[discuss] Re: Still looking for good reasons for open source

2005-11-10 Thread Randomthots
Andrew Brown wrote: It's not really a query. I'm thinking out loud. Ian Lynch made some good points about OSS applications best understood as a strategic collaboration between behemoths like IBM and SUN. But that's not how Eric Raymond would see it. Bingo! ESR's thesis was based on the

[discuss] Re: Still looking for good reasons for open source

2005-12-11 Thread Andrew Brown
Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> I'm slightly confused by what you've said here. I think that "eyeballs" >> refers to people looking at the program. OOo has *plenty* of eyeballs. >> According to the Stats page, Over 53 million sets of eyeballs. >> http://

[discuss] Re: Still looking for good reasons for open source

2005-12-11 Thread Randomthots
Andrew Brown wrote: > Well, you're both right. I mean that eyeballs finding bugs does not translate to eyeballs capable of fixing them. There may be some comment by Eric Raymond about this over on my blog. I can't remember. In any case, his argument was -- I think -- that users don't have eye