On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:16:17PM -0500, Murtuza wrote:
Hi Friends
I understand the idea behind using history() in the Gnuradio blocks but
there is one thing that I would like to know in order to understand the
rationale behind using it. I looked at 'gr_single_threaded_scheduler.cc' to
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:03:42AM -0500, Jason Uher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Randy Heiland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Python is looking for a module literally named my_new_package. You should
simply substitute my_new_package with whatever Python module/file (e.g.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:27:15AM -0400, Geib, Jeffrey (Civilian) wrote:
I have an application where I don't necessarily care what the latency
is, but I need it to be predictable and/or constant. Is there a way to
achieve this with the USRP hardware?
Thanks!
Latency measured relative to
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:04:57PM -0400, James Park wrote:
Hi,
I am confusing with send_pkt and payload.
How can i load the data that I want to transmit in the packet? and compare
with received data using benchmark_ofdm_rx.py?
what I tried is adding file_sink to compare the transmit and
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:01:40PM -0400, Geib, Jeffrey (Civilian) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:27:15AM -0400, Geib, Jeffrey (Civilian)
wrote:
I have an application where I don't necessarily care what the latency
is, but I need it to be predictable and/or constant. Is there a way
to
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:41:29PM -0500, Jason Uher wrote:
Is the rest of the gnuradio stuff there?
No, it is in /opt/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages (OSX install)
If Python finds 'gnuradio' in /opt/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages
(which is before
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:53:57PM -0700, call5_99 wrote:
Hello,
I am new to GNU radio. So far I have been playing with benchmark_rx
and benchmark_tx. Now, I am trying to estimate the distance between the
transmitter and the receiver. For this I need a very accurate timestamp on
my
I just merged the SMP scheduler code (features/mp-sched) into the
trunk [9336]. Outside of the dependency on boost 1.35 or later (see
below), things should continue to work without changes, but will be
faster on SMP machines. This has been tested on Linux and NetBSD, and
is believed to work on
For those of you who are likely to run make distcheck (should be all
of the developers!), you'll need a bit of extra juju to succeed with
boost installed in a non-standard location.
This works for me:
$ make distcheck DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--with-boost=/opt/boost_1_36_0
Eric
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:43:40PM +0200, Mattias Kjellsson wrote:
Eric Blossom wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:57:27PM -0100, Mattias Kjellsson wrote:
On a related matter, might you (or anybody else) know, how close to
release the usrp2- libraries code is? If I re- phrase the question
FYI, more on the Zego.
Eric
---BeginMessage---
Hi Arnd,
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:07:27 +0200,
Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
On Friday 15 August 2008, Geoff Levand wrote:
A new Cell product by Sony was announced this week
at SIGGRAPH:
www.sony.com/zego
Ah, great to see
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Randy Heiland wrote:
I just updated my source code from the trunk and now get:
config.status: error: cannot find input file: gruel/Makefile.in
Suggestions?
thanks, Randy
$ ./bootstrap ./configure
$ make make check sudo make install
Eric
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:02:23PM -0700, Meadows, Brian R Civ USAF AFMC 775
TS/ENV wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know the default path for the gr-utils if
you install the gnuradio from the binary packages in Ubuntu. I am having
trouble finding it.
Not sure, but did you look in /usr/bin for
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 04:54:20PM -0700, George Nychis wrote:
Okay, more on topic with the original problem: the timestamp issues. The
problem that Steve noticed was that the timestamps jump.
Brian and I wrote a testbench for this and found that the timestamp
actually does not really
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:57:27PM -0100, Mattias Kjellsson wrote:
Johnathan Corgan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Mattias Kjellsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice to know, I almost went insane over a couple of htons() earlier today. ;)
That's why we built htonx
2. The maximum
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:58:02PM -0400, Marcus Leech wrote:
How do I arrange for there to be multiple input channels from the USRP
when I have two Rx daughtercards?
I have a dual-polarization feed now, with dual DBS_RX cards, and I want
to compute the cross product between
the two
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 06:25:10AM -0700, mehdimolu wrote:
I want to implement MIMO using gnuradio.
