Mails are flying around so don't think it is anything to do with the list...
/paul
On 10/20/05, Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not received any emails from this list for the last day and a half. Is
there a problem with
your server? I checked the archives online and there have
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
All,
OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Here
20 October, 2005
OpenOffice.org 2.0 is the productivity suite that individuals,
governments, and corporations around the world have been expecting
for the last two years. Easy to use and fluidly interoperable with
every major
From the help:
XML File Formats
By default, OpenOffice.org loads and saves files in the OpenDocument
file format.
The OpenDocument file format is an XML file format standardized by OASIS
http://www.oasis-open.org/ (Organization for the Advancement of
Structured Information
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 15:40 -0700, Gregory Forster wrote:
I'm glad I'm not the only one that had that problem.
Greg
--- Shari Lynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of my searches brought up links that actually
worked :o(
example text received:
Not Found
The requested URL
Mark wrote:
in essence, an underline function that is only as long as the text.
Sounds like you want:CTRLF12 Paragraph styles Underlining
Then check the check box Individual Words.
xan
jonathon
--
Does your Office Suite conform to ISO Standards?
Hi Daniel,
/** Makes a boost::shared_ptr from a ref-counted UNO object pointer.
This makes sense if the object is used via UNO (implementing some X
interface) and also internally using its implementation class, e.g.
Hmm. What's the advantage of this over using
::rtl::Reference
Hi Jürgen,
cppuhelper/basemutex.hxxbr
class BaseMutex
{
protected:
mutable ::osl::Mutex m_mutex;
};
If we would have naming conventions across projects, and m_mutex would
have been named m_aMutex, then ::comphelper::OBaseMutex - which serves
exactly the same purpose - could have been
Thanks for the links. I signed the petition and put a a link on my links page.
It is quite
low volume but every bit helps.
On 20 Oct 2005 at 15:11, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Hello all,
Microsoft has said that they will support OpenDocument in MS Office if
there is customer demand for it.
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:57:46 +0100, Lars D. Noodén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the new file extensions for the OpenDocument formats?
-Lars
(Sorry, I can't just look because there's no recent version for OS X
yet.)
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On the Internet, nobody knows
Op do 20okt05 om 19:23 schreef John Boyle:
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
I know what she wrote.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Microsoft has said that they will support OpenDocument in MS Office if
there is customer demand for it.
I must say that I really don't know whether this would be a good or a
bad thing.
I can easily imagine Microsoft supporting OpenDocument to the
Hi Frank,
Hmm. What's the advantage of this over using
::rtl::Reference MyUnoImpl ptr( new MyUnoImpl );
xUno-callingUno( uno::ReferenceXSomeInterface( ptr.get() ) );
takeNonUnoPtr( ptr );
There is no advantage over the example you gave.
But it eases the implementation if you _already
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
cppuhelper/basemutex.hxxbr
class BaseMutex
{
protected:
mutable ::osl::Mutex m_mutex;
};
If we would have naming conventions across projects, and m_mutex would
have been named m_aMutex, then ::comphelper::OBaseMutex - which
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 12:47 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Microsoft has said that they will support OpenDocument in MS Office if
there is customer demand for it.
I must say that I really don't know whether this would be a good or a
bad thing.
I
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 12:47 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Microsoft has said that they will support OpenDocument in MS Office if
there is customer demand for it.
I must say that I really don't know whether this would be a good or a
bad thing.
It's
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
cppuhelper/basemutex.hxxbr
class BaseMutex
{
protected:
mutable ::osl::Mutex m_mutex;
};
If we would have naming conventions across projects, and m_mutex would
have been named m_aMutex, then
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 12:47 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
I can easily imagine Microsoft supporting OpenDocument to the extent
that it nearly works, and then OOo will get the blame when documents
cannot be read properly.
I'm also sure that
Open Office is not installing under Windows XP64. Does anyone has more
information?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since I apparently can't submit a bug without an account, and I can't
get an account without going through the site admin, hopefully this will
help someone...
