Re: adding new router attachements dynamically?

2009-12-28 Thread Rob Heittman
gt; > > > > > > > > > De :xavier.meh...@gmail.com [mailto:xavier.meh...@gmail.com] De la > > part de Xavier Méhaut > > Envoyé : lundi 7 décembre 2009 09:12 > > À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org > > Objet : Re: adding new router attachements dynamically? >

RE: adding new router attachements dynamically?

2009-12-28 Thread Sopasakis Pantelis
ww.restlet.org > Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~ http://www.noelios.com > > > > > > > > > De :xavier.meh...@gmail.com [mailto:xavier.meh...@gmail.com] De la > part de Xavier Méhaut > Envoyé : lundi 7 décembre 2009 09:12 > À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org >

RE: adding new router attachements dynamically?

2009-12-28 Thread Jerome Louvel
s ~ Co-founder ~ <http://www.noelios.com/> http://www.noelios.com De : xavier.meh...@gmail.com [mailto:xavier.meh...@gmail.com] De la part de Xavier Méhaut Envoyé : lundi 7 décembre 2009 09:12 À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org Objet : Re: adding new router attachements dynamically?

Re: adding new router attachements dynamically?

2009-12-07 Thread Xavier Méhaut
I'm eager to read you soon. regards Xavier 2009/12/7 Bryan Hunt > Yes, there is a way to do this, but I can't go into the details. I know > that's not the answer you were looking for. A colleague and I are working > on a solution that allows you to register a representation as an Eclipse > ext

Re: adding new router attachements dynamically?

2009-12-06 Thread Bryan Hunt
Yes, there is a way to do this, but I can't go into the details. I know that's not the answer you were looking for. A colleague and I are working on a solution that allows you to register a representation as an Eclipse extension or through an OSGi service. The mechanism will be dynamic and fu

adding new router attachements dynamically?

2009-12-06 Thread Xavier Méhaut
Hello, In a certain manner related to osgi, is there a means in Restlets to add dynamically new attachements to ane exiting router, ie add new URL to be taken into account without having either to recopile the code, or (better) without having to restart the process? for instance, we had first : my