Lars D. Noodén wrote:
How can we get some input about this from StarOffice folks?
So far all we're hearing is the MS sales reps version of the story.
There are a fair number of ubsubstantiated assertions but nothing
independently verifiable.
It does look like MS was also able to shoot down
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:49 +1000, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> As I'm always one for conspiracy theories, let me suggest the following ...
I'm much more inclined to believe in the power of ignorance, and lack of
long term vision.
--
Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ZMSL
---
I'm not much for conspiracy theories either, anything that requires much
planning or accuracy is doomed.
It's been hard to find articles that are more than just re-writes of the
Register piece (or whatever they used). However, it does seem that a
common theme in the earlier articles was probl
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 03:38 -0400, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> I'm not much for conspiracy theories either, anything that requires much
> planning or accuracy is doomed.
>
> It's been hard to find articles that are more than just re-writes of the
> Register piece (or whatever they used). However, i
IMHO, someone who is a reporter and on the ground should spent some
time trying to find out what was behind this decision. Like Ian, I
suspect mere laziness and misunderstanding and fear. I also don't buy
the interoperability argument UNLESS the cops are planning to buy more
MS integration later
On 8/23/05, Christian Einfeldtextra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMHO, someone who is a reporter and on the ground should spent some
> time trying to find out what was behind this decision. Like Ian, I
> suspect mere laziness and misunderstanding and fear. I also don't buy
> the interoperability
