Hi,
> I think it is up to bit rate, but I don't know exactly what it is.
The number of bit per second you're going to be transmitting/receiving.
It's (symbol rate) * (bits per symbol). "bits per symbol" is of course
log2(constellation points).
> Is there unlimited bit rate option for check to
Hi all.
I'm using benchmark_tx.py and rx (/digital/example/narrowband)
As I know, ex) QAM modulation is faster than BPSK one.
However, when I used both of modulation schemes, I couldn't measure
throughput.
I think it is up to bit rate, but I don't know exactly what it is.
Is there unlimited
On 03/01/2016 10:43 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
The only thing really missing in gr-uhd is the ability to do timed
commands. You can force integer-N mode by constructing your own
tune_request that includes the integer-N option. You'd use a
feature from the latest Gnu Radio to help you with
> On 01 Mar 2016, at 16:04, Abhinav Jadon wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Updated the module, the same problem persists although this time the
> transmitter took longer than usual to turn off.
I’m running a bit out of ideas :-/
Since I cannot reproduce the problem, it would be
Hi,
Updated the module, the same problem persists although this time the
transmitter took longer than usual to turn off.
Cheers
Abhinav PS Jadon
2012122
Electronics and Communication Engineering Undergraduate
IIIT - Delhi
IASc Summer Research Fellow 2015
*E*: jadonabhi...@gmail.com
*M*:
I used the new pybombs to install gnuradio and it installed gr-polar
automatically. So any error I am seeing is built into that flow.
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Johnathan Corgan > wrote:
>
>> If it isn't working with 3.7.9.1, it's not the bug I was thinking of.
Hi,
I just pushed a commit to github.
Would be great, if you could update the module and let me know if that fixes
your problem.
Best,
Bastian
> On 01 Mar 2016, at 15:25, Abhinav Jadon wrote:
>
> Hi ,
> Sorry for the delay in following up. Had mid semester exams
Hi ,
Sorry for the delay in following up. Had mid semester exams to prepare for.
I have a 8GB RAM Core i7 PC. Just to be sure that this wasn't a PC issue. I
ran it on a 16GB RAM Core i5 PC. Same issue propped up. So that leaves out
the memory leak option.
Abhinav PS Jadon
2012122
Electronics and
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Jose Ruvalcaba wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has seen this issue I am encountering when
> trying to run polar_code_example.grc. Whenever I open the file my POLAR
> code configurator block shows:
>
> Value
Dear Jose,
I'm not very experienced with gr-polar, but: did you successfully build
& install gr-polar?
Best regards,
Marcus
On 03/01/2016 08:42 PM, Jose Ruvalcaba wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has seen this issue I am encountering when
> trying to run polar_code_example.grc.
Hello All,
I was wondering if anyone has seen this issue I am encountering when trying
to run polar_code_example.grc. Whenever I open the file my POLAR code
configurator block shows:
Value "polar.load_frozen_bits_info(True, "polar.CHANNEL_TYPE_BEC",
block_size, n_info_bits, 0.0, 32)" cannot be
On 03/01/2016 10:53 AM, Nigel Steed wrote:
Thanks Marcus,
I have now implemented the tune request with a python module. Integer
N mode really helps with eliminating the spurs.
I have also added timed commands within the python file, but when I
read the N210 timer, all the fractional values
Thanks Marcus,
I have now implemented the tune request with a python module. Integer N mode
really helps with eliminating the spurs.
I have also added timed commands within the python file, but when I read the
N210 timer, all the fractional values are fixed at .9998.
I have therefore
On 03/01/2016 04:57 AM, Nigel Steed wrote:
Hi All,
Has anyone managed to use/modify the UHD Source Block to phase
synchronise multiple N210/SBX ?
From what I have read I must perform the following
(1)Configure to use external references (10MHz and 1PPS) using the
options in the UHD Source
Hi,
> On 01 Mar 2016, at 05:34, Fujiwara wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
> I am a beginner of GNU Radio. I found a very nice work in
> https://github.com/bastibl/gr-ieee802-11/tree/master and it does me a great
> favor. I connected two USRP N210,one run wifi_tx.grc, the other
Hi everyone!
I am a beginner of GNU Radio. I found a very nice work in
https://github.com/bastibl/gr-ieee802-11/tree/master and it does me a great
favor. I connected two USRP N210,one run wifi_tx.grc, the other run
wifi_rx.grc, it worked. But when I want to use cellphone to receive the WiFi
Zs,
SNR is something that depends on your signal. We can't tell you what
signal you have.
The number I can give you is the Noise Figure of the SBX at room
temperature. It's something that depends on both gain and frequency. You
can find the measurement data under [1]. Together with the normal
Dan,
That sounds like a useful approach but isn’t something I have any experience
with. Can you go into more detail on how you prepared the file with the
decimated vectors and then what the process is to plot it?
Best Regards,
Stephen Berger
TEM Consulting, LP
Web Site -
Hi,
And I want to know the "phase noise variance" of our instrument?Thanks so
much.
2016-03-01 20:50 GMT+08:00 w xd :
> Hi,
>
> I used the USRP N210 and sbx board.What is the dynamic range of the
> instrument?Namely the maximum SNR?Thanks so much.
>
> Best Regards,
> zs
>
Hi,
I used the USRP N210 and sbx board.What is the dynamic range of the
instrument?Namely the maximum SNR?Thanks so much.
Best Regards,
zs
2016-03-01 19:58 GMT+08:00 Marcus Müller :
> I think that question answers itself if you consider what SNR is.
>
> Best regards,
I think that question answers itself if you consider what SNR is.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 01.03.2016 12:34, w xd wrote:
> Thanks so much.
>
> In this case,I just change the gain of the transmitter,will be change
> the snr of the receiver?
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2016-03-01 19:02 GMT+08:00 Marcus Müller
Thanks so much.
In this case,I just change the gain of the transmitter,will be change the
snr of the receiver?
Thanks.
2016-03-01 19:02 GMT+08:00 Marcus Müller :
> Dear zs,
>
> > I want to change the ratio of power of the received signal to power of
> the noise.
>
>
Hi All,
Has anyone managed to use/modify the UHD Source Block to phase synchronise
multiple N210/SBX ?
>From what I have read I must perform the following
(1)Configure to use external references (10MHz and 1PPS) using the options
in the UHD Source Block
(2)Use integer N mode for the
Dear Roee,
I'd like to illustrate a bit how the USRP generates spectrum from the
signal you provide
1. get baseband samples from host with $f_\text{sample}$
2. upsample to $f_\text{master clock rate}$, suppressing aliases
3. shift digitally in frequency by multiplication with a complex
sinusoid
Dear zs,
> I want to change the ratio of power of the received signal to power of
the noise.
well, improving receiver SNR is the *core* problem of all wireless
communication. Unless you just add noise (on the receiver or the
transmitter side, depending on whether you want your noise to be
Sorry for that.
I'm now using the USRP N210,one transmitter and one receiver.I want to
change the ratio of power of the received signal to power of the noise.And
I want to change the gain of the transmitter.
2016-03-01 16:45 GMT+08:00 Marcus Müller :
> Dear zs,
>
>
Dear zs,
your question is absolutely unclear. SNR of what? What instrument? TX or
RX, or simulation?
Best regards,
Marcus
On 01.03.2016 07:06, w xd wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I want to change the SNR through gnuradio.Can I realize it by just
> change the gain of the gnuradio?Or the instrument is
27 matches
Mail list logo