I already could do differential and coherent(BPSK) communication link
between two USRPs( daughter board Flex 2400 ).
right now for channel estimation in MIMO I need to do reconfigure flow
A new Cell product by Sony was announced this week
at SIGGRAPH:
www.sony.com/zego
Looks like a 1U cell. Not sure if they're going to give Linux access
to the RSX or not.
Eric
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
My gut is telling me that the failure to find the Python.h file messes
up the python version check. I did upgrade swig from 1.3.31 to 1.3.36
with no improvement.
I'm guessing there is some change in the autofoo. I tried to go back
in revs until it compiled again, back I got back to the
Revision 9296 contains a a trial fix for the make check
problem we've been seeing with gcc 4.3 (F9 and OpenSuSE), ticket:258.
The problem is that we were using a signed integer for a fixed point
accumulator which we were counting on overflowing.
According to the fine print in the C and C++
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:21:30AM -0700, Mark Rader wrote:
I looked for you on Reunion.com, but you weren't there. Please
connect with me so we can keep in touch.
Our good friend Mark Rader has been unsub'd...
Eric
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing
FYI, trac and subversion are down for maintenance.
I expect everything will be back up by 10:00 Pacific.
Eric
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Stefan Bruens wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 23:06:57 Don Ward wrote:
I ran into this today with gcc 4.3.1 on Debian (testing). Line 101 of
qa_gr_fxpt_nco.cc
new_nco.sincos ((gr_complex*)new_block, SIN_COS_BLOCK_SIZE);
only fills the first
I'm getting ready to merge the multi-processor scheduler feature
branch into the trunk. Besides adding support for SMP machines, this
removes the single top block restriction.
This merge will add a dependency on a relatively new version of boost,
1.35, which was released on March 29th, 2008.
If
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:51:26PM -0700, isaacgerg wrote:
Hi everyone,
Suppose I wanted to just read in data from the USRP and broadcast it out
over gigabit ethernet to a bunch of machines what is the largest
bandwidth I could do this with and not drop data from the USB link.
We can
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:34:01AM -0700, isaacgerg wrote:
Eric,
I have answered you questions inline:
Are you seeing any over or underruns (uOuO or uUuU) on the console?
Occasionally, I see u0 on the rx. But, even if i post process data
offline, i still get the flip
How wide is
of ticket:179
http://gnuradio.org/trac/ticket/179
It was fixed in r6764 on the trunk on 10/31/2007.
Eric Blossom wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:34:01AM -0700, isaacgerg wrote:
Eric,
I have answered you questions inline:
Are you seeing any over or underruns (uOuO or uUuU
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 03:32:22PM +0200, Andreas Fernström wrote:
Problem solved!
I just had to add /opt/cell/toolchain/bin
to PATH on the build machine.
After that, configure-cell-cross, make, 'make check' and 'make install'
worked without problems.
I would however like to point
FYI, gnuradio.org appears to be unreachable right now (as are some
other machines on the same network). I've sent email to folks who can
do something about it.
In the meanwhile, enjoy your Saturday. I'm off to see the X-Files :-)
Eric
___
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:46:58AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
BTW, what does that guy mean Not sure when you updated, but we have changed
the checked in code to default to 2437, and run it like this (as a NetBSD
rc.d start script), following the above link?
details if you care, but
2008/7/25 Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:46:58AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
BTW, what does that guy mean Not sure when you updated, but we have
changed
the checked in code to default to 2437, and run it like this (as a NetBSD
rc.d start script
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:12:38PM -0700, isaacgerg wrote:
Hi,
I am using the Basic RX/TX at 24Mhz. Both the tx and rx tell me that
there is no residual carrier. yet, the waveform I send seems to keep
flipping from positive to negative polarity. Is it possible that there is
residual
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:41:29AM -0700, Walter Snel wrote:
Radio afficionados,
I'm trying to compile the normal gnu-radio trunk on the PS3. Unfortunately I
run into an issue.
I'd appreciate a pointer in the right direction.
I used FC9, installed the cell SDK (3.0.0.1.0) and
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:45:57AM -0700, isaacgerg wrote:
Is there any documentation on what the gain does for the USRP receive and
transmit functions. Sometimes it seems like these values are meaningless.
