Hi Theo,
OOmouse wrote (18-11-2009 22:14)
[...]
So, perhaps the consensus will be that it simply doesn't fit. That's
all right, but in any case, I would like the Community to understand
that the proposal was more a consequence of the mouse than a marketing
scheme for it and that it was
Hello Juergen and everyone,
While I don't disagree with most of Juergen's conclusions, I would like
to point out that the proposed project is the SOFTWARE we've written for
the mouse, not the mouse hardware itself. To the extent that the
OpenOfficeMouse concept was a marketing scheme, that
I understand your reasoning and also can not (yet) see any benefit for
the OOo project.
Regards
Kay
Juergen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
for new incubator projects the main question for me is, if there is any
real relation and benefit for our project. In case of this mouse i am
not sure and i
Cor Nouws wrote:
Unless other information makes me change my mind, I support Juergens
point of view,
I also support Juergens Point of View
-1 for OpenOfficeMouse incubator project
Cor
Kind regards,
Bernd Eilers
-
Wunna Ko wrote:
+1 for incubator project.
Nice to see a hardware with OpenOffice.org labelled on it.
this is not really a good argument for a project and we should take it a
little bit more serious.
If you vote a project please think about the consequences it might have.
We are a software
Dear Mr. Hanson:
In your recent message, you side you have the wrong address.
I am a bit confused. Who had the wrong address for what? Were you referring
to Wanna KO, or me (Bruce Martin?)
Best Regards,
brucemarti...@gmail.com
Juergen Schmidt wrote:
I would of course kill or remove projects where no activity is going
on. Or better i would consolidate the number of projects generally.
Something for your CC agenda? ;)
/me would be glad to see that happening ...
-- Thorsten
pgpi1TmevZ5tD.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi,
Thorsten Behrens schrieb:
Juergen Schmidt wrote:
I would of course kill or remove projects where no activity is going
on. Or better i would consolidate the number of projects generally.
Something for your CC agenda? ;)
Actually it is on the agenda:
Hi,
for new incubator projects the main question for me is, if there is any
real relation and benefit for our project. In case of this mouse i am
not sure and i don't really see it. It is a piece of hardware with very
flexible configuration options. Not more and not less. Ok one of the
...@sun.com]
Sent: November 9, 2009 7:29 AM
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Incubator project proposal - OpenOfficeMouse
Hi,
for new incubator projects the main question for me is, if there is any
real relation and benefit for our project. In case of this mouse i am
not sure
play
a valuable role in the development team.
Best Regards all,
Bruce Martin
Quebec, Canada
-Original Message-
From: juergen.schm...@sun.com [mailto:juergen.schm...@sun.com]
Sent: November 9, 2009 7:29 AM
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Incubator project proposal
ReHi Juergen:
It is possible that I mistook somebody's identity. I see that [discuss] had
a lot of participants and it is a very plausible mistake.
Also, my idea was not intended to be directly related to open office or any
particular operating system. It is intended as a generic hardware
Bruce Martin wrote:
ReHi Juergen:
It is possible that I mistook somebody's identity. I see that [discuss] had
a lot of participants and it is a very plausible mistake.
Also, my idea was not intended to be directly related to open office or any
particular operating system. It is intended as a
Unless other information makes me change my mind, I support Juergens
point of view,
Cor
Juergen Schmidt wrote (9-11-2009 13:29)
for new incubator projects the main question for me is, if there is any
real relation and benefit for our project. In case of this mouse i am
not sure and i don't
+1 for incubator project.
Nice to see a hardware with OpenOffice.org labelled on it.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Unless other information makes me change my mind, I support Juergens point
of view,
Cor
Juergen Schmidt wrote (9-11-2009 13:29)
for new
YOU HAVE THE WRONG ADDRESS!!
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Martin [mailto:brucemarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 12:10 PM
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Cc: juergen.schm...@sun.com
Subject: RE: [discuss] Incubator project proposal - OpenOfficeMouse
ReHi Juergen
YOU HAVE THE WRONG ADDRESS!!
-Original Message-
From: Wunna Ko [mailto:wunnak...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 4:38 PM
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Incubator project proposal - OpenOfficeMouse
+1 for incubator project.
Nice to see a hardware
Hi Elizabeth,
The User Feedback Program has been amazingly useful. It's given us a
much better understanding of how people actually use the OOo
applications rather than forcing us to theorize about it. For example,
in Writer, people are 5.2x more likely to use the toolbar icon to Bold
text
Hi Theo,
On 10/12/09 21:04, OOmouse wrote:
[...]
The OpenOfficeMouse mouse is designed specifically for use with
OpenOffice and incorporates OOo 3.1 usage data for its default button
assignments.
Just a note on the usage data in case anyone is wondering which data
that is. The usage data
Hi Theo,
+1 for your incubator
Kind regards
Sophie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org
I am the designer of the OpenOfficeMouse and a long-time user of
OpenOffice.org, particularly Writer and Impress. It is my belief that
application interface efficiency can be pursued in other ways than new
variations on hotkeys, pull-down menus, and icon toolbars. We are
planning to release
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:04 PM, OOmouse oomo...@openoffice.org wrote:
I am the designer of the OpenOfficeMouse and a long-time user of
OpenOffice.org, particularly Writer and Impress. It is my belief that
application interface efficiency can be pursued in other ways than new
variations on
22 matches
Mail list logo