To crash OO.Org (I know not all of this is relevant to the bug, but this
is what I originally did to trigger it):
1) Dock the
Hi,
I just wanted to complement you on doing a great job but I do have just pet
peef; the transparancy of your website. Of course everything is there, but
is not very transparant.I admit it does have a business-like appeal but if
you take a look at skype.com or ubuntu.com, which are also
Much enjoying open office 2.0, although I really would like to see the
Word-style highlight and hit tab to indent feature.
Anyway, what I really wanted to suggest was: post-it notes. Obviously,
3m have a kind of digital post-it note, but it's separate and not really
very much use. What would be
Your quick launch button displays a drop down menu that show FROM Templates
(should be FORM template).
Don't know if this is the right place to bring this up or not. This is the
first time I've used openoffice. Seems great but will take getting used to.
Debbie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Imagine all
Hi there
Thank you very much for all these years effort of putting up openoffice 2.0.
I am very happy using openoffice all this while.
Just a little idea for all of you to ponder on. All the years of using
spreadsheet software, be it MS Excel, Quattro Pro etc (including
openoffice), I always
Hi!
I just want to give some feedback. I am a not so advanced user of PC´s. I´ve
been clicking my way round your site and just keeps coming back to the same
spot without any downloading happening! So now I give up.
Maybe someone could think of making the pages more clear and obvious, since
why haven't you ported this to OpenVMS yet?
There would be a huge market for this!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a user of WordPerfect 6.0a, and find that Open Office
won't convert my files ... what can I do?
Also, I have found using hyper-text links useful for linking
files; is this possible in O.O.? (I think a different name may
be used.)
--
John Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.bigfoot.com/~jha
Hi,
after having downloaded and unpacked OpenOffice.org for Linux I was
amazed to find a bag of rpm files but no hint whatsoever on how to
install. Am I expected to solve a puzzle? Don't you think it would be a
good idea to put a how-to-install info into the readme folder? Or at
least put it
Hi, just wanted to say that I love the new Openoffice and wanted to offer a
recommendation or two concerning Japanese input in writer. It is possible
that some of these functions are already available and that I simply have
not found out how to use them but I have done some researched to make sure
I believe others on this list have successfully installed OOo on
XP64 What error messages are being returned?
/paul
On 10/22/05, K Kush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Open Office is not installing under Windows XP64. Does anyone has more
information?
Hello Eduardo,
The OpenDocument Fellowship has a lot of information that might help you
make a case for OpenDocument in your school:
http://opendocumentfellowship.org/
Two days ago we started a petition for Microsoft to support
OpenDocument. It is an attempt to demonstrate that there /is/
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:34:00 +0100, Eduardo Martinez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
My name is Eduardo Martinez and I am a student at Humboldt State
University,
located in Arcata California.
II want to start to work on a proposition in my school to promote the
use of
OO on a campus
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:42:53 +0100, Arno Inen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it does have a business-like appeal but if you take a look at skype.com
Skype has A LOT of information on the front page.
--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
The error message I get is the installer is corrupt or incomplete -- I
guess it is the Windows XP64 installer?? I am having the same problem when
I try to install Java Run Time -- the Java installs but the cup icon does
not appear and so I cannot configure it. It seems it is a related
The page you want is here (navigated to with one click from the front page):
http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.0/index.html
You have to answer the three questions on that page, then the download
should start. If not, then report back to the list with specific
error...
/paul
On 10/21/05,
Potentially... but just to check, have you done the MD5 check on the
OOo download to make sure that it is not corrupt?
/paul
On 10/22/05, K Kush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error message I get is the installer is corrupt or incomplete -- I
guess it is the Windows XP64 installer?? I am
IMHO I think 'from' is correct since, when selected, you are taken to
a place where you select from many templates. You select one 'from'
the template store.