Sometimes they are fixed. Have you queried the valid ranges for the
daughterboards
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 02:32:06PM +0200, Sebastiaan Heunis wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to write USRP data to a FIFO and read it out using a C++
app. I can't get it to work. What I did was to type 'mkfifo myfifo'
in the shell. This is the output to ls -l myfifo.
prw-r--r-- 1 sebastiaan
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:06:57AM -0700, yyzhuang wrote:
As I see from the simple manual and some source code, most of the blocks are
designed for PHY layer or hard ware. Should all the MAC layer functions
implemented by python application, or are there any existing MAC layer
blocks we can
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:37:03PM -0400, George Nychis wrote:
Eric Blossom wrote:
In the relatively near term, I'll be gluing the message blocks
(m-blocks) and the GR flow graphs together. When that is complete, I
expect that what you'll find is that the natural place to write MAC
layer
I've added the framework for Altivec, and implemented
gr_fir_fff_altivec using it. This gives a speedup of between 1.8 and
3.0 depending on the type of machine it's running on. There's probably
another factor of 1.25 - 1.50 that can be obtained by recoding
dotprod_fff_altivec.c directly in
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 09:08:39PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
See http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/MPSchedulerPerformance for pretty
pictures and links to the code and raw data.
I've added graphs showing Altivec performance.
The MP scaling on the PS3 is _much_ better with Altivec than without
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:59:17PM -0500, Ketan Mandke wrote:
My colleague Steve and I have been working with the inband receive
code in an effort to understand how the timestamps work. Specifically,
we have been printing the timestamps from the usrp_rx block while
running
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:39:56PM +1200, Richard Clarke wrote:
Bumped
Hi All,
I have been attempting to use a GNU Radio 3.1.2 Virtual Machine (guest OS
is Open Suse 10.2) kindly provided by Chiara De Dominicis, with the USRP.
Initial communications with the USRP were established, enough
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:23:55AM -0700, irene159 wrote:
Eric Blossom wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 03:19:08PM -0700, irene159 wrote:
Hi,
I have the same problem. I have already taken a look at gr_simple_framer,
but code seems slightly complicated. I would appreciate any
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 06:04:54AM -0700, irene159 wrote:
I am trying to extract data from a Turbo Code signal. My block’s input is the
signal with synchro sequences between frames. The block processes this input
in order to drop FEC bytes and send only useful data on the ouput. The
problem
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:59:23PM -0500, Jason Uher wrote:
I am trying to read samples from the USRP and the only samples I
receive back are integers between -2 and 2; not the -1500 to 1500 that
I get when running the samples.
As far as I can tell there is no difference between my set up
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:31:24PM -0500, Jason Uher wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Jason Uher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if this is a problem, but you're not checking for errors
after any of the calls.
This should be:
r = ur.tune(0, r_subdev, 24e8)
Eric
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:26:03AM -0700, Choolo wrote:
Matt-John wrote:
Hello All,
We are planning to use USRP/GNURADIO core to produce some commercial
products. Is this legal ? If not, how we can make it legal ? We dont want
to start anything not legal, so the answer is
I've collected scaling data on several machines and it looks good!
Executive summary:
All your core are belong to us!
See http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/MPSchedulerPerformance for pretty
pictures and links to the code and raw data.
Feel free to send more in. Use run_synthetic.py to gather
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 08:17:33AM +0200, Dominik Auras wrote:
Hi Eric!
Very nice work! I have run the synthetic benchmark program on our machine.
The scaling is wonderful. It is running almost 8x faster.
If you like, I can send you some reports.
Dominik
I'd love to have them. If you've
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:52:13PM -0400, Anand Prabhu Subramanian wrote:
Hello,
I am currently working on a custom made SDR platform and trying to use gnu
radio to program it. I understand that I need to write seperate source and
sink blocks to receive and send I/Q samples from and to the
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 03:46:42PM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote:
OSX 10.5.4, XCode 3.0 (gcc 4.0.1), using MacPorts for all requirements. I
can send specific versions of requirements upon request.
