On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Thomas Tsou wrote:
> That could work. In either case, unless you're generating patches
> against tarball or repo only code sections, patches should apply to
> both version.
Indeed! I'm working off rev eefb51c0c0fac68d16544e492aebd883528607e1
and my patch applies ju
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Catalin Patulea
wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Thomas Tsou wrote:
>> http://github.com/ttsou/gnuradio-ttsou/tree/releases/3.2
> The best I've been able to find in there is 24d0fd9:
> http://github.com/ttsou/gnuradio-ttsou/commit/24d0fd908510846254f7317d
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Thomas Tsou wrote:
> http://github.com/ttsou/gnuradio-ttsou/tree/releases/3.2
The best I've been able to find in there is 24d0fd9:
http://github.com/ttsou/gnuradio-ttsou/commit/24d0fd908510846254f7317d353506c41daf079c
This seems to have only SVN keywords-related d
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Catalin Patulea
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to create a patch that applies cleanly onto a 3.2.2
> tarball. I would like to maintain my changes in the form of a Git
> branch.
>
> I can't seem to find a commit that matches up with the 3.2.2 release.
> The best I've b
Hi,
I'm trying to create a patch that applies cleanly onto a 3.2.2
tarball. I would like to maintain my changes in the form of a Git
branch.
I can't seem to find a commit that matches up with the 3.2.2 release.
The best I've been able to do is about 3000 lines of diff, which still
feels quite big
