papers. It makes writing equations very easy. It is a markup,
like HTML. For example:
\(
(f*g)(t)=\int _{0}^{t}f(x)g(t-x)
Martin J Hooper wrote:
> I think that what he is trying to say is have the cells that you don't
> want to edit made read-only and whatever data you want or need to edit
> as read-write.
>
> Not quite sure how you would do it with Ooo though...
Here's an example. I think this does what you guys
nope. No clue. I simply tossed out general trouble shooting advice.
Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uhmmm... Rigel, do you know what LaTeX is?
Cheers,
Daniel.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 01:52:01PM -0800, Mr Rigel Anrndt wrote:
> If LaTex can export to Rich Text Format or Unicode, then O
Uhmmm... Rigel, do you know what LaTeX is?
Cheers,
Daniel.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 01:52:01PM -0800, Mr Rigel Anrndt wrote:
> If LaTex can export to Rich Text Format or Unicode, then OOo should have no
> problem importing those file types. Check the list of export options for
> LaTEX, and then
If LaTex can export to Rich Text Format or Unicode, then OOo should have no
problem importing those file types. Check the list of export options for LaTEX,
and then verify the import options for OOo. You might find a solution there,
for in the mean time.
Rigel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
De
Dear OpenOffice.org developers!
We are using your product for a long time and are enjoing using it.
We are using LaTEX too and having difficulties in converting
documents from LaTEX format to OOo format. Do you plan to include
converter LaTEX-OOo in the next releases of the office suite? We need i
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 09:03, Andrews wrote:
[snip]
>
> Another issue that I mentioned in my first email is the possibility of
> turning a spreadsheet into an input form that users would only be able
> to enter specified fields that the "form" would prompt them to fill in
> and the entry validat
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 01:28, CPH wrote:
> On Sunday 06 March 2005 09:59, Andrews wrote:
> [snip]
> > Finally - what you have done, creating free and very useful software,
> > is a fantastic service to computer users all over the world - I just
> > have a concern that eventually the lack of finan
Daniel Carrera wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean. You could "protect" the cells with the
formulae, and then sign the document. Wouldn't that work?
I think that what he is trying to say is have the cells that you don't
want to edit made read-only and whatever data you want or need to edit
as read
Andrews wrote:
> I firmly believe there is a need to provide document users with the
> certainty that what they are using is actually final.
This is what the new digital signature system is supposed to provide. The
file is still editable, but if you edit it, the digital signature will
break an
Justin Fitzgibbon wrote:
> This security should be on two levels - lower which allows
changes on entering a password and locked _which prevents changes ever
being made.
If the contents of a document can be decrypted in order to view it
theres no way to then lock it against changes, or prev
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Andrews wrote:
Thanks for the reply - thought the format could be a problem, I suppose
one could export to PDF and then clear the original sheet - I am not
sure though how easy the PDF format could be edited.
PDF is not an editable format.
Give me a while to think ab
Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Found it:
>
> http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html
Lars, could you help me extend/expand this letter? It doesn't say anything
about regular uses, software writers and small businesses.
And it doesn't link to the page you just posted.
Cheers,
--
Daniel Carrera
Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Lars, could you help me put down sample letters? Or else, tell me where I
> can find them?
Found it:
http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html
Cheers,
--
Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.or
Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> Do write to your council representatives and parliament members.
> ... again if you have already done so.
Lars, could you help me put down sample letters? Or else, tell me where I
can find them?
You see, if I were an European citizen, I wouldn't know how to write a
lett
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, spencer wrote:
How do you find who your represenative is?
It's not easy. It's amlost as if that were secret information.
Here's what I've found so far:
Parliament members
http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/ep6/owa/p_meps2.repartition?ilg=EN
Commission members
http:/
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, p cooper wrote:
[...]
The first TP will be when the opposition cant ignore you.
I would posit that this occurred in 1998 as evidenced by the "Halloween
Papers" and by the anti-OSS/anit-Linux FUD-storm that has followed.
With MS this will be when they significantly drop their b
>>
> Hi,
> I thought you folks would be interested in this.
> http://wiki.ffii.org/Cons050307En
>
On a commentary I read:
"The directive will now be passed to European Parliament, which can reject or
amend the proposal, for a second reading."
If so (who can confirm?) this is the right moment (
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 09:08 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> It's not over, but it has gotten more difficult.
>
> Do write to your council representatives and parliament members.
> ... again if you have already done so.
How do you find who your represenative is?
>
> It's too bad that none of the
It's not over, but it has gotten more difficult.
Do write to your council representatives and parliament members.
... again if you have already done so.
It's too bad that none of the press mentions that it's more than
developers who are affected. Patents govern *use* so that means that
anyone us
Hi,
I thought you folks would be interested in this.
http://wiki.ffii.org/Cons050307En
A sad day:(
Later
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Izak wrote:
> Hello Group.
>
> Using OOo beta2.0 on linux it seems to be impossible to open any ms-word
> templates. Can someone please try and confirm?
Already confirmed and fixed: :-)
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42411
Best regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.
Kurt Cagle wrote:
http://www.understandingxml.com/archives/2005/03/xforms_editor_i.html
Hello Kurt
Thank you for alerting us to your mini-review and rave about XForms in
OpenOffice.org.
I have cross-posted to the OpenOffice.org Marketing Project. When we
were going throught the list of features
Enrique wrote:
> But I do feel like Byfield and others that Impress redesigners have let
> themselves drop in the "eye candy" mistake. I feel that some functions
> that are simple in 1.1.4 are complicated by the new design.
I must confess that at first I also had this impression at least
sometime
43 matches
Mail list logo
