Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DC component and daughter-boards

2005-11-15 Thread Robitaille, Michael
Matt, I have not and I hope it was a Basic RX board not a TX. Mike ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

[Discuss-gnuradio] DC component and daughter-boards

2005-04-28 Thread Damien B.
Hi, Matt in a previous thread you were talking about making d/b that let DC component pass: If there is enough interest, I might make such a set of boards. If someone else is interested in the design, the BasicRX/TX are a great starting point, and I can offer guidance. When i'm inspecting

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DC component and daughter-boards

2005-04-28 Thread Matt Ettus
Damien B. wrote: Matt in a previous thread you were talking about making d/b that let DC component pass: If there is enough interest, I might make such a set of boards. If someone else is interested in the design, the BasicRX/TX are a great starting point, and I can offer guidance. I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DC component and daughter-boards

2005-04-28 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 28 April 2005 13:48, Matt Ettus wrote: I have seen very little interest in that. Count me as interested, and actually wondering why your diff-amp solution wasn't the default? I wonder what the cost differential between the AD8132 and the transformer used? Speaking of, what is the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DC component and daughter-boards

2005-04-28 Thread Damien B.
Hi, thanks for the solution, maybe i'll try with a different transformer to shift the cutoff. When i'm inspecting the my FIR output, it's really difficult to measure a 30ns (one sample) delay if the signal is not clean. This is unrelated to the DC component issue. Blame it on my bad