Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-15 Thread Phillip (Flip) Russell
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 Phillip (Flip) Russell wrote: The next rev of NeoOffice will require Java 1.4 which doesn't exist on 10.2. Besides, 10.2 really should have been called a beta. A horrible release with many bugs that were fixed in 10.3. Also, technica

Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-15 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 Phillip (Flip) Russell wrote: > The next rev of NeoOffice will require Java 1.4 which > doesn't exist on 10.2. > Besides, 10.2 really should have been called a beta. > A horrible release with many bugs that were fixed in 10.3. > Also, technically there was never a stab

Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-15 Thread Phillip (Flip) Russell
The next rev of NeoOffice will require Java 1.4 which doesn't exist on 10.2. Besides, 10.2 really should have been called a beta. A horrible release with many bugs that were fixed in 10.3. Also, technically there was never a stable X11 relase for 10.2 either. The stable version was released with

Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-15 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi If you are trying to use the "official" X11 OpenOffice.org on there, you have to download and install X11 from apple.com is it not delivered on the dvd ? Laurent -- Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org Indesko >> http://www.indesko.com Nuxeo C

Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-15 Thread Chad Smith
According to the website, it should work on Mac OS X 10.2 - and I have used NeoOffice/J on 10.2, so I'm pretty sure it should work. If you are trying to use the "official" X11 OpenOffice.org on there, you have to download and install X11 from apple.com If you want something tha

Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-15 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi I wanted to use OpenOffice on my MAC, however as I have OS X 10.2.8 unlimited client, I have to upgrade. The cost? £600. welcome in a non-free-software world ;) Anyone got any alternatives? i forward your question to the MacOs dev team I know it works for 10.3 and 10.4 may be they h

Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-14 Thread Daniel Kasak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wanted to use OpenOffice on my MAC, however as I have OS X 10.2.8 unlimited client, I have to upgrade. The cost? £600. Anyone got any alternatives? Gentoo Linux for PPC is free, and works great on my TiBook :) Not the answer you want, I know, but the problem is

Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-14 Thread Chad Smith
Why do you have to upgrade to use OOo? NeoOffice/J - (the easy-to-install-Aquafied sister project of OpenOffice.org) - http://www.neooffice.org/ - runs on Mac OS X 10.2, and so does the harder-to-install-X11 version of OOo. Either program should run on your Mac. On 11/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[E

Re: [discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-14 Thread Phillip (Flip) Russell
Mac OS X 10.4 is only £88 in the UK. You are TWO major OS releases out of date. (BTW, Apple doesn't sell an unlimited client. I think you are confused with the Mac OS X SERVER package.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wanted to use OpenOffice on m

[discuss] Not so free on MAC

2005-11-14 Thread the_integrator
I wanted to use OpenOffice on my MAC, however as I have OS X 10.2.8 unlimited client, I have to upgrade. The cost? £600. Anyone got any alternatives? Regards Andrew Rice -- "The information in this Internet e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the a