On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 06:11:33PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:22:13AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > SECURITY.md currently says:
> >
> > A disclosure date is negotiated by the security team working with the
> > bug submitter as well as vendors. However, the Ope
HI Ben,
Please see inline.
Please correct my understanding, if any.
Thanks
Krishna Mohan.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Elluru, Krishna Mohan
Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Clarification
Elluru, Krishna Mohan wrote:
> I am observing one of the behavior with ovsdb(2.5), for which I would
> like to seek clarity. As per the RFC 7047, if a column on table X with
> attribute is set to mutable:false, the value can't be changed after
> creation and on attempt the constraint violation e
hi i was going through different articles about openvswitch and one
question came into my mind.
i read that for packets with no cached flow packets will be send to user
space to generate flow ,Is it achieved through some internal interfaces
between Kernal module and user space (similar to loop bac
HI Ben,
Thanks a lot for responding. Please see in line with tag ELMOHAN>
Thanks
Krishna Mohan
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 9:26 AM
To: Elluru, Krishna Mohan
Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Clarifica
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:46:50AM +, Elluru, Krishna Mohan wrote:
> I am observing one of the behavior with ovsdb(2.5), for which I would
> like to seek clarity. As per the RFC 7047, if a column on table X with
> attribute is set to mutable:false, the value can't be changed after
> creation an
HI All,
I am observing one of the behavior with ovsdb(2.5), for which I would
like to seek clarity. As per the RFC 7047, if a column on table X with
attribute is set to mutable:false, the value can't be changed after creation
and on attempt the constraint violation error would be thrown
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:15 PM, John McDowall <
jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote:
>
> I was hoping to have a broad informal meetup at Openstack Summit – I agree
> with keeping everything in the open. I was hoping to get some additional
> use cases from interested parties as it will help focus
Russell,
I was hoping to have a broad informal meetup at Openstack Summit – I agree with
keeping everything in the open. I was hoping to get some additional use cases
from interested parties as it will help focus our efforts.
I will work on the four items – a good plan. I assume that for 2 we a
Hi,
I want to use HTB with mulit-levels, and the HTB configured by the
ovs-vsctl is single level only.
However, If I configure a HTB using tc, the queues won't be registered in
the OVS database (qos and queue tables stay empty), So my question is can I
still use them in the set_queue command ? an
> The right thing to do is to uninstall your new version of OVS. Recompile it
> with the same configure options used for your earlier version and install it.
Ok. What steps need to be followed for uninstalling any OVS version? I didn't
see any on GitHub.
Cheers,
R
> On Mar 30, 2016, at 10:53
>
>On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:48:51AM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>> You can ignore the 'Generic Netlink family' error, as you've mentioned.
>
>Doesn't it indicate that he's incorrectly created a kernel-based bridge
>instead?
AFAIA, this error is printed when creating an OVS-DPDK bridge when th
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:48:51AM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> You can ignore the 'Generic Netlink family' error, as you've mentioned.
Doesn't it indicate that he's incorrectly created a kernel-based bridge
instead?
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@
Ben,
Thanks for turning the compass 180 degrees :)
Regards,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Syed Faraz Ali wrote:
> > I'm a newbie so apologies if the question sounds stupid.
> > Let's consider I'm using openvswitch and openflow as
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Syed Faraz Ali wrote:
> I'm a newbie so apologies if the question sounds stupid.
> Let's consider I'm using openvswitch and openflow as southbound protocol.
I think that your compass is 180 degrees off.
> My question is does openvswitch support more south
Hello,
I'm a newbie so apologies if the question sounds stupid.
Let's consider I'm using openvswitch and openflow as southbound protocol.
My question is does openvswitch support more southbound protocols like
I2RS, BGP-LS or NETCONF?
I didn't find any document that says openvswitch support other p
I was able to take a backtrace, after attaching gdb to the process.
Please see attached.
> -Original Message-
> From: discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Eli
> Britstein
> Sent: Thursday, 31 March, 2016 10:11 AM
> To: Flavio Leitner
> Cc: b...@openvswitch.org
> Su
Hello Vivek,
I see from your earlier posts that you are trying to get the OVS DPDK up
running. Few weeks back I submitted patch to refactor the INSTALL.DPDK.md.
Here is the link http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-March/067846.html
The INSTALL.DPDK.md is split in to 2 docs (INSTALL.DPDK.
Hi Vivek,
You can ignore the 'Generic Netlink family' error, as you've mentioned.
From the output of dpdk_nic_bind, I can see that you're using the in-kernel
standard IXGBE driver - you'll need to use one of the kernel drivers from the
DPDK codebase to use a DPDK-compatible NIC with OVS-DPDK:
Hi
I am trying to add a port in OVS bridge by following command as below-
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk0 -- set Interface
dpdk0 type=dpdk but I get error message as below-
|00018|dpif_netlink|ERR|Generic Netlink family 'ovs_datapath' does not exist. The Open vSwitch kernel module is probably
20 matches
Mail list logo
