Re: [discuss] Lack of OOo feature forces writer to move to Windows from Linux.

2006-08-09 Thread Rich
Robert Derman wrote: ... I would predict that at some time in the next 3 to 9 years OOo will pass M$ Office in total numbers of copies in use. And I suspect that M$ may actually help with this. In many of the things that M$ does they actually shoot themselves in the foot. They are

Re: [discuss] Lack of OOo feature forces writer to move to Windows from Linux.

2006-08-07 Thread jan . sekal
yes, professionals simply have to use microsoft, because oo lack some important features: saving only changes, not the whole document everytime again (10 MB .doc can be save within 1 s, in oo definitely not) faster special symbol handling faster starting - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA - Od: Robin Laing

Re: [discuss] Lack of OOo feature forces writer to move to Windows from Linux.

2006-08-07 Thread Ian Lynch
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, professionals simply have to use microsoft, because oo lack some important features: saving only changes, not the whole document everytime again (10 MB .doc can be save within 1 s, in oo definitely not) faster special symbol

Re: [discuss] Lack of OOo feature forces writer to move to Windows from Linux.

2006-08-07 Thread Rich
Ian Lynch wrote: On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, professionals simply have to use microsoft, because oo lack some important features: saving only changes, not the whole document everytime again (10 MB .doc can be save within 1 s, in oo definitely not) faster

Re: [discuss] Lack of OOo feature forces writer to move to Windows from Linux.

2006-08-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Lun 7 août 2006 14:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : To Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]: special symbols: look at the two .png files I have attached to this email. I see no attachements in this mail microsoft has a field recently used, which is so extremely clever, that i am deeply impressed :)