Hi, not sure if we are talking about the same type of file. I am thinking
you might be referring too the main openoffice folder, not a file from one of
the modules. I did try to zip it, expand, rename, (not in that order) and
did not have any luck, only the original "file" appears and noth
When writer tries to recover the file, sometimes it is successful others
times not (same file). That seems to depends on if I rename the file and try
to
open it. If I hit cancel (recovery stage) it will open the recovered file
(different named, same file) and lock up. If I am not posting
I see note pad and word will not make sense of the file. Is there a editor
program out there that I can use to remove/edit the html and table stuff from
the file? I am thinking this is where the problem is, not 100%.
thanks
Rene
In a message dated 3/6/2008 10:44:27 A.M. Eastern Standar
All,
Some interesting news.
Summary
* The license for code is changing from the early LGPL v 2.1 to 3.0
effective the Beta of OpenOffice.org 3.0. (The actual date of this
beta has not been finalized.)
* The Joint Copyright Assignment form (JCA) is being replaced by the
Sun Micr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When writer tries to recover the file, sometimes it is successful others
times not (same file). That seems to depends on if I rename the file and try to
open it. If I hit cancel (recovery stage) it will open the recovered file
(different named, same file) and lock
2008/3/6, Robin Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > When writer tries to recover the file, sometimes it is
> successful others
> > times not (same file). That seems to depends on if I rename the file
> and try to
> > open it. If I hit cancel (recovery stage) it will ope
On 6 Mar 2008 at 13:05, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
> All,
>
> Some interesting news.
>
> Summary
>
>
> * The license for code is changing from the early LGPL v 2.1 to 3.0
> effective the Beta of OpenOffice.org 3.0. (The actual date of this
> beta has not been finalized.)
Maybe some
I use stuffit utility, still not clear about getting more file(s) back then
what I started with? When I zip and then unzip the *.odt, I have only one
file. If I understand correct, there are file(s) generated or hidden after
compressing/extracting the *.odt file? Be happy to send you th
2008/3/6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> I use stuffit utility, still not clear about getting more file(s) back
> then
> what I started with? When I zip and then unzip the *.odt, I have only
> one
> file. If I understand correct, there are file(s) generated or hidden
> after
> co
To Nicu: How many users do you think they will lose when they switch?
People who have files in OOo format that they have made for quite some
time, will NOT be able to use the new format, it seems! Are they going
to allow for that with a conversion of some sort? :-(
Nicu Buculei wrote:
jonatho
To Louis Saurez-Potts: Have they even given consideration to people who
have many documents in the older format? Will there be consideration for
some kind of conversion of those documents? :-(
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
All,
Some interesting news.
Summary
* The license for code is c
File format or data is not a code generation issue. You are confusing code
with content and compatibility.
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:55:54 -0600, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
To Nicu: How many users do you think they will lose when they switch?
People who have files in OOo format th
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 12:55 -0800, John Boyle wrote:
> To Nicu: How many users do you think they will lose when they switch?
> People who have files in OOo format that they have made for quite some
> time, will NOT be able to use the new format, it seems! Are they going
> to allow for that with
Thanks for the clarification. Change the file extension to a zip = *.odt
to *.zip. Now if I can get it to change, so far stuffit has not recognized
the extension change. I have tried a known good file and experencing the same
issues, maybe I am doing something incorrect. Will keep worki
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:55 PM, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People who have files in OOo format that they have made for quite some time,
> will NOT be able to use the new format, it seems! Are they going to allow for
> that with a conversion of some sort? :-(
Please explain how you
To jonathon: That is NOT the way it sounds! However, I will take your
word for it, until I see the real results! :-(
jonathon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:55 PM, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
People who have files in OOo format that they have made for quite some time,
will NOT
How does it sound then?
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:41:19 -0600, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
To jonathon: That is NOT the way it sounds! However, I will take your
word for it, until I see the real results! :-(
jonathon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:55 PM, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:54:24 -0600
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> How does it sound then?
>
The LGPL is the licence that the program is released under.
OpenOffice.org (OO.o) is given to you as long as you adhere to your part
of the LGPL. You agree to the LGPL when you install and run OO.o.
Those w
John Boyle wrote:
To Nicu: How many users do you think they will lose when they switch?
People who have files in OOo format that they have made for quite some
time, will NOT be able to use the new format, it seems! Are they going
to allow for that with a conversion of some sort? :-(
Reviving
19 matches
Mail list logo
