Every time I boot my machine and then start OpenOffice.org, I get an
error message:
"Either another instance of OpenOffice.org is accessing your
personal settings or your personal settings are locked. [...] Do you
really want to continue?"
I didn't have this before. It started somewhere around
Ernst,
Ernst de Haan wrote:
Every time I boot my machine and then start OpenOffice.org, I get an
error message:
"Either another instance of OpenOffice.org is accessing your
personal settings or your personal settings are locked. [...] Do you
really want to continue?"
I didn't have this befor
if I understand correctly, this message keeps popping up, with every
start of OOo?!
No, with every boot. And at boot time, OOo automatically starts the
quickstarter. And then I get the error message.
OOo checks for a running instance by looking for a .lock file in the
user preferences (~/.open
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Ernst,
Ernst de Haan wrote:
Every time I boot my machine and then start OpenOffice.org, I get an
error message:
"Either another instance of OpenOffice.org is accessing your
personal settings or your personal settings are locked. [...] Do you
really wa
Andreas,
There exists a bug inside OOo 2.0.3 regarding this lock file.
Normaly it's removed on closing OOo. So next start of an office
does not show this message. But if you dont close the office but logout
from e.g. windows these lock files inst removed successfully.
So you will get this
Hi,
Jens Gierke wrote:
Hi!
First of all I've to say that my English is not the best but I hope you
will understand what I want to say^^
no problem, You know there is a german user list, too, at
http://de.openoffice.org/ ?
Because of a visually impairment I have to use a screen magnifier
(
On 7/19/06, André Wyrwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But "microsoftoffice.com" is not "officesuites.com". That's the
difference that makes it dodgy to me.
I still don't see the difference, but you can see things as dodgy that you
want to see as dodgy, as you said. So it's generic. So what?
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Is there a way to take an OO.o doc, get all letters replaced with X or x,
> metadata stripped, embedded images replaced by blanks with the same sizes,
> and every other names (variables, bookmarks, fields, references,
> color/style names) anonymized?
Replacing the text sh
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
As most bugs happen on complex documents, most complex documents are
created in corp-space and corporations don't like disseminating internal
info for debugging purposes I suppose I'm far from the only one with
knowledge of bugs but no way to report
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 11:41:16 AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have several complex corp documents which make OO.o go crazy one
> way or another. I'd like to report the bugs to get them fixed, but
> OO.o devs will just ignore me without test documents and there's n
Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 à 09:54 +0200, Mathias Bauer a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to take an OO.o doc, get all letters replaced with X or x,
> > metadata stripped, embedded images replaced by blanks with the same sizes,
> > and every other names (variables, bookmarks,
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 11:41:16 AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I have several complex corp documents which make OO.o go crazy one
way or another. I'd like to report the bugs to get them fixed, but
OO.o devs will just ignore me without test documents
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le jeudi 20 juillet 2006 à 12:59 -0600, Robin Laing a écrit :
There is one benefit to making the changes manually. You may find the
part of the document that is causing the problem.
And then 90% of testers won't finish the gruelling anonymizing work, the
problem won
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 20:39:38 PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> For once we disagree
No problem, it happens to outstanding minds :-)
With respect to your remark that theory is greatly different from
practice and that:
> So as long as you don't get caught and don't crash you
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 23:38:37 PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Not surprising, it only reflects the tester/average user ratio. Do
> you want to make tester life easier, because they are few and you
> need to nurture them, or do you want to discriminate against them
> because
There has been comment in the media about a report on a French
language website: "Le ministère de la Défense met OpenOffice à l'index"
The ZDNet article [1] claims to describe the proceedings of a
confidential meeting within the French public administration. It is
not appropriate for the Op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
very nice discussion, guys. Interesting.
It's nice to see an actual rollout of the problems beyond pure
idealistic enthusiasm. ;-)
> Hey, don't get me wrong, we're on the same side. What gave you the
> impression that I want to discriminate test
17 matches
Mail list logo