From the checked out branch:
% mkdir build_all
% cd build_all
% ../configure
[snip]
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:27:50PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 07:55 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
I've checked in an SMP-aware scheduler and would love folks to start
testing with it. I'm seeing good scaling performance when running it
mp-sched cross compiles
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:55:21PM -0400, Anand Prabhu Subramanian wrote:
Dear Eric,
Thanks for the pointer. I get raw IP packets.
Intersting choice. What are you using for the protocol field?
Why not go for UDP? It's only 8 bytes longer, and easy to deal with
in user mode on any OS.
I
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 03:19:08PM -0700, irene159 wrote:
Hi,
I have the same problem. I have already taken a look at gr_simple_framer,
but code seems slightly complicated. I would appreciate any
explanations/comments on how to code different input and output rates.
In the block I am
I've checked in an SMP-aware scheduler and would love folks to start
testing with it. I'm seeing good scaling performance when running it
on multiprocessor/multicore systems. On a dual-quad-core Xeon, there
are cases where I get 7.9 times improvement in performance over the
earlier scheduler.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:01:25AM -0400, James Park wrote:
Hi,
Could you tell me how to use gr.vector_source_c()?
I want to modulate the waveform with it, but can not find the examples.
Thank you.
$ cd gnuradio
$ find . -name '*.py' -print | xargs grep -l gr\.vector_source_c
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:55:29AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
I've checked in an SMP-aware scheduler and would love folks to start
testing with it. I'm seeing good scaling performance when running it
on multiprocessor/multicore systems. On a dual-quad-core Xeon, there
are cases where I get
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:34:45PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:55:29AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
I've checked in an SMP-aware scheduler and would love folks to start
testing with it. I'm seeing good scaling performance when running it
on multiprocessor/multicore
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:46:33PM +0200, Sebastiaan Heunis wrote:
Hi
I was wondering if anyone could please help me? I'm doing some
measurements on the Microtune Cable modem module. I already modified
the .py file to be able to set the 3 gain stages independently. I am
trying to see how
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:31:26AM -0700, Goodman Roy wrote:
Hi all,
I got the USRP and would like to use it to run some examples. Does
any one have the instruction files for new users? I read
http://www.nd.edu/~jnl/sdr/docs/tutorials/4.pdf . I feel a kind of
embarrassed to ask this kind of
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 09:36:27AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
Well, hacking the hack so the code compiles still gets me the internal
error message. Does anyone understand what this code is trying to do?
Can I just remove these tests? I'm trying to get the usrp code running
with the
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 06:32:12PM +0200, Pepito31 Pepito31 wrote:
Hello,
I would like to construct a sample and hold function with :
src_data=(0,)*4095,1
delay2=gr.vector_source_b(src_data,True)
sample_and_hold = gr.sample_and_hold_ff()
I would like that that sample and hold had a
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 07:09:55PM +0200, Sl Sl wrote:
Hi all
I want to buy several female connectors for USRP. I want to buy the same
kind of female connector as the golden one on the DBSRX-LF rev which can
connect with input signal. My problem is I do not know the name of this
kind of
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:38:20PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
Here is a patch to add windowing to
gcell/src/lib/wrapper/spu/gcs_fft_1d_r2.c , seems quick and snappy:
24a25
#include spu_intrinsics.h
50a52
52,53c54,69
// FIXME pointwise multiply in *= window
assert(0);
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:40:48PM +0200, matteo zunino wrote:
Hi,
i try to see the modulation of every carriers with the option log, but when i
put this options the is this errror :
Noise voltage: 4.472135955
Frequency offset: 0
Symbols per Packet: 16.0
Samples per Packet:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:27:40PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:16:53AM +1000, Phaysal Khan wrote:
Hi List,
Just re-stating the issues I am having with capturing IF samples of an RF
signal: I am trying to sample a 16MHz wide spectral content from a signal
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:54:38PM +1000, Phaysal Khan wrote:
In the trunk (sorry, I didn't take time to build 3.1.2), when I do this, I
see 16MHz of spectrum:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ usrp_fft.py -8 -f 92.1 -d 4
How do you _know_ you're not getting +/- 8MHz?