/paul
On 10/21/05, Debra Gaeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your quick launch button displays a drop down menu that show FROM Templates
Are there any? Is there an interest group or community that develops
and shares knowledge about legal documents for submission to courts
(briefs, petitions, etc.)?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Hallo,
ich habe einen Fehler in der OpenOffice-Version RC1 gefunden:
Thema Serienbriefe mit folgendem Sachverhalt:
in einer Calc-Liste ist eine Spalte als PLZ für Postleitzahl
definiert. Diese ist im Format Text, da ansonsten die
Postleitzahlengebiete, die mit einer 0 anfangen, fehlerhaft
On Thu October 20 2005 20:00, + Seth Hieronymus wrote:
[ MODERATED ] ***
Since I apparently can't submit a bug without an account, and I can't
get an account without going through the site admin, hopefully this will
help someone...
To crash OO.Org (I know not all of this
On Fri October 21 2005 14:17, + Bob Ceculski wrote:
[ MODERATED ] ***
why haven't you ported this to OpenVMS yet?
The people able to do this has not come forward yet.
There would be a huge market for this!
If you would like to be the hero for that huge market please have
On Fri October 21 2005 12:28, + ADC GmbH wrote:
[ MODERATED ] ***
Hallo,
ich habe einen Fehler in der OpenOffice-Version RC1 gefunden:
Thema Serienbriefe mit folgendem Sachverhalt:
in einer Calc-Liste ist eine Spalte als PLZ für Postleitzahl
definiert. Diese ist im
Hey Folks,
Not to get angry or anything, but I think the opening page is a
touch misleading for Mac owners. You click that you want to download
2.0, you select Macintosh as your OS, and you eagerly await the
ability to download the program. Unfortunately, you're told not to use
2.0 for Mac for
Gary Bowen wrote:
OOo 2.0 install to Windows 98SE will not run due to error...
Unpack works fine
Setup immediately generates error ...cannot find file . and closes
Same file installed on Win2k just fine.
Regards,
Gary Bowen
Robert Derman replies: I had 2.0 do the same thing on
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 08:51 -0400, Chuck wrote:
Just thought I post a message here to see if anyone on the
dbaneedsconfirm list is reading. I opened issue 52451 several months ago
and it's still in unconfirmed state. I am wondering if anyone is even
looking at OOo 2.0 database issues. IMO the
Ian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are enough knowledgeable people out there to make this too risky
for MS to even contemplate. If their apps don't produce pure and clean
ODF rest assured it will be all over the Internet within hours.
Severe bugs in Windows and IE frequently hit the
JH Atkinson (Mr) wrote:
I am a user of WordPerfect 6.0a, and find that Open Office
won't convert my files ... what can I do?
Get new OOo 2.0 -- it uses libwpd library for reading WP documents and among
the features mentioned on http://libwpd.sourceforge.net/features.html is
reading WP 6 files.
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* People don't trust Microsoft now. They are under the radar of a lot
of world governments, and people expect them to try dirty tricks.
I'm afraid 99% of the PC users just use Microsoft software, and don't
think about it.
* OOo is the reference
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 16:14 -0500, Simon Dodd wrote:
Much enjoying open office 2.0, although I really would like to see the
Word-style highlight and hit tab to indent feature.
Anyway, what I really wanted to suggest was: post-it notes. Obviously,
3m have a kind of digital post-it note, but
Johan Vromans wrote:
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* People don't trust Microsoft now. They are under the radar of a lot
of world governments, and people expect them to try dirty tricks.
I'm afraid 99% of the PC users just use Microsoft software, and don't
think about it.
It's
Johan Vromans wrote:
* OOo is the reference implementation of ODF.
What is required are at least two independent implementations that
support it. Having one reference implementation is a start, but not
sufficient.
Abiword, KOffice, Gnumeric.
* ODF is already supported by KOffice, SO, IBM
mark wrote:
I'm afraid 99% of the PC users just use Microsoft software, and don't
think about it.
It's about 94% now, and dropping.
