[discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-11 Thread Jacqueline McNally
Hello Is anyone using CosmoPOD.com ? I have heard it is back with improvements to the site (including a support forum), and they have upgraded OpenOffice.org to 2.0. I guess what I/we would like to know is it something that we wish to promote and or recommend to our friends, family and colle

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-11 Thread Chad Smith
On 12/11/05, Jacqueline McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > Is anyone using CosmoPOD.com ? I am, now that I just found out about it. :-) -- - Chad Smith http://www.gimpshop.net/ Because everyone loves free software!

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:55:34 -, Jacqueline McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Is anyone using CosmoPOD.com ? I have heard it is back with improvements to the site (including a support forum), and they have upgraded OpenOffice.org to 2.0. I guess what I/we would like to know is

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Henrik Sundberg
2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:55:34 -, Jacqueline McNally > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello > > > > Is anyone using CosmoPOD.com ? > > > > I have heard it is back with improvements to the site (including a > > support forum), and they have u

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:51:13 -, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:55:34 -, Jacqueline McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Is anyone using CosmoPOD.com ? > > I have heard it is back with imp

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Henrik Sundberg
2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:51:13 -, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > 2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:55:34 -, Jacqueline McNally > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > He

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:12:12 -, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No I have not. Would that make the security warnings less valid? /$ No but then is not about cosmopod but about NX, and it doesnt address the original question, which is if we should promote them. -- Alexan

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Henrik Sundberg
2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:12:12 -, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > No I have not. Would that make the security warnings less valid? > > /$ > > No but then is not about cosmopod but about NX, and it doesnt address the >

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Marco Fioretti
Alexandro Colorado wrote: > [this] doesn't address the original question, which is > if we should promote [Cosmopod]. www.openoffice.org says "the productivity suite that... governments, and corporations... have been expecting for the last two years" as in "gee, is this a professional, business o

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:17:59 -, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:12:12 -, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No I have not. Would that make the security warnings less valid? > /$ No b

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:24:51 -, Marco Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: [this] doesn't address the original question, which is if we should promote [Cosmopod]. www.openoffice.org says "the productivity suite that... governments, and corporations... have been

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Marco Fioretti
Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > I guess thats the whole idea of using Cosmopod to be able to > use Linux and open source without going to Jail for it (or > at least get fired). > > I am amazed how people cant wait to open their mouths before > even triying it. And they expect people to try openof

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Alexandro Colorado
What does Sun has to do with anything? Is this a real question? Isn't Sun paying (at least part of) the oo.org hosting expenses (never mind the programmers)? Do you really expect them to support an official endorsement of a service that says "run your own business while you're paid to do somet

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Marco Fioretti
> >> What does Sun has to do with anything? > > > > Is this a real question? Isn't Sun paying (at least part of) > > the oo.org hosting expenses (never mind the programmers)? Do you really > > expect them to support an official endorsement of a service that says > > "run your own business while

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Alexandro Colorado
I would be delighted to address any concern of yours, but frankly I can't really make any sense of the three paragraphs above. (seriously!). May I ask you to rephrase them? have u used cosmopod? If not, use it and then comment. -- Alexandro Colorado CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES http://e

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Marco Fioretti
> == > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:50:27 - > From: "Alexandro Colorado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: discuss@openoffice.org > Subject: Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com > == > > > > I would be delighted to a

Re: [discuss] CosmoPOD.com

2005-12-12 Thread Chad Smith
On 12/12/05, Marco Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's forget what you've written so far, shall we (everybody has > bad moments): please restart from scratch, answering again to > my original message. To answer the original question "Should we promote CosmoPOD to our friends and family?"