I am looking at the signal
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:47:02AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
As part of our work getting gnuradio on the beagle board, we needed to
compile gnuradio with gcc-4.3.1 (needed for NEON support). I forget
what the current gcc-4.3 status is, but this patch may be helpful for
some people using
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 07:52:56AM -0700, irene159 wrote:
Are there any files using resampling function that I can take a look at?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]$ find . -name '*.py' -print0 | xargs -0 grep -l
rational_resampler
./gnuradio-core/src/lib/swig/gnuradio_swig_py_filter.py
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:23:23AM -0600, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Here's a hastily put together demo of using gcell.fft_vcc in a usrp/fft
gui, running at d=64 and fft_size=2048, using 6 spus:
http://www.swigerco.com/spu_fft_2048_d64.jpg
the ppu usage tops at about 90%. You can trade off d=32
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:23:16PM +0200, Mattias Kjellsson wrote:
Hi,
I have been browsing the sources for the usrp2, so that I'm familiar enough
with the code when the new usrp2 comes. I have a million questions
regarding it, but there is one simple one for starters. At line 70 in my
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:21:25PM +1000, Phaysal Khan wrote:
Hi List,I am using an RFX2400 d'board, for IF sampling a signal
which is 20MHz wide, centered at 2.4125GHz. I know it's not possible
to sample whole 20Meg, but I am happy with a 16MHz version at this
stage (which we belive is the
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 03:48:56PM +1000, Phaysal Khan wrote:
Hi,
Thanx Eric and Johnathan. I would be upgrading my radio to
3.1.2. But the actual question remains: Is there any way to bring
this incoming RF Signal down to some IF (say 10MHz)? and to get only
real samples?
Nope. Complex
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 03:20:30PM +0200, Sebastiaan Heunis wrote:
Hi
Can anyone please tell me how to individually control the
amplification stages when using a Microtune tuner module with the usrp
(IF,RF and PGA)? self.subdev0.set_gain() sets the total gain as far
as I understand.
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:37:22AM +0200, matteo zunino wrote:
Hi,
i've a question about these two functions. My aim is to modify these
benchmarks in order to create a trasmission system that can choose
to put on a single carrier a BPSK or a QPSK modulation. My problem
is this one, how
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:54:22PM +0200, matteo zunino wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:37:22AM +0200, matteo zunino wrote:
Hi,
i've a question about these two functions. My aim is to modify these
benchmarks in order to create a trasmission system that can choose
to put on
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 06:05:28PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
Just need a clearification: the gnuradio FC8 installation procedure
http://gnuradio.utah.edu/trac/wiki/PS3FC8Install
says to put
exclude=blas blas-devel oprofile-debuginfo oprofile numactl nuactl-devel
in /etc/yum.conf,
For those of you interested in GNU Radio running on the Cell Broadband
Engine, please see:
http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/Gcell
http://comsec.com/papers/gcell-sdrf-2008.pdf
These talk about gcell, our SPE scheduler and off-load mechanism.
Right now I'm working on a general MP-aware scheduler
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:00:31PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 15:22 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 06:05:28PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
Just need a clearification: the gnuradio FC8 installation procedure
http://gnuradio.utah.edu/trac/wiki
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:08:06PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 20:00 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
Ok - I've redone this several times with variations; this last time was
very carefuly 'by the book' and I run into this after a fresh fc8,
updates, sdk3.0, Devel Tools,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:17:41PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 20:08 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 20:00 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
Ok - I've redone this several times with variations; this last time was
very carefuly 'by the book' and I run
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 06:36:05PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
Playing with gr-gcell/src/qa_fft.py and seeing if it can be made to
handle more than one size=32 fft. If I simply double the input data so
it gets 2 chunks, I get a segmentation fault. Might this be the same
thing as the 'make
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:45:53PM +0300, Juha Vierinen wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if anyone reads the patch list, so I will forward this here.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juha Vierinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 00:45
Subject: set_fpga_master_clock
To:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Per Zetterberg wrote:
Hi All,
Here at our department (KTH) we are trying to understand mblocks. Will
mblocks evolve with the arrival of the usrp2. Will there be a
usrp2_server.cc for instance ?