It's down to at most 88%. OOo alone has a 12% market share. And with the
EU and Massachusetts giving ODF the thumbs up, the prospects of the
format are
On 10/21/05, Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mark wrote:
I'm afraid 99% of the PC users just use Microsoft software, and don't
think about it.
It's about 94% now, and dropping.
It's down to at most 88%. OOo alone has a 12% market share.
Um, the OP said MIcrosoft *SOFTWARE*
This may not affect many people these days, but the linux Mozilla plugin
depends on libgcc3.3 and would not load on one of my systems until I
updated gcc from 3.2.3 to 3.3.4
The rest of OOo-2.0 worked fine with the old libraries.
--
John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:10:16 +0100, Christoph Herzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
after having downloaded and unpacked OpenOffice.org for Linux I was
amazed to find a bag of rpm files but no hint whatsoever on how to
install. Am I expected to solve a puzzle? Don't you think it would be a
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:17:56 +0100, Steve Lipson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In your language choices for downloading OpenOffice, all of the
languages are identified by their English names (German French
etc.,) except for Finnish and Czech. At first glance, I didn't think
Finnish was
Friday, October 21, 2005 JH Atkinson (Mr) wrote:
I am a user of WordPerfect 6.0a, and find that Open Office
won't convert my files ... what can I do?
What version of OOo are you using? Verions 2.0 (just
released) should be able to import your files.
Also, I have found using hyper-text links
Chad Smith wrote:
And, i totally doubt OOo has anything close to a 12% share.
Show me some evidence - and it should be more than just download numbers
since I have personally downloaded OOo about 75 times.
* Yankee Group estimates that OOo has 19% market share in SMBs:
The previous stable versions didn't convert WP 6.0a, if I remember correctly.
However, all the beta versions, including 1.9.125 do convert, with no
intermediate steps. I'm sure that has been retained in the new 2.0.
I do a lot of work in WP and print a daily journal every night using OOo.
Chad Smith wrote:
On 10/21/05, Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mark wrote:
I'm afraid 99% of the PC users just use Microsoft software, and don't
think about it.
It's about 94% now, and dropping.
It's down to at most 88%. OOo alone has a 12% market share.
Um, the OP said
Johan Vromans wrote:
* OOo is the reference implementation of ODF.
What is required are at least two independent implementations that
support it. Having one reference implementation is a start, but not
sufficient.
How can you read attached file? Hint: I do not have OOo 2.0 installed (it is
Matej Cepl wrote:
How can you read attached file? Hint: I do not have OOo 2.0 installed (it is
not available for Debian/testing yet).
You can download Debian packages for OOo 2.0 from here:
http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.0/instructions.html#other_linux
Or you can use Abiword 2.4.0:
On 10/21/05, Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Yankee Group estimates that OOo has 19% market share in SMBs:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=19_percent_market_share_in
The actual story - found here:
Chad Smith wrote:
There are no links and no references to any studies or surveys to back that
up.
Uhmm... Laura Didio *is* a Yankee spokesperson and she said that's what
they found. You probably have to pay for the study. That's how these
groups make money.
* Forrester study suggests
Does one have to uninstall 1.15 before trying to uninstall version 2.0?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While people have complained about the lack of .debs for over a year,
nobody seems to have actually filed an issue.
Now, I have. It's 56423, if anyone cares to add their comments or votes.
--
Bruce Byfield 604-421.7177
http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:34:33 +0100, John Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does one have to uninstall 1.15 before trying to uninstall version 2.0?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 10/21/05, Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In contrast, your claim that OOo is nowhere near 12% is entirely without
evidence. I have presented links to back up my estimate, and you have not.
Presenting 2 bogus links does not give me any thing to have to present
evidence against.
John Boyle wrote:
Does one have to uninstall 1.15 before trying to uninstall version 2.0?
Robert Derman replies: No! It may be nessisary to uninstall beta
versions of 2.0, but it is absolutely not nessisary to remove any 1.x
versions.
68 matches
Mail list logo
