Guido Pinkernell wrote:
CC -> QA Mailing list. For your information at QA: Regularily people in
various mailing lists report bugs which can be confirmed but don't get filed
in Issuezilla, for various reasons.
Robert suggested volunteers for monitoring the mailing lists for this sort of
bug r
CC -> QA Mailing list. For your information at QA: Regularily people in
various mailing lists report bugs which can be confirmed but don't get filed
in Issuezilla, for various reasons.
Robert suggested volunteers for monitoring the mailing lists for this sort of
bug reports. I picked up this id
Guido Pinkernell wrote:
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2005 18:56 schrieb Robert Derman:
Guido Pinkernell wrote:
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2005 02:52 schrieb Paul:
Nope. You have to get a login using the www.openoffice.org site, you
can then lodge a bug report.
Which you can do
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2005 18:56 schrieb Robert Derman:
> Guido Pinkernell wrote:
> >Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2005 02:52 schrieb Paul:
> >>Nope. You have to get a login using the www.openoffice.org site, you
> >>can then lodge a bug report.
> >
> >Which you can do - after you got your login - in Iss
Guido Pinkernell wrote:
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2005 02:52 schrieb Paul:
Nope. You have to get a login using the www.openoffice.org site, you
can then lodge a bug report.
Which you can do - after you got your login - in Issuezilla:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2005 02:52 schrieb Paul:
> Nope. You have to get a login using the www.openoffice.org site, you
> can then lodge a bug report.
Which you can do - after you got your login - in Issuezilla:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html
Your findings seem to be v
Nope. You have to get a login using the www.openoffice.org site, you
can then lodge a bug report.
/paul
On 10/24/05, Joe Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i thought that's what I was doing
>
> On 10/23/05, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I haven't tried to replicate, but if you can and it is n
I haven't tried to replicate, but if you can and it is not doing what
it should be, you should lodge a bug report for the developers to have
a look at.
/paul
On 10/22/05, Joe Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When applying formatting from default italic text to default bold
> text, formatting is a
When applying formatting from default italic text to default bold
text, formatting is applied cumulatively, so I end up with default
italic bold instead of the intended default italic.
When applying heading 3 text to heading 3 italic bold text, the result
is heading 3 italic text instead of the in
