Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Since named loggers as services would give you less freedom (read: more
work) in introducing a new logger. With the current way, you can
simply ask the pool for a logger with a given name. Otherwise, you would
need to explicitly
Hi,
Sorry for being late to this discussion. I don't read those lists
continuously any more.
Frank Schönheit schrieb:
Hi,
looking for a possibility to implement some client-side logging
facilities in our database drivers, I came across css.util.logging [1] -
a UNO API which promises to
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Sorry this feedback is rather late. Anyway, I am completely confused
by what you propose.
Some things in your mail make me think you read the old css.util.logging
API, not the new one. Sure you visited
Hi Mathias,
If there is an API that is neither used nor implemented and obviously
also not good enough: shouldn't we just remove it?
I'm all for it, but AFAIK, there's not process for this, yet. For
instance, some build tools would need to be adjusted, since currently, a
build in offapi checks
Frank Schönheit wrote:
looking for a possibility to implement some client-side logging
facilities in our database drivers, I came across css.util.logging [1] -
a UNO API which promises to provide exactly such capabilities.
Unfortunately, there's no implementation for this API. Furthermore,
