Matt,
I have not and I hope it was a Basic RX board not a TX.
Mike
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Hi,
Matt in a previous thread you were talking about making d/b that let
DC component pass:
If there is enough interest, I might make such a set of boards. If someone
else
is interested in the design, the BasicRX/TX are a great starting point, and I
can offer guidance.
When i'm inspecting
Damien B. wrote:
Matt in a previous thread you were talking about making d/b that let
DC component pass:
If there is enough interest, I might make such a set of boards. If someone
else
is interested in the design, the BasicRX/TX are a great starting point, and I
can offer guidance.
I
On Thursday 28 April 2005 13:48, Matt Ettus wrote:
I have seen very little interest in that.
Count me as interested, and actually wondering why your diff-amp solution
wasn't the default? I wonder what the cost differential between the AD8132
and the transformer used?
Speaking of, what is the
Hi,
thanks for the solution, maybe i'll try with a different transformer
to shift the cutoff.
When i'm inspecting the my FIR output, it's really difficult to
measure a 30ns (one sample) delay if the signal is not clean.
This is unrelated to the DC component issue.
Blame it on my bad