[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Tx Path

2007-04-17 Thread Anmar
Brian Padalino wrote: I believe you may be able to send 2 real signals and control their phases, but someone else here is a better authority on that than I am. Do you know who that is? I found a patch that Patrick has posted for phase shifting, put it didn't work, Did someone tried to use

[Discuss-gnuradio] building complete mbpsk modulator

2007-04-17 Thread df fd
hello im a telecommunications engineering student and i cant build complete bpsk modulator, when i multiply the signal that returns of gr_chunks_to_symbols_bc by the local oscillator the output signal its wrong and i dont know what can i do wrong this is my code: src = gr.file_source (1,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Tx Path

2007-04-17 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 08:55:08AM +0200, Anmar wrote: Brian Padalino wrote: I believe you may be able to send 2 real signals and control their phases, but someone else here is a better authority on that than I am. Do you know who that is? I found a patch that Patrick has posted for

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Tx Path

2007-04-17 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 07:25:50AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 08:55:08AM +0200, Anmar wrote: Brian Padalino wrote: I believe you may be able to send 2 real signals and control their phases, but someone else here is a better authority on that than I am. Do

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU make extension corrections?

2007-04-17 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Michael Dickens wrote: Now that gr-qtgui is back, I again get the 3 comments when bootstrapping from there, as well as 1 from gr-trellis (which has been all along). Can someone correct this (I've written before about it), or should I enter it into Trac as a low-priority fix? I'm sure it's

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU make extension corrections?

2007-04-17 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:35:48PM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote: Now that gr-qtgui is back, I again get the 3 comments when bootstrapping from there, as well as 1 from gr-trellis (which has been all along). Can someone correct this (I've written before about it), or should I enter it

[Discuss-gnuradio] Does anybody care if we require gmake?

2007-04-17 Thread Eric Blossom
I'm thinking about requiring GNU make (gmake), instead of trying to work with whatever make we find. If we do require gmake, is anybody going to have any heartburn? Thanks, Eric ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Does anybody care if we require gmake?

2007-04-17 Thread Daniel Garcia
--- Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm thinking about requiring GNU make (gmake), instead of trying to work with whatever make we find. I have not run GNU Radio on anything other than Linux but have you considered using MPC?

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Does anybody care if we require gmake?

2007-04-17 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:27:37PM -0700, Daniel Garcia wrote: --- Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm thinking about requiring GNU make (gmake), instead of trying to work with whatever make we find. I have not run GNU Radio on anything other than Linux but have you

[Discuss-gnuradio] gr_correlate_access_code_bb.cc

2007-04-17 Thread pradeepbhat
Hi, When we ran the benchmark_rx.py we printed out to a file the bit string values of all the Data received. we were able to locate the received access code in the file but we were unable to trace the payload following. Note that we are not whitening or adding CRC to the Transmitted packet just

[Discuss-gnuradio] how to modify an existing source code without recompiling the entire gnuradio-core

2007-04-17 Thread pradeepbhat
Hello guys, I am trying to modify the cpp files in gnuradio-core folder but after any modification I have to recompile every thing in the gnuradio-core, do you know a faster or a better way to do this thing. also, I can't run the code in the debugging mode. Thanks, Pradeep -- View this