Robert Derman wrote:
...
I would predict that at some time in the next 3 to 9 years OOo will
pass M$ Office in total numbers of copies in use. And I suspect that M$
may actually help with this. In many of the things that M$ does they
actually shoot themselves in the foot. They are
yes, professionals simply have to use microsoft, because oo lack some
important features:
saving only changes, not the whole document everytime again (10 MB .doc
can be save within 1 s, in oo definitely not)
faster special symbol handling
faster starting
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
Od: Robin Laing
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, professionals simply have to use microsoft, because oo lack some
important features:
saving only changes, not the whole document everytime again (10 MB .doc
can be save within 1 s, in oo definitely not)
faster special symbol
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, professionals simply have to use microsoft, because oo lack some
important features:
saving only changes, not the whole document everytime again (10 MB .doc
can be save within 1 s, in oo definitely not)
faster
Le Lun 7 août 2006 14:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
To Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
special symbols:
look at the two .png files I have attached to this email.
I see no attachements in this mail
microsoft has
a field recently used, which is so extremely clever, that i am deeply
impressed :)