[Discuss-gnuradio] was no-knob

2010-02-12 Thread rhubbell
(N9VV probably didn't mean to create a new thread under V. Pejovic's thread so starting a fresh thread.) BTW what future war fighter is needed? I thought the water-bag was obsoleted by UA drones? But to J. Brower I too looked at NI's site for some announcement. Really all we can do is take a wait

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: [dttsp-linux] Intel ATOM WHOOAAAAA Nellie

2009-02-20 Thread rhubbell
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:55:26 -0500 Dan Halperin wrote: > thing `proprietary' about the newer Intel WiFi drivers is a binary > firmware component that, primarily, enforces the FCC regulations. ** > See Disclaimer [1] ** "primarily", so what else does it do? Secondarily? Oh that's proprietary

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel ATOM WHOOAAAAA Nellie

2009-02-20 Thread rhubbell
Just say "no" to nvidia. See reasons provided by others. > them! I want to ask those who do not see an immediate need for them but I never saw a question anywhere. Basically this email (cross-posted all over the place) is an advertisement. On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:20:21 -0500 Bob McGwier wrote

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] software defined antenna

2008-10-12 Thread rhubbell
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 16:20 -0400, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > rhubbell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After being on-frequency here for a little while I can see that the > > range of experience/expertise is wide. Which is great. > > > > I'm curious if an

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] software defined antenna

2008-10-12 Thread rhubbell
On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 11:08 +1030, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote: > On Saturday 11 October 2008 09:14:48 Steve Totaro wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:20 PM, John Ackermann N8UR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > rhubbell wrote: > > >> Hi all, > &g

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FYI: One small step for GNU Radio...

2008-10-12 Thread rhubbell
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 16:19 +0200, Anders Feder wrote: > Hello, > > In what I assume is a first for GNU Radio, open source Google Lunar X > Prize contestant Team FREDNET, is planning to use GNU Radio on board > their spacecraft to the Moon. Neat for GnuRadio. Regarding LunarX, to me anything t

[Discuss-gnuradio] software defined antenna

2008-10-10 Thread rhubbell
Hi all, After being on-frequency here for a little while I can see that the range of experience/expertise is wide. Which is great. I'm curious if any long-timers have begun to look at software defined antennas? Or is there any effort at all anywhere in the public domain? I guess military and uni

[Discuss-gnuradio] Alternate docs possible?

2008-08-19 Thread rhubbell
I don't know if it's possible to have a manual like this on the gnuradio website, it is a sensible approach. Readers can provide examples of different uses of the functions, etc. http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.split.php Maybe it's to intensive for the server or there's too much maintenanc

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] where to begin

2008-08-07 Thread rhubbell
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 17:24 -0700, Johnathan Corgan wrote: > rhubbell wrote: > > > You're saying use a soundcard since that would be the cheapest way? I > > didn't know that was a possibility. I'll have to explore that and look > > through the archive. Tha

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] where to begin

2008-08-07 Thread rhubbell
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 21:27 -0400, Brian Padalino wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:54 PM, rhubbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > What would be the cheapest way to set up a rx for ULF, like Schumann -- > > 5Hz to 50Hz (and above)? I searched t

[Discuss-gnuradio] where to begin

2008-08-06 Thread rhubbell
Hello all, What would be the cheapest way to set up a rx for ULF, like Schumann -- 5Hz to 50Hz (and above)? I searched through the archives and don't see any mention of vlf or ulf. (not entirely true as there is a discussion participant named Ulf (^: ) I would like to do more later but for a st