BR/
Per Zetterberg
Hi Per,
mblocks are pretty
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:29:29PM +0200, Mattias Kjellsson wrote:
Hi,
Regarding my question here a few days ago (yesterday ?). I managed to solve
the issues I had with the pmt type. After some digging in pmt.cc and pmt.h
I figured that what I was looking for was const void
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:26:44AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:29:29PM +0200, Mattias Kjellsson wrote:
Hi,
Regarding my question here a few days ago (yesterday ?). I managed to solve
the issues I had with the pmt type. After some digging in pmt.cc and pmt.h
I
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:45:53PM +0300, Juha Vierinen wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if anyone reads the patch list, so I will forward this here.
Thanks for the patch and sorry for the delay Juha,
There are at least a few of us who read the patch list and can do
something about them. I just
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:37:48PM -0700, Dan Halperin wrote:
Two not-that-related questions... but here goes.
1) I notice that multi-antenna.py claims to only work with the BasicRX
boards. Any reason I can't use the 2 RX paths on each of 2 RFX2400s
assuming the d'board is powered up and
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:36:02PM -0700, Dan Halperin wrote:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:37:48PM -0700, Dan Halperin wrote:
1) I notice that multi-antenna.py claims to only work with the
BasicRX
boards. Any reason I can't use the 2 RX
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:17:01PM -0400, Bob McGwier wrote:
Forcing PMT to be in /usr/local/lib is a problem. Why shouldn't I check in
a fix?
A: What's the problem?
B: Where did you get the idea that PMT is forced into /usr/local/lib?
Unless I missed something it follows --prefix just
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:36:34PM +0200, Jake Hertenstein wrote:
Hello all,
I am attempting to analyze data sets recorded by the USRP in Matlab for
the purpose of signal detection/analysis. The signal detection
requirement must be met by identifying prominent signals and returning
the
In r8669 in the trunk, the .loop1 and .loop2 labels in the SIMD code
have been renamed to include the name of the file they're contained
in. This should make opreport's default output more useful.
Eric
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:42:16PM -0400, Mikyung Han wrote:
BTW, any suggestion for finding out who caused calling the symbols such as
__ieee754_atan2
and __kernel_cosf, __kernel_sinf, __ieee754_rem_pio2f from libm-2.5.so?
What kind of a machine are you running on?
The first is of course the
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:59:20PM -0500, Heckler, Gregory W. (GSFC-596.0)
wrote:
I ordered the Mighty Mouse 3 active GPS antenna...
My evaluation of the antenna (in Ebayish): A .
Thanks for the report!
Eric
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:42:16PM -0400, Mikyung Han wrote:
Also .cleanup?
I just make it a local symbol. You shouldn't see it in opreport any more.
Eric
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 06:53:07PM -0400, Mikyung Han wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:42:16PM -0400, Mikyung Han wrote:
BTW, any suggestion for finding out who caused calling the symbols such
as
__ieee754_atan2
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:22:52PM -0700, Matt Ettus wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080623-cell-chip-makes-laptop-debut-in-toshiba-qosmio-but-why.html
Thanks. The guy writing the article is basically clueless.
From the article:
The flavor of Cell BE that Toshiba uses in
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 05:21:41AM -0700, wolfgang buesser wrote:
Sorry,
I may be completely off track, but I dont' see any clock-source on
the schematic of my LF-RX/TX (not basic RX/TX). As far as I
understand they only process the signals as baseband without any
frequency conversion.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 05:29:14AM -0700, Jonathan Friedman wrote:
Ok. I know that this question has been asked and answered many times,
but my code isn't behaving as I expect so I wanted to run it by the
community one more time.
gr.file_sink(gr.sizeof_gr_complex, file.txt)
I'm using a
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 02:42:03AM -0700, wolfgang buesser wrote:
Hi,
Iam using
gr.sig_source_s (self.usb_freq (), gr.GR_CONST_WAVE, 0, 0, 0)
to generate a carrier and
usrp.source_c(nchan=2,decim_rate=self.interp) to resample it at the same
frequency.
I get what I expect: 2
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:32:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Heunis wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sebastiaan Heunis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:31:30 +0200
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] C++ interface to USRP
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chuck
I know about the
1101 - 1200 of 3128 matches
Mail list logo
