Gregory W Heckler wrote:
> Would anyone be interested in an additional decimation stage after the CIC
> and
> the halfband filters? The usable bandwidth is ~25-50% of the actual post
> decimation sample rate, an additional decimation stage (no filtering, just a
> plain decimation) would allow t
Gregory W Heckler wrote:
> Would anyone be interested in an additional decimation stage after the
> CIC and the halfband filters? The usable bandwidth is ~25-50% of the
> actual post decimation sample rate, an additional decimation stage (no
> filtering, just a plain decimation) would allow the sam
Would anyone be interested in an additional decimation stage after the
CIC and the halfband filters? The usable bandwidth is ~25-50% of the
actual post decimation sample rate, an additional decimation stage (no
filtering, just a plain decimation) would allow the sample rate pushed
across the US
Philip Balister wrote:
> I have a narrowband FM receiver running (not based on GNU radio) using
> the usrp library and the USRP hardware. I would be helpful if the USRP
> firmware could reduce the sample to 25 ksps from the current 250 ksps
> at the maximum decimation factor. I want to try run ning
I have a narrowband FM receiver running (not based on GNU radio) using the usrp library and the USRP hardware. I would be helpful if the USRP firmware could reduce the sample to 25 ksps from the current 250 ksps at the maximum decimation factor. I want to try run ning my FM receiver on a TI OSK boa
